My position on Israel has been consistent for years, so you may have heard it before. In one sentence: The problem with Israel is not that it is “mean to brown people” but that it actively undermines White nations. Our framing should always be: “What is good for Whites?”
Contents:
1. Article
2. Relevant quotes from the Hebrew Bible
3. Citations from Israeli/Jewish media outlets
1. Article
Western nationalists tread a fine line when criticizing Israel, as much anti-Israel sentiment stems from anti-White hatred. The prevailing, yet inaccurate, perception is that Israeli Jews are White supremacist settlers who maintain an imperial outpost on behalf of the evil, racist West. To the average Leftist worldwide, Whites and Israelis are indistinguishable colonizers, responsible for the brutal oppression of innocent brown natives. The US Campaign For Palestinian Rights, a coalition of over 300 organizations, claims that “the United States and Israel are settler colonial states built on the exclusionary ideology of white supremacy” and that “Zionism and the US empire, both manifestations of white supremacy, collaborate closely to achieve shared goals.”
99.9% of Palestine supporters totally ignore the fact that approximately half of Israelis are Mizrahi Jews native to the Middle East and that Ashkenazi Jews are a mixed-race population with ~50% Middle Eastern ancestry from ancient Israel (see 2020 and 2017 studies). They ignore the fact that Israel was founded via decolonial terrorist revolution against the British Empire and that the British severely restricted Jewish migration to Palestine, aiming to retain a Palestinian majority and a multiethnic state. They ignore the fact that many Jews moved to Israel to escape “racism” and that Jews of various races live alongside each other in Israel. You could raise these points but nobody would care. Ashkenazi Jews generally have fair skin, so all Israelis are “functionally White supremacist” colonizers.
As of 2023, Western conservatives began to link “Palestinian Liberation” to “Black Lives Matter,” identifying them as manifestations of the anti-White ‘decolonial’ revolution that began after the Second World War. These links are regularly touted by Leftists themselves, including the Palestinians. BLM memorials litter Palestine and Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar eulogized George Floyd: “Remember the racist murder of George Floyd. George Floyd was killed as a result of a racist ideology held by some people. The same type of racism that killed George Floyd is being used by [Israel] against the Palestinians.” Julius Malema of South Africa’s EFF party (the people who chant “Kill the Boer” at rallies) claimed that Hamas militants are “the same” as Nelson Mandela and other anti-White Communist revolutionaries in South Africa.
Ironically, Israelis use near-identical decolonial rhetoric to justify their nation-state: “The need for Zionism emerged out of racism against Jews, during the time that colonialism was disintegrating worldwide. […] Zionism is actually anti-colonialism. It is the removal of the British colonial powers and the return of the land to indigenous people, the Jewish people, in the same geographic location of the original Jewish civilization thousands of years ago.” (Times of Israel 2023)
Western nationalists who amplify Leftist, Third Worldist critiques of Israel — accusing Israel of being an “illegitimate” settler state, crying about colonialism, ethnic cleansing, etc. — are merely pouring fuel on the anti-White fire. They undermine our own nationalist claims and leave us vulnerable to Leftist subversion. This is particularly foolish when Leftists are openly stating that “no colonizer is innocent” and that violence against colonizers, including civilians, is justified (numerous Leftists cited Frantz Fanon during Hamas’ October 7 attack). Instead, we should take an unapologetic approach to colonialism: Whites cannot undo our colonialist past, nor should we want to. We should be immensely proud that we have founded civilizations on every habitable continent worldwide, and that our historic military domination of the Middle East and North Africa ended things like the Barbary Slave Trade, which enslaved millions of Whites for centuries.
