This blog won’t become a democracy but I’m always interested in feedback. The only problem is that it’s impossible to keep track of feedback when it’s all buried in random articles’ comment sections. I read most comments, but all of them go in one eye and out the other because my memory sucks.
I figured that it would be easier to keep track of any requests, questions, suggestions, complaints, etc. if they were all corralled in one place: This article’s comment section.
So, I’ll be using this article as a pinned post (if I can figure out how to pin it) for a few months to see how this idea plays out. If nobody uses it then I guess I’ll just delete it or whatever but I thought it was worth trying out.
OK TY
EDIT: A note on comment “censorship”
WordPress has an autofilter that requires me to approve certain comments, which is pretty effective at filtering out the idiots. Fortunately, their comments don’t make it out of the gate and are never seen by readers.
Sometimes these idiots cry about “censorship.” So, to be clear, I generally do not approve comments that contain:
- Racial slurs (if the comment is otherwise useful I will edit the slurs out)
- Low IQ sperging
- General schizo behavior
- Essays/textwalls (I don’t have time to read your thesis, sorry)
- URL spam to weird websites
- Fringe nonsense (“Ancient Egyptians were Black”, “Ashkenazis are Turkic”, “The Ainu are Huns”, “The Israelites were White”)
- Libtard nonsense
- Rudeness / aggressiveness for no reason
- etc.
I do not censor comments for:
- Disagreeing with me
Also, sometimes I just forget to approve comments, so good replies accidentally get censored by the auto-filter.
Basically, just don’t be a freak, a doofus, or rude and your comment will be approved. “Be normal” is a perfectly reasonable standard of behavior and the vast majority of people who leave comments do so respectfully but, frankly, some of you people deserve to be censored.
According to the Mycenean Geece wikipage the Myceneans had barely any EHG admixture and comparatively even more non-European admixture (especially from CHG). How legit is this and if true how does this affect the genetics of modern Greeks?
LikeLike
It’s probably based on a retarded study with a shitty model. Using EHG as a source population for Mycenaeans is very dumb. They had 10-20% PIE ancestry and around 10% CHG/Iran_N-related ancestry that had been in Greece since the late Neolithic. Modern Greeks have more PIE ancestry than Mycenaeans, around 30%, but Island Greeks have more Middle Eastern ancestry from Anatolia, dating back to the Iron Age and Roman Empire.
Edit: I just read the Talk page and it’s because some Iranian schizos are trying to claim that the Mycenaeans originally came from Iran.
LikeLike
Hey Thule,are you still planning on writting that article you mentioned on Telegram about the dangers of race mixing?
LikeLike
It’s on my very long to-do list.
LikeLike
Kevin Macdonald in his book, “Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future”, he argues that Western Hunter Gatherers were extremely “individualistic” and “egalitarian”. From this he assumes that this is why Europeans are so individualistic, egalitarian, etc. He does also mention Steppe Peoples and their aristocratic egalitarianism and other peculiarities contributing to the way we are.
What I don’t understand about his theory is that Western Hunter Gatherers do not seem to make up a significant part of our ancestry, for NorthWestern Europeans at least. We are far more Neolithic Farmer than WHG, and even more Indo-European.
Do you think his theory is in any way correct?
LikeLike
Are you sure he said that? Indo-Europeans were individualistic but not at all egalitarian and, as you say, we don’t have much WHG ancestry. I doubt WHG were egalitarian either. Do you have quotes?
LikeLike
I hate to be rude. However I am only asking for your input if you don’t mind? I know my comment may seem like a fedpost, it is something that really bothers me.
When we finally get our countries back, I doubt the migrants and other “minorities” could ever realize their wrongdoing. They embody everything you described about the left, only much worse.
There must be a policy of keeping out these “racial minorities” in a similar way to how Edo Japan kept out the Gaijan.
