This blog won’t become a democracy but I’m always interested in feedback. The only problem is that it’s impossible to keep track of feedback when it’s all buried in random articles’ comment sections. I read most comments, but all of them go in one eye and out the other because my memory sucks.
I figured that it would be easier to keep track of any requests, questions, suggestions, complaints, etc. if they were all corralled in one place: This article’s comment section.
So, I’ll be using this article as a pinned post (if I can figure out how to pin it) for a few months to see how this idea plays out. If nobody uses it then I guess I’ll just delete it or whatever but I thought it was worth trying out.
OK TY
EDIT: A note on comment “censorship”
WordPress has an autofilter that requires me to approve certain comments, which is pretty effective at filtering out the idiots. Fortunately, their comments don’t make it out of the gate and are never seen by readers.
Sometimes these idiots cry about “censorship.” So, to be clear, I generally do not approve comments that contain:
- Racial slurs (if the comment is otherwise useful I will edit the slurs out)
- Low IQ sperging
- General schizo behavior
- Essays/textwalls (I don’t have time to read your thesis, sorry)
- URL spam to weird websites
- Fringe nonsense (“Ancient Egyptians were Black”, “Ashkenazis are Turkic”, “The Ainu are Huns”, “The Israelites were White”)
- Libtard nonsense
- Rudeness / aggressiveness for no reason
- etc.
I do not censor comments for:
- Disagreeing with me
Also, sometimes I just forget to approve comments, so good replies accidentally get censored by the auto-filter.
Basically, just don’t be a freak, a doofus, or rude and your comment will be approved. “Be normal” is a perfectly reasonable standard of behavior and the vast majority of people who leave comments do so respectfully but, frankly, some of you people deserve to be censored.
Thuletide 
Why are some Turks White-passing? Hasan for example looks White (at least in the eyes of the public) enough to the point where most people just assume he is.
Also used to have 2 Turkish classmates that had looked incredibly Nordic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
they have a lot of genetic overlap with europeans, descending from anatolian farmers and caucasus hunter-gatherers, who had light skin pigmentation and sometimes light hair and eye colors. plus they also imported a lot of european slaves during the ottoman era and did a lot of raping, so they will have some european phenotype genes for that reason too
LikeLike
There’s a lot of Circassians in Turkey (three million if IIRC) which look and act incredibly similar to Europeans (they are from the North Caucasus). Used to be a very reliable Russian ally but most converted to Islam for some reason in the early 18th century and the Russian Empire cut off all ties and started invaded the Caucasus to prevent them from becoming an Ottoman ally. Over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries as the Russians gradually took over the Caucasus they were very stern with Circassians and forced them to move en masse to Anatolia. After the end of the Napoleonic wars, the Russians completed their conquest of the Caucasus up to modern Soviet borders with Iran and Turkey. Circassians at this point were very pro-Turkish and actively resisted any attempt from Russians to liberate the region from Ottoman rule so the Russians deported them all (and did commit some severe undeserved atrocities against them I might add) to Turkey over the course of about 40 years. I would say that in this case the Russians did have a good reason to hate the Circassians since they sided with Russia (and Europe’s) main rival at the time and it was because of concentrated European effort that the Muslim Empire was destroyed.
LikeLike
Hey Thuletide,
Remember that Amazon Prime Video “Rings of Power” series? Well the actors leaked that it was never intended to be an extension of nor true to the literature which Tolkein wrote. In fact, it was explicitly intended to “erase” it in favor of modernity.
To quote – https://boundingintocomics.com/2022/07/25/the-lord-of-the-rings-the-rings-of-power-actors-confirm-show-aims-to-erase-tolkiens-work-for-the-sake-of-modernity/
“The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power actors completely stripped away any kind of façade that might have been built for the Prime Video series that it would be faithful to Tolkien’s literary work. Instead they made it abundantly clear that the show is dedicated to modernity in spite of Tolkien’s work and his clear criticisms of it.”
LikeLike
thanks for the tip
LikeLike
How significant is the north-south “whiteness” shift in France and Spain? As stark as in Italy? Because I noticed a huge difference between north/south French (Franks influences?) and also to a lesser degree catalonian/castillian Spaniards (some mixture with north africans perhaps). Also how white are they in total compared to Central Europeans and Italians?