Israel can be a useful example for Western nationalists to cite, as both an inspiration and a warning. Firstly, Israel has implemented many basic nationalist policies that White countries could and should emulate, from border walls to ethnicity-based citizenship. Western conservatives are extremely pro-Israel, so this is an easy sell. The same can be said of other countries’ nationalist policies; Nigeria banned foreigners in commercials, Estonia retroactively stripped citizenship for non-Estonians, and countless countries have mass deported foreigners (e.g. Tunisia, Pakistan, Nigeria). Secondly, Israel’s interethnic conflict demonstrates the inherent instability of multiracial societies, particularly those filled with violent religious fundamentalists, and the necessity of mass deportation. It is reasonable to point out that, unlike Israel, we have no desire to shoot children or establish a segregated multiracial state (a solution doomed to fail). Our goal is to secure ethnically homogeneous homelands for White people worldwide, which could, theoretically and ideally, be accomplished without the use of violence. Most migrants have been in the West for less than a decade; with a few policy changes, they could be sent home in half that time.
When criticizing Israel, our framing should always be: “What is good for Whites?” The primary issues with Israel are 1) that it essentially serves as a base of operations for international Jewish politics, which are often diametrically opposed to our own, and 2) that it relentlessly interferes with Western politics, often pressuring our governments into political self-harm.
The Israeli lobby dominating our foreign policy in the Middle East and North Africa for the last three decades is a good example of the latter (see the 1996 Clean Break Memo, covered in this article). Israeli mainstream media openly admits that “U.S Middle East policy is motivated by the pro-Israel lobby” and AIPAC, one of the biggest Israeli lobbies in America, released a video in 2019 claiming that they’ve “advanced the US-Israel relationship by lobbying every American leader no matter the political party for 60 years.” Wars in the Middle East and North Africa (against Israel’s geopolitical enemies) were incredibly expensive, both financially and in terms of White lives lost, and we gained nothing. The 2003 Iraq War cost $1.1 trillion alone. As Trump famously said: We spent $6 trillion in the Middle East and didn’t even keep the oil. “We’ve got nothing. We never even kept a small, even a tiny oil well. Not one little oil well.”
The vast majority of migrants in the West today are not refugees displaced by MENA conflicts, but the destabilization of these regions in combination with domestic treason had a notable impact on European demographics during the mid-2010s. To be clear: The primary cause of mass migration is open borders, not war. With secure borders, a country could wage war to its heart’s content. Moreover, we should not oppose war on pacifistic grounds; what happens to MENA populations is none of our concern, as long as they remain in the Middle East and North Africa.
While the Israeli lobby pressured Western governments into destabilizing the Middle East and North Africa, the “Refugee Crisis” was greatly exacerbated by Israeli NGOs shipping migrants directly into Europe. These NGOs often received direct support from the Israeli government. IsraAid, for example, was partnered with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (their activities were also endorsed by AIPAC in 2016). Once again, Israeli/Jewish media outlets proudly proclaim that they are leading the push to bring migrants into the West. However, when Whites object to this behavior (or merely draw attention to it), we are accused of being “anti-Semitic Neo-Nazi conspiracy theorists.” This phenomenon is often called the ‘celebration parallax:’ “It’s not happening but it’s good that it is, and you deserve it for being a bigot.”
Costly foreign wars and mass migration are two major grievances but there are countless others. Israel harbors criminal fugitives who are wanted in the West. Israeli spies steal our military and technological secrets and supply them to our geopolitical enemies. We pay Israel billions of dollars of tribute money every year and receive nothing in return. Harmful Left-Wing domestic policies are supported, advanced, and often spearheaded by diaspora Jews in the West, ~95% of whom have positive opinions on Israel and 100% of whom have the legal right to Israeli citizenship. Many Left-Wing Jewish organizations in the West viciously oppose nationalism for Whites while vehemently supporting Jewish nationalism in Israel; the ADL is a prime example. In 2023, the World Jewish Congress published a video claiming that Jews have “led the fight for gay rights, helped lead the fight for racial justice, and led the fight for women’s rights,” adding that “the Jewish principle of Tikkun Olam tells Jews that they have the power to change the world.”
White Westerners could have positive relations with Israel and with Jews, in general. I think most people, including myself, would prefer to get along. Discounting Leftists, nobody would care about Zionism if it was merely a nation-building project in the Middle East and if Jews (both the Israelis and diaspora) worked in White interests. But this is not the case. They actively work to destabilize White nations through mass migration and other Left-Wing social agendas, while being completely opposed to most, if not all, of these policies in Israel. This begs the question: Why do Jews actively pursue these anti-White policies? It can be boiled down to two major factors.
