1000 words


Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Based and Redpilled?
    2.1. Coronavirus
    2.1. Zionism
    2.3. Communism
    2.4. Immigration
    2.5. Environmentalism
    2.6. Liberalism
  3. Conclusion
  4. Julius Evola on the present state of the East


1. Introduction

A lot of “nationalists” in the West love shilling for China. They paint it as a brave rogue state, battling against the evil “Liberal” “American” World Order — a glorious savior that will bring balance, order, and “multipolarity” to the world.

Is this true? Let’s find out!



2. Evidence

This section will feature some standard, mainstream, easily-accessible, and easy-to-find articles. I could do an esoteric deep dive and take you on a Skull and Bones tour, but that would defeat the purpose of this post, which is to present information that is easily accessible and should be common knowledge to people who seemly adore China. I’ll keep the commentary to a minimum.



2.1. Coronavirus




2.2. Zionism




2.3. Communism

(Below) TL;DR: land ownership is illegal.

(Below) TL;DR: Communist spy who intentionally destroyed China’s economy to assist Communists against nationalists in China.




2.4. Immigration




2.5. Environmentalism




2.6. Liberalism


The Chinese have a god of homosexuality.

And the only homosexual shrine on the planet.



3. Conclusion

If you’ve followed me on Twitter for a reasonable amount of time, you should be well aware of what sort of country China is. It is as “occupied” as our own, as globalist as our own, as technocratic as our own, (almost) as degenerate as our own. Plus it has the added bonus of being filled with Merchants of the East who view the Talmud as a business manual. The only thing that China has going for it is a racist population and a functional (but shitty) government.

Sinophilia is a pervasive cancer eating its way through “nationalism” in the West. However, it’s merely part of a wider problem. Apparently, so-called “nationalists” of the West have completely forgotten the most basic principle of not only nationalism but politics itself: the friend-enemy distinction. Apparently, “nationalism” means shilling for as many enemy nations as possible, while relentlessly attacking your own.

Everybody is so desperate for authoritarianism that they’ll part their cheeks for any bottom-of-the-barrel non-Western dictatorship with a semi-functional government. A ridiculous amount of Westerners who claim to oppose the current order — everyone from NRx ChiCom sex tourists to drooling TRS-TWP-Radix “Third Positionists” — jump at the opportunity to fellate any hostile regime on the planet, past or present. China, North Korea, Iran, Russia, even random African slum countries are on the dick gargling list. In the case of China, these Western “dissidents” are defending the same shit-tier Liberalized Marxian globalism that pollutes the West.

It’s pathetic. Have some damn dignity, for fucks sake.


4. Julius Evola on the present state of the East

I’ll end this article with an extract from the introductory chapters of Julius Evola’s Ride the Tiger (1961), which conveys a similar message to my article, in a far more eloquent and polite manner.

Start quote:

Before leaving this topic and resuming my principal argument, it may be useful to mention another point connected to cyclical laws. This concerns the relationship between Western civilization and other civilizations, especially those of the East. Among those who have recognized the crisis of the modern world, and who have also abandoned the idea that modern civilization is the civilization par excellence, the zenith and measure of all others, some have turned their eyes to the East. They see there, to a certain degree, a traditional and spiritual orientation to life that has long ceased to exist in the West as the basis for the effective organization of the various realms of existence. They have even wondered whether the East might furnish useful reference points for a revival and reintegration of the West.

It is important to have a clear view of the domain to which such a proposition might apply. If it is simply a matter of doctrines and “intellectual” contacts, the attempt is legitimate. But one should take note that valid examples and points of reference are to be found, at least partially, in our own traditional past, without having to turn to non-European civilizations. Not much is to be gained by any of this, however. It would be a matter of conversations at a high level between isolated individuals, cultivators of metaphysical systems. If one is more concerned with real influences that have a powerful effect οn existence, one should have nο illusions about them. The East itself is now following in our footsteps, ever more subject to the ideas and influences that have led us to the point at which we find ourselves, “modernizing” itself and adopting our own secular and materialistic forms of life. What is still left of Eastern traditions and character is steadily losing ground and becoming marginalized. The liquidation of “colonialism” and the material independence that Eastern peoples are acquiring vis-a-vis Europe are closely accompanied by an ever more blatant subjection to the ideas, the mores, and the “advanced” and “progressive” mentality of the West.

Based οn the doctrine οf cycles, it may be that anything οf value from the point οf view οf a man οf Tradition, either in the East or elsewhere, concerns a residual legacy that survives, up to a point, not because it belongs to areas that are truly untouched by the principle of decline, but merely because this process is still in an early phase there. For such civilizations it is only a matter of time before they find themselves at the same point as ourselves, knowing the same problems and the same phenomena of dissolution under the sign of “progress” and modernity. The tempo may even be much faster in the East. We have the example of China, which in two decades has traveled the whole way from an imperial, traditional civilization to a materialistic and atheist communist regime-a journey that the Europeans took centuries to accomplish.

Outside the circles of scholars and specialists in metaphysical disciplines, the “myth of the East” is therefore a fallacy. “The desert encroaches”: there is nο other civilization that can serve as support; we have to face our problems alone. The only prospect offered us as a counterpart of the cyclical laws, and that only hypothetical, is that the process of decline of the Dark Age has first reached its terminal phases with us in the West. Therefore it is not impossible that we would also be the first to pass the zero point, in a period in which the other civilizations, entering later into the same current, would find themselves more or less in our current state, having abandoned-“superseded”-what they still offer today in the way of superior values and traditional forms of existence that attract us. The consequence would be a reversal of roles. The West, having reached the point beyond the negative limit, would be qualified to assume a new function of guidance or command, very different from the material, techno-industrial leadership that it wielded in the past, which, once it collapsed, resulted only in a general leveling.

End quote.