This blog won’t become a democracy but I’m always interested in feedback. The only problem is that it’s impossible to keep track of feedback when it’s all buried in random articles’ comment sections. I read most comments, but all of them go in one eye and out the other because my memory sucks.
I figured that it would be easier to keep track of any requests, questions, suggestions, complaints, etc. if they were all corralled in one place: This article’s comment section.
So, I’ll be using this article as a pinned post (if I can figure out how to pin it) for a few months to see how this idea plays out. If nobody uses it then I guess I’ll just delete it or whatever but I thought it was worth trying out.
OK TY
EDIT: A note on comment “censorship”
WordPress has an autofilter that requires me to approve certain comments, which is pretty effective at filtering out the idiots. Fortunately, their comments don’t make it out of the gate and are never seen by readers.
Sometimes these idiots cry about “censorship.” So, to be clear, I generally do not approve comments that contain:
- Racial slurs (if the comment is otherwise useful I will edit the slurs out)
- Low IQ sperging
- General schizo behavior
- Essays/textwalls (I don’t have time to read your thesis, sorry)
- URL spam to weird websites
- Fringe nonsense (“Ancient Egyptians were Black”, “Ashkenazis are Turkic”, “The Ainu are Huns”, “The Israelites were White”)
- Libtard nonsense
- Rudeness / aggressiveness for no reason
- etc.
I do not censor comments for:
- Disagreeing with me
Also, sometimes I just forget to approve comments, so good replies accidentally get censored by the auto-filter.
Basically, just don’t be a freak, a doofus, or rude and your comment will be approved. “Be normal” is a perfectly reasonable standard of behavior and the vast majority of people who leave comments do so respectfully but, frankly, some of you people deserve to be censored.
Thuletide 
yeah you could get doxed that way if you use your real name for email address and have it linked to personally identifying things online
LikeLike
Hey, I just wanted to say that you’re absolutely right on china.
Unfortunately some on the right think of china as a “based” nationalist state which is opposing the israeli-american imperialism. They are naive enough to think that the oligarchs who control the west would let a nation that is not controlled by them rise to power.
China’s rise to power is engineered and calculated. It’s the result of a deliberate transfer of wealth and power from the west to the east that started decades ago and no administration does anything about it. It doesn’t take a genius to understand the process and take on china but for some reasons our leaders are unwilling to do so.
These so-called rational people don’t understand that china is as globalist as america. China is replacing america as world power and they think: how great, the controlled america is down and the world will be free, china will save us from the globalist elite! How stupid. Sometimes I wonder if these china-lovers get paid by the ccp.
Unfortunately the international capitalists who control the west are not as stupid as these people and they know that the west is declining as is the inevitable result of liberalism. So they have chosen china as their next base of operations and are economically migrating to china, which is the perfect slave state for them. CCP is their own creation and has been a semitic project from the beginning.
While these people are desperately looking for “allies” and are waiting for china to come and save them, they’re missing a great point: our strength is our own people. No one is coming to save us except us.
LikeLike
I 100% believe that they are either paid by or trying to get paid by the CCP
LikeLike
Like Nick Fuentes’ retarded fa*ot and Andrew Anglin’s loser incel.
LikeLike
Thule, what do you think of geopolitics during the 20th and 21st centuries? You seem to think that all countries are already controlled by the same International Government, but if that is the case, why are there still wars like the conflict in Ukraine? Why are there rivalries between countries? Why did the Cold War happen? Is there opposition to the globalist powers? Do they control everything? or they are still in the unfinished process to do so.
LikeLike
they basically established global governance with WW2 and everything after that has been them trying to consolidate power around the world and steer things towards a totalitarian one-world government. 20th century geopolitics was legit, basically the last time it was. but 21st century geopolitics not so much. obvious NWO does not have 100% control over nations but always pay attention to how geopolitical conflict plays into the wider globalist agenda
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know if you think that way, but it seems to me a similar situation within the Catholic Church and the rivalries between the religious orders, they have ideological and theological disputes, but they are all under the authority of the Pope and the Vatican, and it happens a similar dynamic within political parties such as the rival factions within the Democrats (bernie bros VS Clinton fans) and Republicans (Reaganites VS Trumpists VS Neocons VS Paleolibertarians).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Do you think Western countries should accept Ukrainian refugees? Obviously having white immigrants to white countries is much better than being replaced by nonwhites, but what if this openness to European refugees is then used by the left to gaslight western countries into accepting more brown refugees? “Oh we openly accepted white refugees, so you’re racist if we don’t now accept millions of Syrians and Ethiopians. ” And with how spineless modern conservatives are, I feel like they would kowtow to this rhetoric and the anti immigrant movement in Europe will be dead.