LikeLike
in Spain I noticed no difference whever I went, but I didnt visit many cities. In france I noticed a difference between northerners and southerners, with average south French looking similar to Spaniards and Italians. But everywhere I visited in France seemed to have high frequencies of more Mediterranean looking people, even in Paris. French are the same as other Central Europeans but southern Italians do have some Near Eastern admixture. Not a huge amount maybe like 15% or something. I cant really remember
LikeLike
It Dosen’t make any logical sense how North Caucasians are supposedly genetically closer to Iranians and Turks than to southeastern Europeans when most of them are much more phenotypically similar to Albanians and Greeks.The predominant genes found in autosomal dna always determines ones phenotype with 100% accuracy, which is why you will never find a quadroon who looks mostly Negroid. If some of the information presented in a prinicipal component analysis contradicts empirical reality (that North Caucasians are closer to Iranians and Turks despite being way more similar to southeastern Europeans morphologically),then you must be skeptical of the data having any validity. I read an article of yours a while back called Out Of Africa Theory and the origin of the Australian and Melanesian aboriginals. There you made arguments against the consensus of the two aforementioned populations being a branch of East Eurasians by using arguments such as “The big problem with this theory is that it dosen’t pass a simple visual inspection. It completely violates basic common sense. Phenotypically, Australoids are as different from East Asians as they are from Europeans. Physically, they are far closer to Sub Saharan Africans, to the point that they could be easily mistaken as Africans by the untrained eye”. I’m perplexed to how you didn’t apply the same standard of skeptisim by questioning the validity of the North Caucasians being part of the the West Asian race despite admitting that “many North Caucasians would not look out if place in Europe”
LikeLike
stop reposting this comment you doofus I’ve answered it already :
Europeans and North Caucasians descend from the some of the same ancestral populations and share some of the same phenotype genes (white skin, light eyes, light hair) that they inherited from these ancestral populations. That doesn’t mean that a North Caucasian is autosomally closer to Europeans than they are to Turks and Iranians, with whom they share far more ancestry.
Many Iranian Pamiris from Tajikistan look like Anglos but that doesn’t mean Pamiris are autosomally closer to Anglos than to other Iranians or that they genetically cluster with Anglos. They just share Proto-Indo-European ancestry, which contains genes for light pigmentation and European facial features.
LikeLike
I never once insulted you, so there is no need to call me a doofus for disagreeing with your dogmatism. By accepting that the North Caucasians are not European just because a PCA and an admixture chart says so even when it directly conflicts with empirical reality, you are commiting the appeal to authority fallacy. All of the PCAs and admixture bar charts you present are all made by David Reich (a Jew) and his shabbos goys. I believe that David Reich purposely in a deceptive manner labeled the Caucasus Hunter Gathere admxiture as being non-European and being related to Iranian Neolithic Farmers in order to justify flooding all of Europe with non-white migrants because according to his “studies”, all Europeans have this supposedly non white CHG admixture anyway so he is using it as a pretext to mix whites out of existence. You have called out David Reich for being a liar in an article of yours called Naughty David Reich of Harvard genetics lab caught telling lies in 2021 lecture. So why do believe anything Reich says at all in his lectures and studies if he’s a blatant liar who cannot be trusted.
LikeLike
you are a doofus because you ask the same question time and time again after I answered it already. many studies found that CHG is closely related to Iranian Neolithics, they just had different pigmentation phenotypes . first you claim that Caucasians are White, then you claim that actually the evil Jewish geneticist made CHG non-White as a hoax, so which is it? stop wasting my time with silly nonsense
LikeLike
On the topic of Pamiris, I calculated their Proto Indo-European, East European Mesolithic, West European Mesolithic and Anatolian Neolithic admixtures and the results are 60% in Tajik_Rushan, 55% in Tajik_Shugnan and 60.4% in Tajik_Yaghnobi. This proves my argument that the predominant type of autosomal dna does indeed determine your phenotype. In conclusion, Pamiris are phenotypically European because more than half of their dna is of European origin.
LikeLike
Why are Guanches white? I’ve heard a few theories about EEF migrating there, but wanted your opinion.
LikeLike
Guanches got wiped out didn’t they? dont really know much about them but pretty sure they were just regular Berbers. I also dont know if they were actually white or if that is a myth. Maybe there was some sexual selection or mutation that gave them white skin over time
LikeLike
I had two unrelated genetic questions:
1. I read a few of your articles regarding Rome and Italian genetics in which you stated that the admixture with Middle Eastern populations was very low and in most cases non-existent. Yet in your article about Corded Ware admixture, when you add up all of the admixture from various middle eastern sources, many Italian and Greek populations can have up to 12-25% ancestry from the middle east. Could you clarify?
2. Do you have any resources or information regarding the genetic impact the Anglo-Saxon migrations had on the British Isles? Was it as significant as traditionally believed?
LikeLike
1. yea the studies I saw at the time said that was the case, but after making my own models with vahaduo data, it does seem that south italians and greek islanders can have some significant middle eastern ancestry. the only other explanation is that the samples from vahaduo are biased in some way to be more middle eastern shifted, or if the PCA model is doing some weird stuff. idk though
2. no, they were going to publish a study but I think it got delayed. difficult to estimate it because NW europeans are so genetically similar to each other
LikeLike
Is it known when this middle eastern admixture occurred? (late roman empire maybe? or has this always been apart of the Italian and Greek ethnic groups?)
This also leads to further questions about if other European peoples should intermix with them. I know many southern-Italian descended Americans try to distance themselves from the label “white” for obvious socio-political reasons.