LikeLike
From their perspective they aren’t doing anything wrong. People with normal levels of ethnocentrism think “what is good for my group is morally right.” And Whites should adopt this line of thinking. Of course when nationalists take power foreigners will be banned from our countries, except for vacations.
LikeLike
@thuletide
Would it be possible for you to make an article about hybridization? There is a popular theory that you should marry someone with an immune system a different to your own as you can. There is another popular theory that hybridized children are healthier. I have seen data negating the second point, but nothing on the first point. It would be nice to have something to help dissuade these points, if possible.
-Dude
LikeLike
I have a bunch of studies on this topic so I’ll write one eventually.
LikeLike
I’m not gay but you are very handsome, I have to admit:
https://imgur.com/a/s7axSDj
LikeLike
It took years of eggmaxxing for me to look this good.
LikeLike
I’m not writing to be rude but are you Jewish?
LikeLike
That’s not me, it’s a random transgender grandma from reddit that some schizo started to use as my “dox.”
LikeLike
Great to see you back on Telegram. You were gone for a month and it had me a little concerned! : )
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello!
I’m glad you’re back. Recently, I had quite a lot of conversations with normies about race-related topics. Their typical argument against white nationalism/ethnic nationalism is that they know some non-white people who “had been nice to them” and some white people who behave like a trash, so they would prefer something like race-blind meritocracy. What would be the best counter-argument? By “the best” I mean the most convincing for a normie person, not necessarily the most scientifically relevant.
LikeLike
Hope this article could answer your question, fren!
https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/09/there-are-good-people-of-all-races-so-what-thats-not-the-issue/
LikeLike
Well, firstly policies like having an ethnically homogeneous society should be decided by averages and probabilities because you can’t run around examining every single individual, it’s stupid and impractical. Usually RW/conservative people are okay with sex realism, so you could compare race realism to that. Use an example like “men are stronger than women” – it’s true for averages, but not for fringe cases. Or you could even use men committing way more violent crime than women: No man would be scared if they encountered a gang of women in a shady alley because the probability of them attacking you is practically zero.
Secondly, a race-blind meritocracy can never exist because humans of all racial and ethnic groups (except for defective white leftists) are biologically programmed to be ethnocentric and nepotistic. In a “race-blind” meritocracy, the smartest foreigners would rise to the top of your society and transform it to benefit their ethnic kin. A good example of this is the UK, where Indians and Pakistanis became leading politicians under an ostensibly meritocratic system and (if I recall correctly) immediately advocated for more immigration from India and Pakistan.
There are probably way more arguments to use than this but these are the first two I could think of.
LikeLike
Can the position “I want to marry a virgin who will honor and obey me, as women did in the 18th century” (in modern European countries, where there aren’t too many young virgins willing to do it) be attributed to the same maladaptive beliefs as childfree, war against marriage, support for migration? If not, why not?
LikeLike
No because wanting to marry a virgin is adaptive. I’m sure you could’ve figured this out on your own.
LikeLike
Good day. Could you share with me information about Jewish organizations, parties, just major politicians lobbying for the great replacement, LGBT and other destructive leftist nonsense. I know about the activities of the Soros Foundation and ADL, but I would like to expand my vision of this situation without spending so much time, That’s why I ask you to help me. Thank you very much in advance for your answer
LikeLike
Thuletide has some Telegram posts about it, and other info. There are other people who know this better than I do.
LikeLike
Thoughts on the theory that the Gutians and Lullubi that destroyed Akkadian and Sumerian civilization were indo europeans(early Tocharian speakers) from the afanasievo culture?
LikeLike
Seems pretty implausible since they lived in the Altai Mountains, Mongolia, and the Dzungarian Basin. An Indo-European dynasty would leave clearly identifiable IE cultural traits, like the Mitanni
LikeLike
What is wrong with this account on Twitter? Pure schizo/jewish supremacist? In this tweet he claims that “Imperial Romans” are genetically closer to ashkenazi jews than Italians. Essentially he claims Roman Elite were jews. His entire account is jewish we wuzzery, and I never see anyone debunking him but I see him everywhere due to him spamming people.
https://x.com/asianjesusamigo/status/1711694045146427727?s=46
LikeLike
I think they are a crazy Turkic troll with entry-level understanding population genetics. Most people don’t waste time debunking a kook account with very few followers.