LikeLike
No I think neighboring Eastern European countries should accept Ukrainian refugees since they are more culturally compatible and the Ukrainians can more easily go home after the war.
LikeLike
I’m guessing that if I check “Notify me of new posts via email.” that refers to your Blog in general and not just posts to just this page? Please excuse my dumb question. Thanks.
LikeLike
no idea, sorry
LikeLike
Hey thule, just wanted to say that you’re doing a great job exposing the flaws of Dissident Right and I’m saying this as a former dissident. I read your article on Alexander Dugin and it was really enlightening.
One only needs to take a look at Dissident Right’s intellectual leaders to understand that it’s not a fundamentally pro-White movement. How can apologists for communism be pro-White?
Dissident right seems to be obsessed with Julius Evola and Rene Guenon too. I think it would be helpful if you write an article about them too.
To my knowledge, both had worrisome connections to secret societies (Evola had a close relationship with Maria de Naglowska who was a satanist woman and Guenon was also involved in freemasonry).
Their traditionalism isn’t about the good old traditions that often come to mind, they were occultists. Evola was notoriously anti-Christian. Both denounced western culture in favor of nihilistic eastern religions which sharply contradict the principle of struggle for life.
I think it’s safe to say that, at this point, Dissident Right is an Asian nationalist movement at its core. They try so hard to somehow connect their eastern fetishizing to politics and convince us that China is “based”, while it’s just a slave nation in the service of world jewry.
LikeLike
Agree with much of what you said but Evola called Guenon, and others like him, a retard for betraying Western traditions in favor of Eastern traditions.
LikeLike
Have you ever considered writing an article about the Uralic peoples, like Mari-El, Udmurts, Chuvash, Mordovians and Komi? Your articles on the peoples of the Caucasus, the Italians and “What is a white”, are very interesting and useful, because you cover some aspects of the history, genetics and culture of those peoples. The Uralic peoples are interesting because some of them still practice paganism today (not neo-paganism but real paganism), they don’t speak Indo-European languages but they look European. I’m curious about them, because some of them look Asian, but some of them look very European with distinctive white features like red hair.
LikeLike
to agariol- do you have any images to share or footage? would be interesting to see the Uralics – never heard of em. where do they reside
LikeLike
Yeah this! I would really appreciate an article about ethnic groups residing in Russia. Uralics/Tatars/Siberians/ethnic Russians/Caucasus/Turkic and Mongol peoples/Balts and Finns etc, the genetic makeup of the Russian population. Genetics is the coziest topic.
LikeLike
Thuletide, thanks for all the research and work you do, it’s very much appreciated just how much of a contribution you make.
I suspect that our time on the internet is limited before everything gets scrubbed, so have you thought of putting your blog posts into a print-on-demand book? I prefer physical formats anyway rather than staring at a screen and would prefer having a hard-copy when the scrubbing of the internet eventually comes.
It may involve a bit of editing, given how your blogs contain hyperlinks to other articles, but do give it some thought.
LikeLike
Thanks, a few people have asked me to write or compile a book but I have no idea how I’d do that.
Also, send me a reply to this comment with your priv telegram account and I’ll message you on mine. I won’t publish the comment, to keep your priv tg secret. Would be good to have contact beyond reposting on tg.
LikeLike
Pinning is best done through a desktop interface via a user with administrator rights.
Where it shows up depends upon the platform. I use the Kotatogram version as I don’t like the endless updates and changes to layout. I have no idea where it is for you, which may also vary by OS.
LikeLike
Coming by to say that the TRShills are literally making up BS. God, I honestly haven’t even heard of them until the article you posted recently going over Duginism and how the DR is rife with Duginist whackos (idk if it’s recent, but I read it recently). Of course they’re going to say something like that to discredit you (a handful of legitimate DR people) and prevent their followers from even going to check your blogs/posts out. JFC a single 30 second scan through your wordpress refutes everything they said in the clip you posted in your TG channel. Even without your reading your article on Duginism, if I heard these guys podcast I’d still think something was supicious/they were fake because in that 2 minute clip they constantly screeched about Jews in that… glowie fed fashion. Not sure how else to call it.
Either way, you’re awesome, TRS is fake and gay. Keep up the good work, Thule.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Douglas Arthur Wayne
LikeLike
I wanted to ask about “A Race-By-Race Breakdown of Human Genetic Diversity” and the admixture analysis. Has anyone tried doing more steps than 20? What if you set K=100, or K=1000? Where can I find this kind of data?
LikeLike
it’s possible to do a K=100 or k=1000 unsupervised admixture analysis but it kinda becomes a bit pointless if you go too high. for example, if you used k=1000 with this many samples, then each population would be split into their own cluster and it wouldnt tell you anything about how different groups relate to one another
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for responding.