LikeLike
well in italy kinda hard to say because italians from the iron age onward cremated their dead, so samples may be biased in favor of mixed-race people and non-locals but seems to be as follows:
– during bronze age only sicilians had minor near eastern (iran/caucasus) ancestry
– iron age italians had minor ancestry from north africa (mostly <1% rarely up to 10%)
– iron age italy had a few near eastern outliers, likely traders
– near eastern admixture in iron age non-outliers was low (0-2%)
– a moderate influx of near eastern ancestry came into rome during late antiquity, mostly from anatolia
– near eastern ancestry increased massively during imperial rome when central italy became cosmopolitan and attracted people from all over the empire
in greece, they have always had additional ancestry from the caucasus dating back to iirc the copper age but not really sure of the precise dates of genetic changes in greece. greek islanders have a lot of ancestry from near eastern anatolians
LikeLike
The problem is that you didn’t specificaly answer how a population With predominant Autosomal dna that is supposedly most similar to the ones found Middle Eastern populations gave rise to European looking phenotypes. If southeastern Europeans and North Caucasians descend from some of the same ancestral populations and share the same genes and also look alike phenotypically, then logically they must have Similar amounts of admixture from their shared ancestral groups.
LikeLike
do you know how genes work? because if you don’t then this whole discussion is pointless
LikeLike
I’m no expert on genetics but I do know that the predominant genes (base pairs of dna found in autosomal chromosomes) determine your phenotype. A base pair consists of two nucleotides which are essentialy chemical compounds.
LikeLike
Just curious, why don’t you consider Castizos White? Nick is a Castizo and you seem to accept him as White, so why not Castizos in general?
LikeLike
no castizos aren’t white, including nick. some castizos LOOK white but that’s not the same thing as being white. most castizos just look like average swarthy south americans.
another example: some iranian pamiris from tajikistan look white, but biologically they’re half middle eastern.
or another example, ashkenazi jews, half middle eastern but often look white except for a few very obvious facial features
and yet another example: people from the north caucasus. again, half near eastern, they genetically cluster with other middle easterners like iranians and turks, but often look northern european tier white
LikeLike
Hi, Thule, do you consider Finns and Samis white or mixed? They have asian admixture up to 25% if I’m not mistaken. And Magyars, Russians and Bulgarians also.
LikeLike
finns maximum 5% east asian DNA, not mixed. saamis definitely mixed, 20% on average
magyars have undetectably small amounts of DNA, same with bulgarians, and only some russians have east asian DNA, mostly the Finnic people in the far north and the Russias who colonized Siberia
so, only Saami I would class as mixed
LikeLike
It’s something I’ve wondered about for some time but how do you imagine ancient Indian civilization functioned and came to be? After the initial Andronovo venture into the subcontinent and the Vedic civilization was solidly established, what happened next? Were southern Indians/Dravidians really capable of maintaining/contributing to one of the worlds first civilizations? They are related to Australian Aboriginals aren’t they? Why didn’t any other Australo-Melanesian people do anything of note if so? Did the Indo-Aryans have rules to the caste system about not being ruled over by them like they forbade mixing with them? Did it consist of Aryans handling statecraft and such while Dravidians were soldiers/farmers/whatever? This entire field of study is so incredibly schizophrenic because it’s such a sore spot for Indians and leftists alike that it’s pretty much impossible to find anything on what the social dynamics of ancient India or the role Indo-Aryans played it in was like, I wonder if the record will ever be set straight at some point.
LikeLike
The Indus Valley Civilizaiton was actually founded by Middle Eastern farmers from Iran who migrated eastward into India during the Neolithic. They brought the Dravidian languages and mixed to varying degrees with the native, dark-skinned South Asian Hunter-Gatherers. I think their ancestry was 75% Middle Eastern 25% native Indian, on average.
Today, the Dravidian languages are spoken by the dark-skinned populations of South India who descend mostly or entirely from the native Indians. The Aryan languages are spoken by the other populations, who are a mix of invading Indo-Europeans and the predominantly Iranian farmers of the IVC, with varying degrees of native Indian ancestry.
The invading Indo-Aryans did have a vague caste system before they invaded, but they invented new strict castes because they didn’t want to mix with the native dark-skinned Indians. They were particularly racist against them and called them “dasyu” which variously translates to demon, barbarian, slave, servant, enemy. The Manusmriti has a bunch of laws against race mixing and the Indo-Aryan term for caste, varna, literally means “color.” They probably did mix with the Iranian-types of the Indus Valley Civilization though.
LikeLike
What do you think about this?
https://archive.ph/https://scroll.in/article/936872/two-new-genetic-studies-upheld-aryan-migration-theory-so-why-did-indian-media-report-the-opposite
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.62023/page/n251/mode/2up?view=theater&q=mediterranean%23
LikeLike
too long, didn’t read. sorry. ask a more specific question and I will give you a specific answer
LikeLike
and these:
LikeLike
Sumerian blue eyed kings is a strange phenomenon but blue eyes were present in small numbers in neighboring regions, as far as I know we don’t have any genetic data on Sumerians but they were almost definitely just regular Middle Easterners
LikeLike
Hello Thuletide, I have a comment to make in regards to your telegram. The video that you recently shared about that modular body is actually from a scifi movie called “The Modular Body” (https://www.themodularbody.com/). So while our elites are freaky transhumanists, they haven’t gotten to that point yet.
LikeLike
Oh, excellent, thanks, I will delete it
usually a check things first but i forgot to this time
LikeLike
Man I miss 2019 because that was when I did a huge deep dive into a lot of conspiracies like Flat Earth, Christchurch being fake, Chemtrails, Hurricanes, HAARP, Epstein-Rothschild Nexus, Seattle 11/03, etc. I was already JQ pilled but I’m a life-long conspiracy theorist, much like yourself.