Firstly, Jews are a nomadic population of non-European origin and recognize themselves as foreigners: “Ashkenazi Jews are not ‘functionally White'” (Forward), “We’re Jews, we’re not White, we define ourselves” (Jewish Journal), “Ashkenazi Jews are not White” (Times of Israel), “Ashkenazi Jews are people of color” (Times of Israel). As previously mentioned, the Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews who inhabit the West are genetically half-European and half-Semitic (2020, 2017). However, they could have assimilated into the European population during the two millennia they have lived among us. They refused to do so. Instead, they isolated themselves from European society, established parallel communities, and often sided with non-European invaders against us. Jews were not forcibly ‘ghettoized’ in Europe until the mid-1500s during the Renaissance, and they describe Muslim-occupied Iberia as a Jewish Golden Age.
This self-segregating behavior can be partially explained by the second factor: Jews are extremely ethnocentric and have a strong, culturally ingrained ethnoreligious belief that they are “God’s chosen people,” destined to “enlighten the nations” and “repair the world” (‘Tikkun Olam’). You can find this religious information in the Tanakh or Hebrew Bible alone, without delving into the Talmud or esoteric texts, such as the Zohar. Judaism is an ethnically exclusive and, essentially, supremacist religion; although, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with that and many ethnic groups hold similar beliefs. Of course, these views are not held by all Jews but they are extremely prevalent and can be seen even among atheistic Jews, with Karl Marx being a prime example. Marxism can be viewed as an atheistic eschatological doctrine, whereby an elect chosen few is destined to enlighten humanity and guide us toward a micromanaged technocratic “utopia,” remolding the entire world into a Heaven on Earth. (Naturally, Marxism in practice is just the scum of the earth robbing and killing normal people).
2. Relevant quotes from the Hebrew Bible
Some important Biblical quotes that contextualize the Jewish worldview.
“I shall submit you as a light unto the nations, to be My salvation until the end of the earth […] And unto your light, nations shall walk, and kings unto the brightness of your rising”
Isaiah 42:6, Isaiah 60:3
“For the Lord your God will bless you as he has promised, and you will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. You will rule over many nations but none will rule over you.”
Deuteronomy 15:6
“Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest, whether on money or food or anything else that may earn interest. […] You may charge a foreigner interest, but not a fellow Israelite, so that the Lord your God may bless you in everything you put your hand to in the land you are entering to possess.”
Deuteronomy 23:19-20
“Foreigners will rebuild your walls, and their kings will serve you. […] Your gates will always stand open, they will never be shut, day or night, so that people may bring you the wealth of the nations— their kings led in triumphal procession.
Isaiah 60:10-11
“the Lord will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations larger and stronger than you. […] Every place where you set your foot will be yours […] No one will be able to stand against you. The Lord your God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, wherever you go.”
Deuteronomy 11:23-25
“In the last days the mountain of the Lord’s temple will be established as the highest of the mountains; it will be exalted above the hills, and all nations will stream to it. […] Many peoples will come and say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the temple of the God of Jacob. He will teach us his ways, so that we may walk in his paths.” The law will go out from Zion, the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. He will judge between the nations and will settle disputes for many peoples. They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore.”
Isaiah 2:1-4
A summary of Jewish beliefs regarding their ‘messianic age’:
3. Citations from Israeli/Jewish media outlets
Jews explain that Jews are not White:
Almost all diaspora Jews are pro-Israel and “agree with Israelis on almost everything”:
Jewish domination of American foreign policy:
Asylum seekers in Israel are deported to White countries:
Asylum centers in Europe during the “Refugee Crisis” were operated by Israelis (and probably still are):
American Jews harbor illegal migrants:
Approximately 60% of American Rabbis sign a document supporting migration:
Muslim migration into White countries is good because it is “revenge for the Holocaust” and “necessary to defeat White supremacy”:
Anti-immigration policies and bias in Israel:
Anti-African policies and bias in Israel:
Israel often harbors fugitive criminals who are wanted in the West. It has a particularly nasty problem with fugitive pedophiles:
.