I guess I was expecting that more steps would eventually reveal a split within Iran between the more ‘Aryan-like’ and the more ‘Elamite-like’ people, or has that already been shown by the divergence between Vedid and Elamid? In which case, Iranians are overall far more ‘Elamite-like’ than they are ‘Aryan-like’? What exactly are the Vedids then if they were clustered with Dravidid and Elamid before and had only a tiny amount of Nordid? Also would it be right to say that Dravidid represents the Harappan (Meluḫḫa/mlecchá/Brahui/Balochi) component?
I was wondering where you think ancient populations would fit into this schema, like Sumerians, Egyptians, and BMAC people, before historical admixture. Wouldn’t these people have much less of the Semid/East Asiatid components than people in those regions have today? In which case they would be somewhere between Medid and Elamid. Where would ancestral Turks fall?
LikeLike
What is your opinion about “Don’t Say gay” bill? This situation seems worrying to me, there is a lot of outrage within leftists and many people because toddlers can’t learn gay and trannie propaganda before 4th grade, but after 4th grade they can be indoctrinated to take puberty blockers, take hormones and remove healthy body parts, like testicles, breast, uterus and penis.
They are upset because they couldn’t indoctrinate kindergarten children, but If You view the situation in a general way, You could see indoctrination is everywhere and is not outlawed anywhere in american territory.
Today youth seems Lost, maybe not in eastern european countries, but western Europe and anglosphere seems lost. You can’t talk about restricting invasive medical procedures in children without being labeled as a Nazi.
To prove my point, we could see most recent polls about sexual orientation with zoomers, in America LGBT+ zoomers are 20% of people in their age range. I guess the majority of them are whites.
There is a lot of trannie craze, especially among teen females with exploding numbers of young females taking testosterone.
Do You think white youth could be saved?
Are LGBT stastics reliable? Or they inflate their numbers as propaganda tool?
Is homeschooling a viable way to educate children?
Do whites tend to be more LGBT than POC?
Are young females condemn to be infertile due to the rise on Female to Male trannies?
LikeLike
Do You think white youth could be saved?
Yes
Are LGBT stastics reliable?
No
Or they inflate their numbers as propaganda tool?
Yes
Is homeschooling a viable way to educate children?
Yes
Do whites tend to be more LGBT than POC?
No
Are young females condemn to be infertile due to the rise on Female to Male trannies?
Yes
Pendulum is swinging back though so I’m not too worried
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could you do an article regarding the genetic makeup of India and its various subgroups? Obviously they have inherited an indo-european language and at least some culture like us and was wondering how similar they are genetically. There is a lot of contentious debate about them due to India’s hatred of colonialism and frankly geneticists not giving clear answers to avoid controversy.
LikeLike
India has too many subgroups and I always forget their names but basically all Indians have ancestry from a few populations:
1. Native Indian hunter-gatherers who were most similar to modern Andamanese Islanders, like Onge and Jarawa. They inhabited all of India first during the Paleolithic.
2. Iranian Hunter-Gatherers who moved into Northwest India to form the Indus Valley Civilization. They mixed with the hunter-gatherers but had mostly Iranian ancestry.
3. European ancestry from the Sintashta/Andronovo culture, which was almost identical to modern Northern Europeans.
And some Indians have extra ancestry from BMAC (Iranian Farmers), West Siberian Hunter-Gathers (like the early Tarim mummies), East Asian, or Southeast Asian. Depends on the population.
More northwest = more Iranian and European ancestry
More south = more native Indian hunter-gatherer ancestry
More east/northeast = more Asian ancestry
Indo-Aryans have up to 30% European ancestry and much Iranian ancestry.
Dravidians have much less European ancestry, often none at all.
Munda people have no European ancestry and only small amounts of Iranian.
Andamanese people have no Iranian or European ancestry and are probably very similar to original Indian hunter-gatherers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
hey do you have the greentext thats like, 99.999 percent of people who ever existed would be considered far right extremists/nazis today?
LikeLike
no but you posted basically the entire greentext here
LikeLike
What are your thoughts on the whole Hungary/Bulgaria debate? There’s an argument over whether or not the founding populations of modern Bulgaria/Hungary (Bulgars/Magyars) were of East Asian Turkic descent or Slavs/Thracians/etc., Pan-Turkics/Turanists claim it to take credit for the accomplishments of course and libshits do it to perpetuate their usual “Europe was always a diverse haven :^)” nonsense, but as far as I can tell the only indication they were of any asiatic descent is that their culture absorbed vaguely Turkic aspects and the Hungarian language being an Uralic language.
There’s even debate over whether or not the Basarab dynasty of Romania, the one Dracula is descended from, was originally of Cuman (Turkic) origin, but that’s even more doubtful it seems.