Anyway I thought I might share some useful information on how the American Government intends to liquidize any organized opposition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcyK0OhcsC4
LikeLike
What are your thoughts on this ‘Tianyuan man’ meme leftists and brown people seem to be peddling? More of the usual narrative these people push but more honest, thought you might want to give some insight.
LikeLike
so much text and half truth in that meme it can only have been created by a mentally ill pajeet with a revenge rape fantasy
False:
– ANE can be genetically modeled using modern population sources like in Eurogenes K13 or Harappaworld (this will just show nonsense results)
– the pre-ANE West Eurasian lineage was white and blond (no human was white when ANE & East Asians mixed over 35,000 years ago)
– Yamnaya were black/swarthy
– Early European Farmers were pale and all blond
True:
– ANE had 10-30% East Asian ancestry, depending on the ANE population in question
– ANE haplogroups R and Q are likely to have originated with an early East Asian population e.g. Tianyuan Man
– Both EEF and Yamnaya had less blond hair and blue eyes than modern Europeans
– Both EEF and Yamnaya had slightly darker pigmentation than modern northern Europeans, it was probably more similar to average South European
– Globular Amphora EEF (who the Yamnaya-related IE mixed with) had more blondism than the early Indo-Europeans
LikeLike
What do you think of Andrew Tate?
LikeLike
ben shapiro for black incels
LikeLike
What race are Pashtuns and Tajiks? Are they Middle Eastern?
LikeLike
Middle Eastern. They mostly descend from native farmers of Iran from the BMAC culture (who didn’t speak Indo-Iranian languages). They have some ancestry from Northern European Sintashta (who did speak Indo-Iranian languages) and from East Asia and India.
The Pamiri Tajiks (yagnob, shugnan, rushan) have more European ancestry. So, often they just look like Europeans, even though they are half Middle Eastern. Similar in this way to Ashkenazi Jews. Video of a Pamiri girl who just looks French or something:
LikeLike
Why was the narrative of WHG being black skinned pushed so hard when most of Europe has very little ancestry from them? The most I’ve seen in any group is 15%.
LikeLike
WHG somehow got a reputation as the “first europeans” even though they weren’t so libtards just ran with the narrative that they were Black to justify contemporary immigration by saying “see, non-Whites were here first!”
LikeLike
Thuletide,
This is a very good description of the controlled opposition we face in this time. Credit to Vanillamaster.
https://imgur.com/a/I50u6ju
LikeLike
looks like retarded gibberish to me. it’s unreadable and badly presented
LikeLike
Ah maybe it’s too small. It’s based on a documentary by Titus Frost about the swamp within the “opposition”: https://invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=kXjKNNfmGA8
IDK how to upload images on wordpress, sorry m8.
Vanillamaster’s Telegram: @Vanillamaster88
LikeLike
At what point does a mixed race population become its own distinct race?
LikeLike
complicated question so probably easiest if I give you the long answer and explain everything:
as things stand today there are around 6 populations that you can describe as definitively distinct human races or subspecies, and all other human populations are mixtures between these groups.
1. west eurasian / caucasoid
2. east eurasian
3. amerindian
4. australo-melanesian / oceanian
5. sub-saharan african
6. south african / khoisan
each of these races has at least *some* minor ancestry from neighboring major races but they are clearly genetically and phenotypically distinct from all other races.
technically you could describe any mixed-race population as its own unique race if you use the term “race” to mean “biological group,” which is how it was used in the past and is sometimes used today.
if we use the term “race” to mean “subspecies,” which is how most people use it today, then a mixed population would become its own distinct race when it is genetically and physically diverged enough from other races, and when it has existed in isolation for enough generations to become genetically and phenotypically homogeneous.
so, hispanics (mestizos, castizos, pardos) are not a distinct race because they have very large phenotypic and genetic variation. same with south asians / indians. these are mixed-race populations or “clines,” as they are sometimes called (though I dont think the term should be used this way). central asians or altaic people are also a mixed-race population, as they exist on a genetic and phenotypic gradient from almost 100% european (some tatars) to almost 100% east asian (mongolians).
native americans are a good example of a formerly mixed-race population that became a distinct race/subspecies. they were a mix of caucasoid ancient north eurasians and early east asians, but were isolated for many thousands of years and became very genetically and phenotypically distinctfrom east asians and caucasoids.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the detailed reply, much appreciated 👍
LikeLike
What are your thoughts on the Middle Ages? Specifically, the claim that Europe was a decrepit, backwards and hellish backwater during it while the Middle East, China, etc. flourished and left it behind that’s so often pushed by mainstream ‘historians’. Muslim Spain is probably the biggest example of it as it’s almost always referenced when the ‘Islamic Golden Age’ is brought up to try to contrast how tolerant and advanced it was compared to Christian unwashed barbarian Europe. Alternatively, how did these same people go from supposedly being the center of the world to being left behind and surpassed by Whites in everything?