The Imperial Roman population was multiracial but heavily shifted towards the Near East, mostly Anatolia and the Levant. So it’s true that the average inhabitant of Rome during the imperial era was closer to Ashkenazi Jews than modern Italians, but that doesn’t mean they were all Jewish. Also the Roman elite had a whole bunch of different ethnic groups similar to the Western elite today – Europeans, North Africans, Middle Easterners, etc.
LikeLike
Have seen many arguments between med euros talking about whether the mena admixture is from migration during the Hellenistic era and Rome for Greeks and Italians respectively, or whether it’s just always been a part of their gene pool. Doesn’t seem to be any clear answers as they both seem to have decent models for their conclusion. Genomic phenotype predictions do seem to indicate lighter phenos being more common in the past in these areas, maybe just selection pressure? Idk
LikeLike
You can resolve this argument pretty easily by just looking at samples from different eras. There’s a clear influx of Near Eastern ancestry into Greece and Italy (mostly from Anatolia and the Levant) during the Roman imperial era. There was some minor Near Eastern ancestry in Greece before that time period though, dating back to the Neolithic.
LikeLike
There seems to be a lot of false stuff being perpetrated regarding statistics. I Would love to hear what you think. I wish i could screen shot these and upload them for you but just wanted to hear your take on it.
This is 1 for example. Would love to hear your take on it
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/white-on-white-crime-an-u_b_6771878
LikeLike
Were the balkans part of the general “classical Greece” culture in antiquity? They seem to have a bit more steppe ancestry generally than Greece. Even the Macedonians who were certainly culturally Greek seem to have a bit more steppe ancestry than them. Does this mean anything in terms of different origins?
LikeLike
No, not Greeks. The Balkans was populated by Illyrians, Thracians, Dacians, etc. at that time. There was some Scythian and Celtic intrusion but I think that post-dated Classical Greece, I forget the exact dates.
LikeLike
Why do Assyrians have so much R1b? Is it from Pontic Scythians when they joined forces to invade Levant?
LikeLike
No idea, never looked into it. You could find out by checking the Assyrian R1b subclade and cross referencing it with Scythian subclades, but it could easily be a steppe-related haplogroup that predates Scythians, and that’s probably more likely.
LikeLike
Looked into it. It’s an Armenian subclade
LikeLike
Yeah I thought that would be the case, iirc Armenians and Assyrians are very genetically similar in autosomal DNA.
LikeLike
I wonder how Keith Woods will explain Nikita Zhuravel’s forced conversion to Islam? This was in front of Ramzan Kadyrov, after filming his 15 year-old son beat up Nikita for burning the Quran in protest of the Islamification of Russia.
https://t.me/JamesArants88/1335
https://t.me/JamesArants88/1393
https://t.me/JamesArants88/1394
Post Scriptum,
I apologise if I double posted.
LikeLike
Explain in what way? He would probably support it.
LikeLike
I think that youare right; Keith would support it abroad. Yet, nevertheless he would condemn it if it happened to himself, or to someone else in Ireland. This would effect him, you see? Either that, or he would delight in a religion that would grant him a wife, or else he remain incelibate.
LikeLike
Hi Thule! Any plans to make articles about the genetics of the Romans or Russians? This would be interesting and would settle some debates.
LikeLike
I would like to recommend this really interesting article about how the big Jewish-controlled advertising lobbies are dedicated to the cultural and racial subversion of whites through advertising, movies, press, videogames, comics, etc… even if it means big losses of money just because of their hatred of the white race.