LikeLike
afaik both populations were just local europeans who got conquered by a small elite of foreigners, and they share minimal ancestry with this foreign population. it’s like modern turkish people claiming to be “turkic.” dont know much about bulgaria but in hungary haplogroup N (uralic) is only around 5%, and they have a tiny, tiny amount of east asian DNA that is undetectable in some models. turanism is pathetic LARP
LikeLike
So while reading through your telegram posts, i saw your post about infighting (post 2638) and I was wondering what you are referring to with here:
“Saying that they want our entire civilization to be burned to the ground because le tribal hunter-gatherer LARP”
I have never seen anyone talk about anything like this and I listen to several different podcasts and read several different DR outlets. I have no idea as to how an argument on this topic can be made, much less become an often enough thing that people talk about, that you even named it.
LikeLike
I was just caricaturing anarcho-primitivism collapse cult
LikeLike
Is there any solid evidence on when the Caucasian, europid, West Eurasian, white or whatever someone wants to call it phenotype emerged? Obviously most would consider the proto-Indo-Europeans to be the progenitors of the current “white race” because of the cultural and genetic inheritance of modern white people, but we know other groups that were already living in Europe had a white phenotype, as well as incredibly old populations such as the ancient north Eurasians. I was also reading an article today about the old, not mutated R1a haplogroup that is possibly 10,000 years old. Then of course there’s the Cro-Magnons. It’s confusing for myself being a laymen because so many different terms are used, which aren’t very descriptive, for the same groups of people, and there are vastly different depictions of ancient people groups seemingly dependent on political motivation.
LikeLike
I’m not sure when the Europid/Caucasoid phenotype originated, it’s a question I’ve wondered too. I have seen Gravettian and Aurignacian reconstructions that already look obviously Caucasoid by ~30,000 BC.
“Cro-Magnon” is basically just a catch-all term for all pre-Neolithic people in Europe
LikeLike
Hi, I may soon assume the editorship of a small weekly paper and would like to inquire about putting your content in print on occasion. Would you kindly email me? Thanks.
LikeLike
you can plagiarize and edit anything I post on any platform without crediting me. I check my emails like once a year so not the best way to get in touch tbh
LikeLike
I awaited your email only to come back and find this gigabased comment. What’s the best way to ping you? This thread?
LikeLike
yes or you can DM me on gab 🙂
LikeLike
Speaking of Dugin recently, I was pondering the next few years of the GR agenda and recalled Dugins prediction of the breakup of America into regions a few years ago. (Dugin usa breakup). Martin Armstrong Socrates predicts WWIII in 2025-2027 (we are in the pregame). So for Agenda2030, it seems NATO loses to the new “Axis” and will be treated like the old Axis powers post 2030. No military, territories broken up, UN appointed regional governance, occupying peacekeepers from other countries. My prediction for the USA specifically is we will look like Afghanistan in SOME places due to 2A culture ( unless the mind control is more total than I think, which is very possible)
LikeLike
What do you think about Neanderthal and human mixing in the Levant? Do modern Levantines and Arabs have high levels of Neanderthal dna? I noticed that some phenotypes are similar between modern populations in this region and Neanderthals (sloped forehead, prognathism). Is this just a coincidence? What do you think about the half Neanderthal skull found in an Israeli cave:
https://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-humans-neanderthals-20150128-story.html
There’s also the Canaanite skull that was found:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-28/ancient-dna-shows-canaanites-survived-biblical-slaughter/8749264
To me it looks like it has somewhat Neanderthal-like features (elongated, large).
I am also aware that really ancient Europeans mixed with Neanderthals. I am guessing this was Cro-Magnon? How much Neanderthal dna do you think this population had?
On another note, I am also curious about what you think about the genealogy of Aboriginals. Why do they look so different from their closest relatives, the Andamanese? Is evolution really that fast or is it because of the archaic hominin dna they picked up on their way to Australia?
LikeLike
Modern Levantines probably have lower levels of Neanderthal ancestry than other groups because they have very high Basal Eurasian ancestry (which is very early Eurasian population with no Neanderthal admixture), up to 50% or something.
The phenotypic similarities are probably just coincidence or a result of adaptation to a similar environment.
Australians have been genetically isolated for a long time but they may have additional archaic hominin DNA, like the Papuans. I haven’t really looked into it before. Andamanese have 25-50% East Asian ancestry too, depending on the model used, so that’s why they look quite East Asian. There is also a theory that Andamanese are actually a form of “Basal East Asian” and not related to Australians but I don’t buy it.
LikeLike
I’m not sure if my prior comment actually went through, but I can confirm that when the rehabilitation of Hitler fails to gain any ground (nobody wants to be associated with him, no matter how much time and enthusiasm you commit to their needs), it becomes extremely tempting to turn to accelerationism.