LikeLike
100% true that the middle ages sucked compared to classical antiquity, especially the early middle ages, but it wasn’t hellish or backwater.
the so-called “islamic” golden age was just a bunch of arabs conquering iran and then stealing all of their philosophy and science. ive never heard anyone claim that islamic occupied hispania was a golden age but that might just be coincidence due to who ive communicated with
actually, the jews often claim that it was their golden age but I havent heard it from libtards, for example
LikeLike
I saw your anime recommendations list, what do you think of Dragon Ball Z?
LikeLike
never watched it but I like the memes. i dont really like old animes
LikeLike
[Off-topic]
I wanted to introduce you to Finnish television channel idents/ bumpers/background music. I think you’ll like them. Foreign tv usually comes off as loud, sterile, in-your-face etc. but Finnish tv is calming. These are something else.
(Recordings of them can be found on YT:)
[Yle TV1 Logo History 1958-present uploaded by ”JontyMaster”]
The tv idents/logos from 1970-1986, 1992-1998 and 2007~2012 are the best ones.
The next one is non-English:
[MTV3 1957-2015
uploaded by ”Nostalgia-TV”,
the one which is 15 min long and has 24k views]
The ones from 1980s, 2005-2013 are my favorites.
Until the mid-80s, all Finnish national airwaves (radio&tv) were under state control, then de-regulation of markets happened.
Ireland and Finland were the last European countries in 1998 where the physical telecommunications infrastructure was operated and maintained by the state and not by a private actor. Now, Finnish television infrastructure is owned by an investment giant ”DigitalBridge Group, Inc.”.
LikeLike
Hi. I fully support your work, follow you sporadically on Telegram, and applaud the downloadable resources you make available on this site. That’s a lot of hard work well done. I have one critical observation to make. You seem to see yourself as ‘right-wing’, certainly using this term frequently as a framing metaphor in many posts. I suggest you consider dumping it, for various reasons. First, the term is a verbal weapon used by leftists to demonise their critics for many decades, with great success. It’s now a tainted, outdated label which millions of normies shun automatically, so neither attractive nor effective. Don’t help the left by using it. Second, ‘right-wing’ and ‘left-wing’ act as linguistic tools to prevent clear thinking and to hide the historical reality of political struggle. How so? The left-right axis makes us think horizontally rather than vertically. Make the axis vertical, and you immediately see that the tiny top or ruling elite always tries to control and exploit the massive bottom or plebs. Political control works top-down primarily, and only rarely bottom-up. ‘Parasite elite vs producer class’ also describes human political history well, albeit too negatively. But thinking ‘left-right’ does not describe reality at all. Instead, it hides it, even or especially from deluded leftists. You might call such thinking a mental control system, a device to divide and rule the plebs via their very mindset. So, thirdly, what to use instead of ‘right-wing’? I suggest the grammatically and logically-correct term ‘non-leftist’. This describes most people, suggests no ideology, and doesn’t exclude a diverse range of opinion. Non-leftists are the silent majority now horrified by leftism but too afraid of ‘the right’ to embrace it. I actually like to call myself ‘anti-leftist’. This is correct logically and also personally: I claim that leftist ideology is what most drives anti-white, anti-western, anti-Christian bigotry. Leftist ideology or mind control is the hidden supremacism, the evil bent on replacing our way of life with the insane, barbaric, totalitarian hell of ‘1984’. OK, I hope you find such thinking useful and keep up the good fight. Thanks for the attention!
LikeLike
right-wing and left-wing represent coherent, distinct worldviews believed by people with different biological and psychological characteristics. “right-wing” is demonized because the left are in power. when we are in power, “left-wing” will be demonized. plus it’s only demonized to weirdo leftists.
right vs left = order vs chaos, hierarchy vs equality, tradition vs “progress,” normal vs outcast. there is no better way to describe these distinctions than left vs right
LikeLike
Are men or women more right- or left brained? Are men or women better at math, statistically speaking?
LikeLike
no idea, never looked it up
LikeLike
1. What are the ancestral compositions of Anatolian Neolithic Farmers, Caucasus Hunter Gatherers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers and Levant Natufians?
2. Are Cypriot Greeks White/European or Middle Eastern?
LikeLike
1. still being debated but afaik it went something like:
a) all middle east originally populated by a general “west eurasian” population similar to ancient europeans
b) some time during the paleolithic, a “basal eurasian” ancestry expands from the arabian peninsula and mixes with this general west eurasian population resulting in a general “middle eastern” ancestry that is sometimes called “dzudzuana.” basal eurasian ancestry exists in varying amounts thought the middle east
c) european hunter-gatherers migrate into anatolia, mix with dzudzuana to create anatolia/caucasus population
d) ancient north eurasians migrate into middle east and mix with iranian and caucasian populations, distinguishing them from anatolians
e) natufians may have had some ancestry from iberomaurusians, paleolithic north africans, distinguishing them from the other populations
2. I dont know if they would like to be called middle eastern, but they are. cyprus is next door to the levant and turkey
LikeLike
White women more aggressive than Asian women, agree?
Also, just curious but why did you delete your ethnographic world map article?(https://archive.ph/ApfsH)
LikeLike
havent seen any data but asian women are more neotenous and neoteny correlates with a lack of aggression, so maybe
making a new and better ethnographic world map
LikeLike
Ehi thuletide what’s your opinion on that dude on tiwtter who is a nordicist but also brags about being 1/6 mongolian that brags about being blonde and blu eyed and who claims that anglos,germans and french ain’t White cause most of them has brown hair and eyes?