It’s understandable why conservatives/right wingers support Israel because deep down it’s a symbol of what they all want for their countries even if they won’t publicly admit to it and brainwashing from the scofield Bible and the hollycaust. However the Jewish race is inherently antagonistic against the gentiles of the earth most especially European nations who they believe are the descendants of Amalek/Edom and that by pursuing the goal of tikkun olam they can fulfill their duty as a race to rule over and enslave all the gentiles of the earth. The question is though is how can those of the dissident right assume power without violence? This isn’t a promotion of terrorism but a realization that the political system will never allow an outsider to participate and if they do they get the Ron Paul treatment where the media will ignore them or they’ll be forced to compromise on their message by pandering to the Zionist/Globalist agenda and thus be another lackey for the state. The problem is we don’t have a platform to promote our views to the masses other than anonymously over social media and anytime we DO have an event when promoting it they’re leftists agitator groups, police, and federal informants on the inside that will do anything they can to stop it from happening this proving this is a uniparty system. Perhaps we should take inspiration from the Zionist movement itself most especially during the early days when Theodore Herzel with funding from wealthy Jewish elites promoted multiple Zionist conferences and founded multiple organizations for Zionist interests. We should encourage ourselves to become wealthy and find the right people to help lead our movement from out of the shadows and forced into the mainstream. We should also take notice though that Israel and the Jews are siding more and more with China and Russia everyday and ditching the west as it becomes mongrelized and that more Westerners are awakening to the Jewish question everyday especially in modern events like the Kanye West situation all over social media right now. I suggest to you thuletide to look into the project heavenly Jerusalem project. It’s basically a Jewish backup plan of ditching Israel and creating a new Zionist state in Ukraine that is one of the reasons why Russia is invading Ukraine right now because Israel is demographically doomed because their birthrates have fallen because of their own propaganda poisoning them and that the Hasidic Jews are refusing to serve in the military and live off of welfare services while having multiple kids.
LikeLiked by 2 people
An excellent article as always Thuletide, just one small correction- Israel does not require DNA tests to grant citizenship (although according to a search on the internet it was discussed at some point in the Israeli parliament), rather potential immigrants need rabbinic approval. This actually allows those who are of a completely non-Jewish *ethnic* origin to immigrate there, provided they have officially converted to Judaism (the *religion*). Also allows those who had a grandparent that was “considered Jewish” (regardless of what their total ethnic makeup may have been) to immigrate there. Hope that clarifies that matter.
All the best.
NB and of course, the fact that they don’t do it doesn’t mean it’s not necessarily a good idea for our own countries.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ah yes, my mistake, will edit later. I see now the article I read is actually about DNA tests for to prove Jewishness to the Rabbinate to be allowed to marrry.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello, a good article, Thank you.
I urge you to take an interest in this israeli religious/political movement that is Kahanism.
The owner of this youtube channel is an Israeli anti-racist and he details well what is happening in Israel and you will simply hallucinate.
Israel is the only country in the “western world” that has a real extreme right wing, we are a joke.
LikeLike
Great info, Thuletide. As a Christian, I’m in the process of removing the “Judeo” aspect of my faith, and found your Biblical quotes enlightening. They had a rather Talmudic flavor.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t hate Christianity (well I do hate “Judeo-Christianity”), but after reading some of those verses I just can’t understand how White Europeans can be or continue to be Christian. I don’t want to think this like this btw. And considering how Jews view Whites from a biblical standpoint—how they believe we are “Amalek”/“Edom” or whatever, and that we must be utterly rooted out of existence according to their “holy” and esoteric scriptures, and they’ve believed these things for over 2000 years. There are tons of clips of Rabbis and Jews in general saying this stuff. Adam Green—even though I don’t like him—is a good source on those things. I don’t know, it’s just insane to think that this small, lame, bland, cultural/race of people have completely dominated us for over 100 years and are now quite literally trying to genocide us and Brazilify our nations. Like what were our White Ancestors thinking when they read the Bible?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, the New Testament overwrites all of the “Jews are God’s chosen people” stuff by claiming that the followers of Christ are the new chosen people and the new Israel and that anyone, Jew or non-Jew, is welcome to follow the teachings of Christ (or the teachings of the early Christians who wrote the Bible, at least).