Of course, there are many issues with terrorism, such as: 1) most of it remains manufactured by the US government, it’s unlikely that it can even fester organically without being nipped in the bud by their intelligence agencies; 2) it doesn’t inspire the masses to revolt, nobody in their right mind would follow a mass-murderer; 3) it provides justifications for more repressive laws, an opportunity for chaos, like how the great powers used Ferdinand’s assassination as a pretext for war; 4) it can scarcely put a dent into the democratic system, in which they can quickly find another willing accomplice to take the place of the assassinated statesman.
____
So, what are the actual political solutions?
I personally don’t think it consists of imitating other political movements (the great folly of Fascists). Hitler searched for a party that had yet to crystallize into a large organization.
When an organization becomes an end in itself, it ceases to be a spiritual force. Many foundations are more concerned with preserving their founder’s image and dictating how their legacy should be interpreted.
You’ll be hard-pressed to find any independent, non-bureaucratic academics or scientists who aren’t afraid of sacrificing their career. I prefer searching for amateurs.
>Trying to court some of the more “based” elites
Isn’t that what Adam Weishaupt sought to do?
“Organizing activism with parents”, along with educational reforms, remains a viable option. The greater challenge is curbing the power of the democratic press.
LikeLike
Are Ancient North Eurasians the oldest example of the white phenotype that is known? Or in other words, how old, based on current limited evidence, is this phenotype?
LikeLike
hard to say. they were definitely caucasoid and the genes for white skin likely originated among them. they also had the earliest genes for european blond hair (which is genetically distinct from melanesian blond hair). if they were not the first to have white skin, then candidates are the eastern hunter-gatherers (75% ane), caucasus hunter-gatherers (40% ane), and anatolian neolithic farmers (maybe had some trace ANE ancestry but not likely). either way, the “white” phenotype definitely evolved at some point before neolithic and likely before the mesolithic. it definitely existed during the mesolithic in EHG, ANF, and CHG
LikeLike
We’re the moors that conquered Spain black?
LikeLike
no, they were definitely not black. they were originally north africans, like berbers, but they quickly intermixed with native iberians and became half native iberian, half north african.
check this study from the sentence starting “In the southeast, we recovered genomic data from 45 individuals” :
Click to access nihms-1019025.pdf
north africans do have 10-25% sub-saharan african-related admixture. the rest is levant natufian related (40-50%) and early european farmer related (25-30%) with some other random small percentages from yamnaya, iranian farmers, etc.
north africans actually have more yamnaya ancestry than spanish or portugese have north african ancestry.
LikeLike
What is your opinion about J.F.Gariepy debate with Vaush, discussing Race Realism and tranny agenda?
LikeLike
havent watched it, got a link?
LikeLike
Yes, here is
LikeLike
What is a “Thuletide” and why are you called that? What does that word mean?
LikeLike
“thule” is from greek mythology, the capital of hyperborea, and I use it as a reference to the ancient north eurasians, who lived in arctic regions of the far north in eurasia and were the forefarthers of the proto-indo-europeans. “tide” is from yuletide. so basically its just a pun
LikeLike
Greetings! First off, thanks for all the great work! Thuletide is totally needed and I can hope you guys keep it up and grow influence in the nets. But also I request you to take a look at the enemy’s latest ideological and “intellectual” currents, that is, deconstruction theory and what’s beyond this madness of a philosophical thought which is the basis of what we are facing today.
I want you guys to get updated into this matter because I saw recent posts still relating to cultural marxism (Frankfurt schools et al), which is not totally wrong, but an outdated school of thought which was surpassed by deconstructionists. Everything related to cultural marxism was made up from around 100 years ago, the Frankfurt school spread since then, they reviewed their theories and evolved, then Foucault, Derridá and other radicals took those foundations to work on a new school of thought which is what we are facing today on schools, academia, media, BLM and many other collectives.
This sophisticated process of post marxist subvertion has taken most political paeties and positions, as you have seen recently on conservatives, alt right, etc. So now the enemy is not marxism at all, not just liberals, not just the funny nosed tribe, not just that, but every subverted individual or group that has been already deconstructed. And I am shocked and deeply worried that most “counter current” movements and even the intellectuals behind them have not noticed this and are still fighting cultural marxism, which is the grandfather of today’s new process. Due this situation, since virtually nobody noticed them before, the deconstructionists have been successful with their process, spreading without any serious resistance against. That’s why I urge you to cautionly study and learn more about this, and be prepared to resist the mental deprogramation involved in this theory. Once you have done it, just like I suppose you have already studied Marx, Money, Vezmenov, etc, you should be able to disable them and counter the ongoing revolution against us. Best of luck and I really hope you take this urgent request.
LikeLike
Hi, TY for the kind words. Postmodernists were covered in some articles earlier, but I forgot which ones.