I remember that in the past you both used to retweet and like each others.
BTW I forgot his name sorry but I think you know who I mean
LikeLike
I also forgot his name. most of it is shitposting but afaik he does genuinely think that South Europeans are not White and obviously I do not agree with that sort of Nordicism.
LikeLike
Are all European phenotypes in non-Whites (blonde hair, red hair, colored eyes, etc.) the result of White admixture? The Melanesians in particular have blonde hair, but I’ve seen it claimed that it’s the result of an entirely different set of genes from European ones. There’s also some Berbers and Asians but it seems pretty obvious that’s the result of European contact.
LikeLike
yes, melanesian blondism is unrelated to whites. stereotypically “white” phenotype genes were present in various ancient populations that contributed to both europeans and middle easterners: early european farmers from anatolia, caucasus hunter-gatherers, ancient north eurasians. so it’s possible for people with no direct modern european ancestry to have “european” phenotypes, but rare because these phenotypes only became common in europe
LikeLike
Hello thuletide,
I really like your blog and I would like to ask if you could help me out with European sub-races classified by Hans Gunther. According to him, there are:
Nordids
East-Baltids
Mediterreanids
Alpinids
Dinarids
Dalofaelids
Is it possible that you can say which race belong to which kind of groups listed on this image:
Nordids are high likely Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer and Funnelbeaker, but I don’t know about the other groups.
LikeLike
The Hans Gunther things are phenotype classifications, they don’t really correspond to specific ancient populations. Ancestry from ancient populations does influence these phenotypes, but everyone in Europe descends from the same few ancient populations:
– Early European Farmers
– Western Hunter-Gatherers
– Proto-Indo-Europeans or Western Steppe Herders (Eastern Hunter-Gatherers + Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers), sometimes labeled “Yamnaya” for convenience
The only difference is the proportions of ancestry:
LikeLike
I understand. According to the statistic you posted, the Nordic countries have more Yamnaya ancestry, while the Dinaric countries have more Early Neolithic ancestry. From what I learned, Nordids have the Haplogroup I1, while Dinarids have Haplogroup I2 and both, Nordids and Dinarids have long heads.
LikeLike
haplogroups have nothing to do with peoples apperance, they are a very very small part of DNA that doesnt change over thousands of years
LikeLike
What do you think should be done about the various dissenting European ethnic groups that don’t want to be assimilated into the greater nation? The Irish with Britain, the Basque with Spain, Ukrainians with Russia, all of the Balkans (kinda), etc. Should they just be granted autonomy?
There’s really no skirting around the fact that separatist movements deprive a nation of manpower, resources, etc., but is it better than potentially starting a conflict?
LikeLike
If they inhabit independent countries (e.g. Irish, Ukrainians) then nothing because they are not separatists. If they are minuscule groups that are just causing trouble in a country where they have the same rights as all other citizens, like the Spanish Catalan separatists, then I would gulag their leaders until they learned to behave.
LikeLike
Is there any sort of mass library/ archive that you’re aware of that keeps not only things like the things you post, but also accurate records of history, and preservation of culture?
LikeLike
no but there should be
LikeLike
Do you think non-Whites (excluding East Asians) are capable of creating advanced civilizations?
LikeLike
well, they created civilizations before we did but that depends on what you mean by “advanced”
LikeLike
Hi Thule, I see people from the Caucasus in pro-White/pro-European circles saying that Caucasians (especially North Caucasians) are white, what do you think? Some of them do look white, but many look like half MEasterners (in google images).
LikeLike
Nah, White = strictly European. They are Caucasian, different thing. They have never classed themselves as Europeans and genetically they are not European.
LikeLike
Thanks for responding. Same with Turks and Jews and maybe some mixed Meds in the very South.
LikeLike
Their IQs regress to European ones by and large as far south as Armenia. Will consider them white myself.
LikeLike
east asians have similar IQ to whites, are they white too?
LikeLike
“I am not a European man, but an Asian, a Russified Georgian.”- Stalin the Georgian to a Japanese journalist.
LikeLike
Dumb question: why did Evola deem Slalom Skiing as degenerate?
The Italian Futurist Art Movement probably had been deemed as ”Degenerate Art” by the Germans.
I don’t think the first generation of Impressionist painters like Monet were that bad. Iirc when Wilhelm II first saw paintings by Vincent Van Gough he wanted them banned from the gallery.
What do you think of Spain passing ”Only (saying) Yes means Yes” sexual consent law?
LikeLike
I can’t remember why he said it was degenerate. Probably something to do with going down hills instead of climbing up them being feminine or lazy or whatever.
IDK anything about the law
LikeLike
Is the “out of Africa” hypothesis sturdy or is it debunk-able? I’m genuinely sick of seeing Afrocentrists use it to claim all of European history and calling us genetic mutations even though every phenotype is a mutation. Were the homo-sapiens who allegedly migrated out of Africa literally modern day sub Saharans or were they more like archaic humans/monkey looking? Might you ever right an article going over the Out of Africa hypothesis and all of the evidence for it against it?