LikeLiked by 1 person
also calling the jews that rejected christ the synagogue of satan. I do think it’s a bit misleading you taking those quotes by themselves though, because it’s not just “the new testament”, the old testament clearly states that the covenant with God meant if they rejected him, as they do, they will also be punished. Things like how they will be dispersed across the nations and other curses. That’s all in the old testament.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How is it misleading? What are you even trying to say here?
“The Jews rejected Christ therefore the Old Testament (written 900-300 BC and the foundation of all other Jewish holy texts) is not a true and genuine reflection of their beliefs” ???
Totally nonsensical and nonsequitur.
LikeLike
I guess I worded it poorly. I dont mean it’s misleading for their beliefs in the artcile, I mean misleading in regards to the comments. How the guy was saying how Europeans cant be Christian because of those verses and stuff.
LikeLike
I know this post is well over a year old (so I’m not sure if you’ll even get this), but:
– Most of the Deuteronomy quotes are about the Canaanite conquest specifically.
– Isaiah 60:10-11 is about Israel’s return from exile.
– Isaiah 2:1-4 doesn’t mention Israelite supremacy.
– Lastly (and most importantly), Judaism is selective in its reading of the Hebrew Bible. For example, go read Deuteronomy chapter 9, which details how while Israel was technically “chosen,” it wasn’t for the sake of Israel’s ethnic supremacy.
As for the rabbis who boast about the esoteric stuff, most of said esotericism is a later development. There’s no way the Pentateuch’s authors had the Roman Empire in mind when they were describing Esau/Edom.
LikeLike
At this stage, I am not sure what the solution is….but we need to collectivize or we will perish…Kevin Macdonald has noted that Jews have used intellectual movements and discarded them when the intellectual movements no longer served their interests – i.e. the switch from Trotkyism to Neoconservatism because left wing movements became anti-war and pro Palestinian. There is the possibility that they will turn on multiculturalism as the blowback from open borders of Middle Eastern/North African immigrants have turned on them in Europe (https://twitter.com/BelgianFOI/status/1586366588827336704). With regard to trying to get along with Zionists, the hostility it seems is all from their side, so I am not sure they can be reasoned with. It seems that we can never satisfy them – i.e. if they have 10 demands, we meet 9 to the letter, they still aren’t happy. Maybe a white/Islam alliance against Zionism could be a strategy?
LikeLike
Agree with your post except for this line: “Maybe a white/Islam alliance against Zionism could be a strategy?”
Terrible idea. Muslims are colonizing our countries. They openly gloat about conquering the West without having to fire a single bullet (though this is technically not true) and have continually tried to invade Europe for 1000+ years. They are not and will never be our allies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[Removed textwall of Islam apologetics]
LikeLike
Go cry somewhere else. Banned.
LikeLike
Latest poll of french Muslim show that 75% under 25 put sharia law above law of the République, consider that a lower percentage apply to the subsaharian muslims you get an idea of north African French youth
LikeLike
Are you using “Muslim” as a proxy for MENAs? If so, what about atheistic / non-Islamic MENAs? Are they just as anti-white?
LikeLike
No, that person specifically asked about an alliance with Muslims. But ask any non-Islamic/atheist MENA immigrant in the West if they think the West should be 100% White and you’ll see them go mask off anti-White pretty quickly.
LikeLike
To understand how intractably anti-White Muslims are, consider this: There is only one group in The West that has always taken Iran’s side for the past 20 years, and that group is pro-Whites. Iran’s government, constantly threatened by jews, attacked and denounced on and off by every single other group on Europe and America other than us, makes a grand pronouncement in 2020 or so that the biggest problem in the world is “White Supremacy,” putting them on the side of the jews who talk every day about killing them, and against the only people who have not talked about killing them this century.