Warning: read with discretion.
https://counter-currents.com/2018/04/the-war-on-whites-in-advertising-a-follow-up/
LikeLike
First part of article here:
https://counter-currents.com/2018/03/the-war-against-whites-in-advertising/
LikeLike
Will you write a small post on the sodomite lobby intimidating & attacking the American Psychological Association, since sodomy was removed from the DSM-II 50 years ago?
LikeLike
I also request for the article to include information on the research that led to that decision, as to see if there was any bias.
LikeLike
Your account on telegram is my favorite thank you for your efforts
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are Scandinavians, in your opinion, more similar to Anglo-Saxons in terms of traits (high in individualism, Faustian Spirit, personal responsibility, self-reliance, determination, and initiative etc.) versus what Spengler considered the ”Prussian Knigthly Ideal” (loyalty, discipline, selflessness, and a sense of obligation, the group’s well-being came before the individual).
Could it have been that the Swedes highest in individualism left for the New World meanwhile the (Prussianist/ ”Prussian Socialist”) Swedes that stayed in the Old World would’ve become more susceptible to social democracy?
LikeLike
Why do Germanics have so much I haplogroup unlike the rest of western europe which is almost all r1b? Is it higher unetice ancestry?
LikeLike
Founder effect dating to the Nordic bronze Age. It’s only common among North Germanics though. West Germanics are mostly R1b.
LikeLike
Why do you classify the Caucasus Hunter Gatherers as a West Asian population because they were genetically closest to Iranian Neolithic Farmers, but you classify the Anatolian Neolithic Farmers as a European group despite them being genetically closest to Levant Natufians. You can go on vahaduo and put other archaic West Eurasian population samples as source and then put CHG and Natufian as target for proof.
LikeLike
Because ANF cluster with modern Europeans while Natufians, CHG, and Iran_N cluster with modern Middle Easterners.
LikeLike
Had a few questions on the ancient celts:
1. Did the Roman Empire and Germanic tribes have a large effect on the genetics of modern France and Belgium or are they pretty similar to the Gauls?
2. Was there a genetic shift in Bell Beaker Britain and Ireland brought about by Celts or is Insular Celtic just a result of cultural diffusion?
LikeLike
1. Mediterranean influence in the south of France, Germanic influence in the north.
3. Yes iirc there was a shift toward continental Europe during the Iron Age with more southern-shifted French-related ancestry.
LikeLike
Question on South / Central Asians like Pashtuns, Tajiks, Nuristanis etc.
Can they reasonably be classed as Middle Eastern, to keep things simple for laymen, or are they too divergent?
LikeLike
They’re definitely genetically closer to northwest Indians than to Iranians in the Middle East but not culturally, I would classify them as South/Central Asians. There’s a long Indo-Iranian ancestry cline that runs from around Western Iran into South India, west = more Middle Eastern, east = more Indian. The cut-off point for almost no native South Indian related ancestry is around the Fars province in Iran.
LikeLike
Very interesting. Could NW Indians be classed as Caucasoid?
Also, is their Western ancestry Iranic?
LikeLike
Predominantly West Eurasian but they have high levels of South Eurasian or “Australoid” type ancestry from Native South Indians.
LikeLike
Hello, I would like to make a suggestion for an introductory article on genetics.
LikeLike
It’s a big topic, anything specific? You can learn most stuff from youtube videos faster than reading an article.
LikeLike
Hello. I often meet Nazis who claim that they are far-right. And to be honest, I don’t understand what they are ultra-right about, because they are not even right at all. I would say that the Nazis are authoritarian centrists with a mixture of different ideas, including quite leftist ones (that all representatives of the white race are equal). In general, many Nazi/Fascist ideas are degenerate and destructive, and Hitler seems to me to be a rather stupid and inept leader. So, don’t you think, like me, that Nazi ideas in modern right-wing white discourse are more harmful?
Although perhaps this is an emotional position, since I am a Slav and therefore I treat all kinds of Nazi ideas badly.