LikeLike
well, I guess it could be debunked somehow but I’m not sure how. the closest thing to a debunking is the theory that eurasians and oceanians or australo-melanesians descend from two separate out of africa migrations tens of thousands of years apart, which has genetic and archaeological backing: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2022/07/19/human-dispersal-out-of-africa-multiple-dispersal-hypothesis-study/
the humans who theoretically exited africa were not modern sub-saharan africans. they had already diverged from sub-saharan africans, who also experienced additional evolution since the divergence. a variety of human phenotypes likely existed within africa before the expansions.
oceanians and sub-saharans share the same MFSD12 black skin genes that they apparently inherited from the same ancestor. so, this indicates that there was, at the bare minimum, “black” population and a “non-black” population, since these genes have never been found in any eurasian population.
south african khoisan split from other homo sapiens long before out of africa, potentially hundreds of thousands of years, so that’s another distinct population that existed around the OoA timeperiod.
really, the idea that we all descend from blacks is just cheap fetishistic propaganda peddled by anti-white globalists and libtards.
LikeLike
Do you think the Palestine/Israel conflict narrative is of any use to us in the mainstream? Most Palestinians seem to be pretty anti-White, they often regard Jews as White Europeans themselves and think that Israel is illegitimate because it was founded by European colonists in the first place, I think the most we stand to benefit from it is that it’s something that potentially facilitates the loss of our enemies home base at no expense of our own, but both sides are pretty openly hostile and of little benefit to us.
LikeLike
I don’t see the point in picking sides between two anti-White Middle Eastern tribes fighting over a desert. and, as you say, people literally only dislike Israel because they think it’s a White colonialist state oppressing brown people, partially because Jews keep pretending to be European.
Its only usefulness is in pointing out Jewish hypocrisy regarding demographics since 95% of Western Jews support Israel, but their policies of race-based citizenship and DNA testing to make sure people qualify are good, so gottabe careful not to demonize the state’s positive aspects as “immoral.” people on the dissident right just seem to hate Israel because it’s le heckin evil Jews oppressing brown people – “just like they’re oppressing us, man! one struggle!”
LikeLike
1. What was the difference between Basal Eurasians and West Eurasians?
2. Were Anatolian Neolithic Farmers 50% dzuduzuana and 50% WGH
3. Did the ancestors of Caucasus Hunter Gatherers and Iranian Neolithic Farmers intermix with Western Hunter Gatherers before intermixing with Ancient North Eurasians?
4. Were the Iberomaurusians and Paleolithic North Africans Caucasoid?
LikeLike
1. basal eurasians are a theoretical population that may have split from other eurasians before the east asian / west eurasian divergence. but they seem to have had a caucasoid phenotype, given that people like saudis with very high basal eurasian ancestry are clearly caucasoid. I think that’s a plot hole in the theory
2. idk because nobody has published the dzudzuana samples yet so I cant check and experiment with models but no probably not
3. as far as I know they were isolated in the middle east and WHG were isolated in europe
4. they were 60% caucasoid 40% sub saharan african
LikeLiked by 1 person
What’s your take on women who don’t display hyper-feminine qualities or women who are less womanly/ladylike such as tomboys and women with Tsundere qualities (bcs Tsundere personality sometimes overlaps w/ tomboy qualities)? Whether resulting from an extra dose of testosterone in the womb or as a learned behavior during childhood?
Nowadays women can get away with wearing pants, it wouldn’t be considered crossdressing.
And there probably are some high IQ women like doctors (not forced workplace quota hires) imo the state ought to support intelligent newlyweds so the bride can realize her womanly lifestyle as a home mom. If she’s a doctor, she’ll probably forget the Latin names of all the 206 human bones, but to the newborn his/her mom is his/her whole world at least for the first year or so. An intelligent woman’s extended family would help with raising the older children so it takes commitment to balance family life and (respectable) university studies in the case of oulier high IQ women.
The organic individual relations inbetween the nuclear & extended(!) families have been largely outsourced to the welfare state, a faceless bureaucracy to which one has a mere ”customer/client” relationship with.
This young generation is averse to responisibility, duty, commitment etc. ”mental illness” is used as an escape from commitment.
Nationalists hold Japan in a high regard and one of the problems in Japanese society is absent (overworking) fathers.
Even a daily commute of 130 minutes, is time spent away from family and self-improvement. Parents (in the West) will go into great lengths into suffering for their sons and daughters, this can mean commuting 30 miles or more to the city for work.
LikeLike
can you condense your question into one sentence?
LikeLike
Black Americans are ~20% White on average, but White Americans barely have any Black admixture. How come?
LikeLike
whites have a bigger population plus mixed people were classed as black and banned from mixing with whites
LikeLike
Which race are Siberians?
From what I gather they seem to be mostly East Asian with Caucasoid admixture. Is this correct?
LikeLike
they range from having basically zero caucasoid admixture among people like the ulchi in the east to having 80% or more caucasoid admixture like udmurts and saami in the west. from the borders of european russia to central china is basically a big west-to-east eurasian genetic gradient
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ehi thuletide what is your opinions on these 2 Italians named “Dario Moccia” and “RichardHTT”? they are both Italians and they are from the centre-north Italy and they are White but look kinda brown.