LikeLike
These two are more well known but still worth including as obvious examples of mass cultural brainwashing
LikeLike
Hello, I have enjoyed reading your work and I am curious if you have any information or commentary regarding this theory that “racism” against black Africans was only invented, by white Europeans, within the past several hundred years, as evidenced by depictions of them in European and other ancient art- which should override written histories that can be more easily edited and revised. Along with the concurrent proposition that Africans were far more heavily integrated into earlier Western cultures. I believe this concept (racism invented by whites relatively recently) is something you may have touched on previously, but perhaps not within this context (the art world).
http://www.imageoftheblack.com/index.html
https://www.sdmart.org/event/the-world-before-racism-an-art-story/
Thank you!
LikeLike
the idea that racism was invented by whites is just dumb and can be debunked by basically any writing or ethnography from the past. e.g., jews and muslims thought that black people had dark pigmentation because they were cursed by god https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_Ham#Early_Judaism_and_Islam
the idea that africans were integrated into europe in the past is just insane historical revisionism that has never been proven by any empirical data whatsoever. it’s literally just a bunch of schizo libtard classicists making stuff up. whenever any of these ancient individuals who are claimed to be black actually get genetically tested, it always turns out that they were just middle easterners or even europeans
LikeLike
Why do you think it is that men with more testosterone tend to have higher crime rates?
LikeLike
more aggresive and more prone to taking risks
LikeLike
What’s up with the white, blonde and red haired mummies in egypt? When looking over genetic studies the population has seemed to not change all that much into the modern era besides some additional sub sub Saharan admixture in the modern population. If there was possibly an Indo-European ruling class at some point why have they seemingly left little cultural impact as opposed to other regions?
LikeLike
there was a greek ruling class in egypt, the ptolemaic dynasty, and some older egyptian dynasties married european elites, such as the mitanni (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitanni#Artatama_I_and_Shuttarna_II) who’s elites descended from andronovo people who had light skin hair and eyes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture#Genetics). but the “red” hair of egyptian mummies is more likely to be a product of hair dye, like henna, or something to do with decomposition process. the mystery could be solved by genetic testing the “red haired” mummies but idk if anyone has done that
LikeLike
Hey, I want to thank you for your thorough research first, it gave me a lot of valuable insights I didn’t consider before. I’ve been following you for a few years now, please keep it up, even though my views tend to be sometimes different than yours due to your American point of view. Now to my question: I don’t exactly remember how much you wrote about the effects the vaxx has on the body, especially the female one, and I was worrying about it for a while since my girlfriend is unfortunately vaxxed (she regrets it quite a lot). We are also planning to have kids at some point, so I’m anxious about the implications the vaxx might have on the development of children and the reproductive organs as a whole. I’m unvaxxed (god bless), but I think some definitive clearance about the development of kids with a vaxxed parent is needed, since I struggled to find some answers for that on my own, probably also due to the fact that vaccine damages have been largely memoryholed/partially normalized. Thanks for all your hard work.
LikeLike
I’ve been keeping an eye out for data like this myself but it seems to be pretty elusive. I haven’t seen a single study on long term vaccine side effects, other than the pfizer side effects data release which was basically an encyclopedia of ailments.
LikeLike
What are your thoughts on this article (https://archive.ph/Odl93)? It contains a lot of studies that I have not seen commented on the right as of yet.
LikeLike
No time to read it all but I can already tell it’s disingenous garbage since the first point intentionally ignores “per capita” and uses the argument that “more straight people molest kids in total therefore gay people are less likely to molest kids”
LikeLike
Good point. I hope you or someone else could shed some more light on such science and go over the rest, as our work on LGBT pales in comparison to other topics such as racialism.
LikeLike
Hello, are you gonna publish the new reading list for 2022 anytime soon?
LikeLike
maybe, haven’t read any books lately so wouldnt have much to add. mighht remove some stuff though
LikeLike
Do you have nonwhite friends? If so, are they aware of your political views, and what do they think of them?
LikeLike
Can you make an article debunking the claims on the claims of christian identity? In a nutshell they believe Ancient Israelites were europeans, Jesus was an Aryan because he was born in Galilee, Jews being “canonites”, etc.
I’d like to see some data on ancient Israelite DNA compared to modern day Palestine, and Europe. I’m tired of these silly larpers disregarding genetic data and making insane false claims on the internet that they’re the real jews.
Thanks, and apologies if you’ve already covered this.
LikeLike
Maybe this?
LikeLike
Are there any studies on ancient Israelite DNA vs modern populations, European, Jewish, and Palestinian?