Muslims always side with jews over Whites (see also: every Palestinian in America). It’s been that way for 1400 years and it will never change.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Iran’s government ≠ Iranians.
IIRC most Iranians absolutely despise their government. Religiosity also appears to be declining in Iran
LikeLike
Oh boy, speaking of Muslims always siding with jews against Whites, check out this tweet. Also note that he only lists Whites in this list of illegitimate occupiers, with one exception: the race that some Whites once famously distinguished as “honorary [Whites]”:
LikeLike
I think that Israel is a very misunderstood topic among the right. Supporting Israel does not make someone a “Jewish Puppet”. These journalists do not necessarily represent Israelis at large. Many support migration into Europe, but many also do support a Europe for Europeans, because they realize that if Europe goes Arab, it will turn against Israel. If Israel ceased to exist, the Jewish international elite would continue to exist and perhaps gain a second wind from not needing to divert energy and political tension to Israel.
However, modern Zionism is not anything like early Zionism. It is founded on the worship of the Holocaust, as the defining moment in Jewish history. And because of the importance of the Holocaust mythos in Jewish collective conscious now, their purpose has shifted to making a world where the ideals of Fascism (which ironically, many of the founding Zionists agreed with) and all forms of European ethnic identity and European tradition are destroyed. In some cases they will accomplish this mission even if it means destroying Zionism, while in others they will abandon it in order to retain their Zionist values.
Now, this decision is important, as Jews are losing their grip on the elite. This is not as nice as it sounds, as they’re being replaced by similarly liberal and ethnocentric immigrants from East and South and SW Asia, and in the case of the Chinese these people have the second most powerful country on earth as their “Israel” (but being the bougie libs they are, they’d probably move to the more developed Taiwan if SHTF in America). Anyways, these POC liberals are much more anti-Israel. Jews will call them antisemitic but it has no effect, look at “The Squad” in USA for example. They can criticize Israel because they just view it from a perspective of Israel being an artifact of European white colonialism. So now I am seeing youth Jews try and dissociate from Zionism, even if they still privately believe in it. Whenever I engage them they say something like “I live in Illinois bro” (stupid zoomer tiktok meme) and “Assuming I am a Zionist is antisemitic”. Meanwhile, we are seeing Jews in Britain and France become more right wing because they are too nearby Muslims to ignore the threat they pose to Jews and Europeans alike. I think it could be even worse being under an Indian-Asian-Chinese elite than under a Jewish elite, but at least they can’t pretend they’re just ordinary white folks.
Speaking of which, I think the best way to view Jews racially is the same way we view Hispanics. Jews don’t identify as white even if some may genetically be within European variation. They might consider themselves White but they identify only with other Jews, and their qualifications for “other jews” are pretty broad. They think a black dude or Mark Zuckerberg’s half Chinese hapa children can be Jews as long as they put on a Yamaka and cut off the tip of their penis. This is kind of like how a 90% white Mexican will still quite often identify with a 20% white Mexican over a 100% White German.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Plumbob, you’re writing as if you fell into a coma 15 years ago and just woke up yesterday. Back in the day I heard people saying everything you’re saying here, and fifteen years later, the absurdity of your pitch, in every facet, is drastically amplified given what we have seen happen in the several years since the whole neocon pretense of caring about Western civilization started its collapse.
The jews who make a show of supporting any sort of border control measures in European lands (European lands upon any continent) make a point of insisting upon the ideology of “civic nationalism” while putting “based” non-Whites to the forefront of their publicity and outreach campaigns. They are not selling nationalism to lukewarm voters, or to European leaders, or to their fellow jews, they are selling the acceptance and even worship of aliens to nationalists and to non-ideologue Whites who just want a government that isn’t trying to kill them.