LikeLike
I think that is an emotional position, they’re clearly far-right, only vaguely centrist on economics. But I do think promoting National Socialism is a bad idea due to the political baggage.
LikeLike
Do you think Darwin’s pangenesis could one day be confirmed? And if it were done, what do you think the consequences would be for racial science?
LikeLike
It kind of got adapted into the theory of epigenetics but I don’t think epigenetics, in terms of parents passing on environmentally-inherited traits to offspring, is real.
LikeLike
Do you agree with the natsocs about the need of exterminating evey single jew or part jew on the planet?
LikeLike
I’ve never posted anything about exterminating all Jews, on any platform. I think Western countries should just deport them alongside every other anti-White foreign demographic. I generally agree with Arthur Balfour, who said (paraphrased): “These people have been here for thousands of years, they’ll never integrate and we keep fighting each other, so they have to go back to Israel” (https://twitter.com/thltd_/status/1769386691481993624).
In the 19th/20th centuries, Jews were a unique problem demographic in the West because they were the only sizable foreign population agitating against and frequently in conflict with Whites. Now every foreign race on the planet invades our countries and behaves like 19th/20th century Communist Jews.
I think excessive focus on Jews (particularly Israel) is a huge problem on the “far-right.” It leads to a sort of Third Worldist “multi-racial anti-semitism,” where people support the most virulently anti-White demographics just because they said “Grr I hate Zionism, Jews are the Real Racists.” See: Nick Fuentes’ movement, Keith Woods’ followers, TRS/NJP, etc.
You could definitely argue that Jews are still unique in their level of wealth and influence, but how long will that last when the equally nepotistic Indians and Asians come flooding in? Ashkenazi Jews also intermarry at extremely high rates. They were already ~50% European and in a few generations, the average “Jew” will be >90% European. Ashkenazis will go extinct in the West before we do.
LikeLike
So jews are ok because they cuck white womena and by fucking those white women they get whiter each generation that passes?
LikeLike
Are you retarded?
LikeLike
Hey! When I browsed Forbes lists of the wealthiest families from recent years, I didn´t find any of the names usually considered to be at the very top of the global System pyramid (Rothschilds, Warburgs…) by people in our circles, except for Rockefellers and Goldman, and even these two were not in the top 30. Is it a deliberate concealment of truth, or is it really the case that these old banking families, which rose to prominence in 18. and 19. centuries are not as rich and powerful as they used to be?
LikeLike
The old families aren’t as powerful as they once were, replaced by their competitors. A familial bloodline can only stay at the top for so long. A guy called Gregory Clark wrote a good book on social mobility and social status through time called The Son Also Rises. You can read it in a day, I definitely recommend it.
LikeLike
Are Pontic Greeks actual descendants from Ancient Greeks that settled and mixed with the local inhabitants or are they simply hellenized (culturally assimilated) native Anatolians who adopted their langauge and customs?
LikeLike
What do you think that many browns try to use Mendel’s laws to supposedly “refute race”, saying that a recessive trait can become dominant and look “pure”?
LikeLike
I’ve never seen them use that argument.
LikeLike
Do you think eugenics policies are needed to eradicate leftism?
LikeLike
It’s the only way, leftism is genetic. They’re already anti-natalist and self-sterilize, we should encourage that behavior among them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Was playing around with g25 and noticed that the distance between Aryans (andronovo and sintashta) and Northwest Europeans is significantly less than the distance between Northwest Europeans and Northeast Europeans. Similarly, Germanic/Celtic Europe and the Proto-Iranics are more similar to each other than they are to Balts and Slavs. Yet, on PCAs Aryans cluster with Northeast Europe. What’s with the discrepancy between these two calculations?
LikeLike
IIRC it’s caused by Balto-Slavic genetic drift. All northern Europeans have near-identical autosomal ancestry, except some northeast Europeans (e.g. Finnic people and some Russians) who have more EHG-related ancestry and some Siberian ancestry.
LikeLike