LikeLike
idk but here is a list of the top 10 closest related modern populations to ancient levantine peoples dating from the mesolithic to antiquity. the only ones who are remotely european are the philistines, who were half european descended from south euro immigrants https://i.imgur.com/TfkNfXl.jpg
LikeLike
Is it accurate to classify Hazaras as Central Asian? According to Wikipedia they cluster closely with Uzbeks, and are closely related to Uyghurs.
LikeLike
Yeah they’re Central Asians.
LikeLike
1. Which is more closely related to Europeans, North Africans or Middle Easterners?
2. Since they are both Caucasoids, do you think Europeans and MENAs should have a sense of kinship?
LikeLike
middle easterners are significantly more related because north africans, e.g. berbers, have up to 25% or more admixture from sub-saharan africans, but in the middle east it’s generally 5% or less, and often 0%
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve seen claims made many times in mainstream of common and open homosexuality or bisexuality in Greek, Roman, and Macedonian societies. For example people claiming that Alexander the Great was bi or the Spartans were homosexual. Of course most on the right deny this. What does the evidence look like in either direction?
LikeLike
homosexuality existed but it was not common or culturally accepted, it was viewed with revulsion and there were many laws against homosexuality. this is simply historical revisionism by pervert leftist “historians” similar to contemporary claims that vikings were “transgender” and so on. the origin of this bullshit is pervert communists like Havelock Ellis
this is a good article on the subject: https://telegra.ph/Homosexuality-and-Pederasty-in-the-Ancient-and-Pagan-Worldview-13—Hellenes-and-Vedic-India-10-18
“of the 80,000 or so ancient vases found in Greece, only 600 illustrate what could be interpreted as a homosexual scene. Of these, only about thirty have been identified as infallibly representing homosexuality, the rest having only been considered as “implying” homosexuality, the majority of which may moreover have come from the same “artist””
LikeLike
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425765/#:~:text=The%20mean%20IQ%20score%20in,years%20of%20age%20is%20105.61.
According to this, the avg IQ for Iranians is 97, and 106 amongst 20+ y/os specifically. This contradicts Lynn’s estimate of 84. Any thoughts?
LikeLike
Hey T, I’m originally from western Austria and my haplogroup is G2A, quite a few of my friends are as well. Was a surprise to me to discover that haplogroup to be common in Georgia (Caucasus). If you cover more of these topics, would love to read on the nuances of this phenomenon. Thanks for your hard work and all you do. Cheers
LikeLike
G2a is the most common Early European Farmer haplogroup. So, it shows that you come from a male lineage that somehow survived the Indo-European invasion that exterminated almost all Early European Farmer lineages across much of Europe.
Maybe G2a originated in the Caucasus or maybe Anatolia. Hard to say, because the ancestors of Early European Farmers (originally from Anatolia) and Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers belonged to the same West Asian metapopulation during the Paleolithic. This population was not very distinct from Paleolithic Europeans, except that it had ancestry from a ghost population called “Basal Eurasian.”
The ancestors of EEF and CHG diverged 20,000 years ago or more. After these populations diverged, the ancestors of EEF recieved admixture from European hunter-gatherers and the ancestors of CHG recieved admixture from Ancient North Eurasians.
LikeLike
Tatars(nation in a volga region) is Whyte?
LikeLike
they are mostly White but can have sigificant East Asian ancestry and I think they would identify as Turkic and not European
LikeLike
Two random questions:
1. Were hephthalites actually white?
2. How admixed are tajiks, pamiris, and wakhis?
LikeLike
1. Hephthalites were almost certainly an East Iranian people, so they were as White as the inhabitants of Sogdia and Bactria during the early Middle Ages. We have a few samples of probable East Iranian peoples from that approximate region dating to the Iron Age and Middle Ages. They were about half European, one third native Iranian (BMAC), with some additional East Asian Siberian ancestry. I guess they would look similar to modern day Pamiris, but with a higher percentage of White phenotypes.
2. That depends what you mean by “admixed”. Every ethinc group is admixed because all people descend from mixes of previous people.
Here is a very basic model :
Sintashta = White, Tarim = Ancient North Eurasian, Gonur = Iranian/BMAC, Khovsgol = Siberian
LikeLike
Are modern Egyptians the same race as ancient Egyptians?
LikeLike
yes but with slightly more admixture from various places around the world, but not that much
LikeLike
How were Caucasus Hunter Gatherers not a white population if they evolved in within the boundaries of Europe and were phenotypically European. You mentioned the Caucasus Hunter Gatherers were more closely related to Iranian Noeolithic Farmers than European populations such as Early European Farmers/Anatolian Neolithic Farmers which dosen’t make any sense because the most common phenotype among North Caucasians (Georgians,Chechens,Avars,Circassians etc) is the Mtebid phenotype which is most similar to the Dinarid and Carpathid phenotypes in the Balkans. You can search at humanphenotypes.com to compare them. You also mentioned the North Caucasian population looks white because of “genotype and phenotype mismatch” which is illogical because the most predominant type of autosomal dna determines your phenotype otherwise there would be Sub Saharan Africans with mostly european autosomal dna retaining their Negroid morphology and vice versa which would completely invalidate race realism.