LikeLike
obvious MENA admixture, definitely mixed race ancestry at some point in their genetic lineage
LikeLike
This reminded me of an interesting thing I saw lately, that basically Alessandro de’ Medici Duke of Florence wasn’t actually half black but he just had dark features that were later exagerated after his death by political rivals, some example of original paintings of him:
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.f9NhMiXUdrlewaYgurW7qQHaHa?pid=ImgDet&rs=1
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP._Sgicv30gurDKoLFiUT1agAAAA?pid=ImgDet&rs=1
https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.07a44dbf8489e2976dbaac3559ad7f97?rik=U9L4tapRrDEG6A&riu=http%3a%2f%2fwww.artnet.com%2fWebServices%2fimages%2fll00373lldRVaFFgVeECfDrCWvaHBOctZF%2fbronzino-portrait-of-alessandro-de-medici-wearing-a-black-cloak-over-a-suit-of-chain-mail.jpg&ehk=VO8F9ELoUOOzG0b5chbMSF33OaCoX56vhcspOLE%2fLmA%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.HozCVDHEXRY9jfm44U-O6wHaKW?pid=ImgDet&rs=1
What do you think about this? Was he really half-black or another dario moccia?
LikeLike
First painting looks White, others look like he has non-White ancestry
LikeLike
what do you think of pan-europeanism?
LikeLike
in what sense? like a European superstate? not feasible at all. it doesn’t even really make sense in European colonies where people get assimilated into a “White” identity because you inevitably get European ethnicities, like Balkan Slavs or the Irish, bringing their stupid petty squabbles and crying about being oppressed by Anglos and stuff.
if you mean just European states co-operating then there’s nothing wrong with it. Europe could be an autarkic continent.
LikeLike
Hi,
What do you think about categorization of personality types? What I mean by this includes models like Myers-Briggs, Big Five etc. Is there any reliability to theories like these? Could different personality archetypes correlate with physiognomy of individuals? Are there notable inconsistencies between such categorization and racial realism?
And furthermore:
Is it possible that there is polarization by personality archetypes between different sub-cultural factions due to circumstances in modern age or due to some other factors? For example, it would seem to me that present-day nationalist groups attract people with certain personality traits more than others. What do you think? Does the general atmosphere of nationalism offer enough for the personality types that were present in traditional white societies? Thank you in advance.
LikeLike
The models are very useful for categorizing broad trends. There is a big conflict between personality types today but that’s only because personality types are one aspect of an individual’s overall biological type (or phenotype). The real conflict is between different biological types. Yes, personality correlates with appearance, that is the core theory of physiognomy.
LikeLike
What are your thoughts on the theory that White countries have low crime rates (minus non-White presence) because Europe executed its criminals and removed overly violent elements from its gene pool? Given your posts on generational mutants, should we really be rehabilitating criminals/mentally insane and letting them back into society or was the death penalty better?
LikeLike
Definitely an accurate theory. I think most criminals should be executed or deported or permanently exiled to a labor gulag and the insane should be kept in asylums. Now we have career criminals and crazy homeless people everywhere.
LikeLike
Was reading a sino-platonic paper on Scythian/Iranic impact on Japan. They referenced a few lines from medieval Japanese texts that were bizarre. The Nihon Kouki, describes Saka-no-ue no Tamuramaro, the first shogun of Japan, as having “a red countenance and a yellow beard” and another official, Yamato Yakamaro, as a “barbarian with a ruggedly honest character.” They cite this and other findings as a direct connection to Indo-Europeans rather than an indirect cultural spread from Koreans with IE contact. What are your thoughts on this idea? Is it possible the early shogun were mixed race?
The Paper: http://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp209_japan_inner_asia.pdf
LikeLike
Sogdians were the most influential non-Chinese people in the Tang dynasty, with high-ranking positions in military and government. That dates to around the same time period as the first Shogunate, so it’s theoretically possible that some Indo-Europeans were in Japan and directly influenced the Japanese system.
LikeLike
Consider visiting DebateAltRight on Saidit (Reddit knock-off). There are a couple of people that would like to hash out some issues with you.
LikeLike
too much effort to argue with random people on a dime store reddit website. they can post a comment here or DM me on gab if they want
LikeLike
How much Mongoloid/East Asian admixture do Anatolian turks have?
LikeLike
These are the results of averaged Turkish populations in a deep ancestry calculator I made for G25/Vahaduo. Looks around 8% on average. But the Turkic people they had ancestry from were probably like mixed-race Central Asians with a lot of West Eurasian (mostly Scythian) ancestry, so the amount of ancestry they have from that population is probably twice as much, up to 20%.
LikeLike
Why are Mestizos, South Asians, and Middle Easterners so similar looking phenotypically? Is this just how the default heterogeneous phenotype ends up looking like?
LikeLike
They aren’t similar. Mestizos look totally different. South Asians can look like anything from an average Iranian to a black-skinned Australian Aboriginal type tribal person.
LikeLike
Can you do that calculator thing for Hazaras? I’d like to know how much East Asian ancestry they have.
LikeLike
Around 40% on average judging by this model
LikeLike