LikeLike
Geography =/= genetics and CHG were not phenotypically European they were phenotypically Caucasian, which is not the same thing.
“Genotype/phenotype mismatch” is just a simplified way of saying if you look at how they genetically cluster and admixture analysis then they would appear to be most closely related to populations like Iranians and Turks. But they commonly have a couple of pheotype genes that are near-ubiquitous throughout Europe, making them look “Whiter” than Iranians and Turks.
LikeLike
What’s your opinion on European presence in prehistoric America? There’s many fair haired mummies and caucazoid looking skulls. Theres the chachapoyas statues. There’s the accounts of the conquistadors. Many people use these to claim South America had a white ruling class. Do you think this has more to do with some groups having higher amounts of ANE DNA or is it actually European presence?
LikeLike
The “caucasoid” skulls can easily be explained with high ANE DNA, as we already saw with Kennewick man. ANE DNA is even higher in South America. Dye can easily be used to lighten hair and the mummification process also lightens hair too as the pigment decays. But the tales I’ve heard of blond-haired people acting as a ruling class or gods cannot be explained by these things. It’s an interesting subject, but hard to distinguish schizoposting from factual evidence. Many years ago I was interested in this sort of Aryan pseudohistory stuff, but our actual 100% proven history is interesting enough without having to kangz LARP like deracinated Africans.
LikeLike
Hey Thule, Mestizo fan of yours here & first off thx so much for the work you do in providing those of us who didn’t fall for the “race is made-up” bullshit w/ the ammo that we need.
I basically wanted to ask if Amerindians are the same race as East Asian — Mongoloid or if they form their own distinct ancestral continuum & are only closely RELATED to East Asian Mongoloids.
I realize there’re some Amerindian groups who strongly resemble & can easily be mistaken for East Asians but then there’re those who make Amerindians seem like their own race.
So are Amerindians their own separate race distinct from East Eurasian Mongoloids & constitute the 5th, 6th or 7th race found among humans? Or are they the same exact race similar to how Europeans & Middle Easterners are essentially the same race w/ some differences?
LikeLike
Hello. You could technically group Amerindians under the “East Eurasian” umbrella, but it makes the most sense to classify them as a distinct race. Amerindians descend from a mix of Caucasoid Ancient North Eurasians and an East Asian Siberian population from around the Amur Basin. After this mixing took place in Eurasia, they migrated to America and were genetically isolated for something like 20,000 years (I forget the actual timescale), which is more than enough to diverge into a distinct subspecies population.
North Amerindians have more East Asian-related ancestry (due to additional migrations from Siberia), while South Amerindians have more ANE ancestry. If I recall, some South Amerindians have up to half ANE ancestry. It’s this ANE ancestry that gives all Amerindians their unique look and distinguishes them from other East Asians. This article contains some potential images of Ancient North Eurasian faces. Easy to see the similarities to Amerindians:
LikeLike
What do you think about this study and similar studies?
https://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845100/
LikeLike
I think that there is some truth to them, in that low IQ people are more likely to be “bigoted.” However, very high IQ are also more likely to be “bigoted”, while midwits are more likely to think what they’ve been told to think (“we’re all equal” and so on). There are more far low IQ people than very high IQ people, so the average IQ of “bigots” is probably lower. This will change in coming years, because leftists are not reproducing, so the highest echolons of society will become “biologically conservative” in the coming decades. Leftism will be (correctly) viewed as a low status, low IQ trait.
LikeLike
Did you block my account? If so, what was the reason.
LikeLike
how am I supposed to know which account is yours if you don’t post the username? I should block you right now for wasting my time
LikeLike
I did have the same username,which is also called E to remain anonymous.however, I used a different email since I wasnt able to send my reply to your comment concerning the North Caucasians.
LikeLike
Not to be a Nordicist, but why do Slavs and Meds have a lower IQ than Germanics?
LikeLike
Pols and Northern Italians have very high IQ’s iirc.
LikeLike
selection pressures I presume. seems also that higher proto-indo-european admixture is correlated with IQ. in the case of the east slavs, maybe because of communism. our IQ is being obliterated though so its probably not worth bragging about, we will be sigificantly more retarded than they are within a few generations if dysgenic trends continue
LikeLike
Out of curiosity, do you view the moment everything went wrong as WW2, or do you think, even with an axis victory, we would still be in a mess today?
LikeLike
things were going wrong before WW2, but we wouldnt have immigration, globalist organizations like the UN, and social degeneracy if the axis won
LikeLike