More importantly, and more decisively disproving of your claims, the work of such coalitions is always to divert nationalist energy of Europeans into shoring up the defense of zionism. The bad faith of these types has become so brazen that you would have to have some understanding of jews as jews to not be shocked by it, as when, for example, one such crew famously raised huge sums of money they claimed was going towards a professional documentary expose about the endemic racially motivated rape gangs plaguing Britain, and instead they produced a movie about how jews are the real victims of contemporary British immigration policy.
Are we really seeing jews become more right wing today? Again, this is a talking point that is a decade out of date. We saw the “counter-jihad” thing rise and fizzle, leaving behind the same result that such projects always have for the past 70 years: Jews remaining in their happy “nationalism for me, not for thee” space, and Whites having yet another thing to be demonized for, just like us Whites, and only us Whites, were demonized for the Barry Goldwater American presidential campaign.
Theodor Herzl was no different than any zionist you will find today. His project was to get jews to form a sovereign base of operations to strengthen the position of jews in the world. His project was successful. Did his success reduce the power of what you call “modern zionism?” Of course not. To say that the security of Israel is at odds with the power of the diaspora is to say that the security of a military’s strategic command center is at odds with the success of that same military’s front line troops. The goal is unified, the two elements support each other, and it requires a lifetime of gaslighting to get us goyim to believe otherwise, in the same way so many of us accept that giving jews a monopoly on banking was an act of anti-semitism.
The core of jewish religion, culture and identity has always been a self-inculcated narrative of aggrieved victimhood. Before The Holocaust, being a jew was about how terrible the pogroms were, before that it was about the unique evil of the siege of Jerusalem, and before that it was about being survivors of the evil Pharaoh’s attempted genocide. Simply read the Old Testament; this narrative of victimhood and revenge is always the core conceit. Read any jewish writing since, and see how nothing has changed.
I suspect you have to be some manner of shill to have the gall to say that jewish power is in any way waning, as Blackrock buys up all the land in America and every anglophone leader is repeating slogans from a group that says jewish communism (redundancy) is the answer to every problem, including cold viruses. Talking about the ascension of China (or India, for that matter) in this context is equally absurd, as China is properly on board with the zionist agenda and happily gives jews their tribute. Thuletide has discussed this a bit on his Telegram channel.
This old “rise of leftist anti-semitism” chestnut you’re pulling out is also particularly absurd in light of the fact that we are in 2022. We have seen the collapse of this narrative in very recent memory. Indeed, “The Squad” is a prime example. Ilhan Omar issued an apology for merely mentioning the fact of AIPAC’s existence, and said that speaking about AIPAC is a tactic of White Supremacy, and that Muslims and jews must work together to silence the voices of White Racists who say debunked canard tropes like pointing out that jews have power. Alexandria Cortez, who claims to be a jew herself, told her supporters that she was being forced against her will to forgo her meaningless protest vote against a zionist congressional bill, and made a show of crying as she cast her vote in favor of zionism. If you want an anti-zionist “POC liberal” (as you put it) to point to in congress, you have to go back to Cynthia McKinney, though I would argue that even the philosemite Ron Paul was a more effective anti-zionist than she was, and there’s simply no contest between any supposed anti-zionist “POC” congressman and Jim Trafficante, who was of course a White man. For whatever reason, Whites consistently resist the demands of jews more readily and more effectively than any other race does. Beliefs to the contrary are entirely the result of media propaganda aimed at making people believe this ridiculous narrative you’re pushing.
Comparing the self-identification of jews to hispanics as if they are merely examples of a similar result from an ostensibly common and separate cause is ridiculous. Hispanics with not a drop of indio blood will self-identify as “La Raza” because there is a century of imposed cultural morality that being White is bad. Where does this, often implied, sometimes explicit, directive come from? It originates from jews. The creator of such a meme is in no way equivalent to a follower of that meme, although to the degree that the simple fact without context tells us anything, what it tells us, in both cases, is that these are groups which have chosen to align themselves distinctly against Whites. What does it tell us that “75% European” Tim Wise is every bit the homicidal anti-White that his collogue Noel Ignatiev is? It tells us that there is an intractable division between our two peoples that even overcomes the apparent biological similarity we have.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not only that, they openly admit the differences between us are irreconciliable…
“There are two life-forces in the world I know: Jewish and gentile, ours and yours…I do not believe that this primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.”
— Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like your comment. Personally as a whit Christian i will side at any moment with a jew who is pro white Christian. A judeo Christian relationship but where we stick to our values not to some bs lgbt, leftism. Pro imigrant and so on.
LikeLike
Great work 👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Calculus of Decay .
LikeLike
Also thuletide I should mention one thing. You said in the article that the Jewish people worship Yahweh however worship of such diety died out after the Jews were kept in Babylonian captivity where they embraced many pagan idol worship and combined many influences from the Canaanites and Babylonians. Saying that the Jewish people are a monotheistic abrahamic religion is also a misnomer for they don’t put much emphasis on the Old Testament unless it’s for PR purposes to save face in front of the gentiles or used as justification to support said ethnocentrism. They put much more faith in the teachings of the Babylonian Talmud and the Kabbalah which I’m sure you heard of former but the latter really goes in how Judaism is a pagan religion with a abrahamic mask. They worship multiple different deities but the main one they worship is Lucifer/leviathan. I’m not sure what your stance is on the religious debate of Christianity vs European paganism is but I believe we should take note that the Jewish people are hostile to both faiths. For more information on the Jewish religion I heavily refer to books by texe marrs most especially his book “the holy serpent of the Jews”. It’s a real eye opener on the Jewish faith that not even many of those in the nationalist right are aware of. Any of his books on Jews are a heavily must read for anyone is interested in the Jewish question. It might also help provide you some good resources in making an article on the Jewish question yourself one that is more detailed and easily referenced.
LikeLike
“Jews do not worship Yahweh, Yahweh worship died out after the Babylonian captivity, after which they became polytheists”
Wrong. Yahweh was originally the head of their polytheistic pantheon and they became MORE montheistic during the Babylonian exile, likely due to Zoroastrian influence.
“Canaanites”
Jews are a subgroup of Canaanites, like Norwegians are a subgroup of Germanics.
“Jews don’t put much emphasis on the Old Testament”
Yes they do, it’s the foundation of all of their other religious texts. E.g. the Talmud is Rabbinic commentary on the Tanakh combined with Jewish laws, and the Zohar is estoeric commentary on the Tanakh.
“Refer to books by Texe Marrs”
Not a reliable source. Firstly, he’s a flat earther and secondly, he seems to be Christian Identity orientated. Christians generally struggle to provide an objective analysis of Judaism because they share holy books with the Jews. Thus they often cope (as you are doing here) by claiming that the Jews actually don’t believe in any of these holy books and are secretly evil devil worshippers or something. The Old Testament aligns with modern Jewish behavior.
LikeLike
Judaism doesn’t worship one god but many gods and goddesses and puts more emphasis on the Talmud and Kabbalah. The Talmud goes over the laws of the Jewish religion while Kabbalah goes over the many beliefs and practices of it. Most especially the tree of life/death where you can find they worship multiple deities such as Lucifer/leviathan, malkuth/moloch, shekinah, hesod, ein sof, etc.
The OT is used as justification for Jewish ethnocentrism and to rule over the gentiles of the earth. The Jews HATE Christianity because it destroys the Jewish peoples chosen status and most especially hate Europeans because said ancestors the Romans destroyed the 2nd temple and later caused the diaspora of the Jews. Not saying Christianity is perfect by any means men such as William Pierce make some fair points. I’m not too much informed about the religious question so I’m not gonna pretend I know what I’m talking about. Our people are mainly Christian and many of those who skew towards our politics will mainly be Christian since many on the right in both America and Europe are very religious and are also the main group against immigration and multiculturalism. Not saying they’re not Christian organizations that are promoting globalism such as the Catholic Church or NGOs.
I have no knowledge of texe marrs being a flat earther but he is certainly not Christian identity. He’s more of a typical Christian civnat boomer who thinks the Jews can be saved through following Christ. Not saying he is perfect by any means but many of his literature is an interesting take on the Jewish religion. I wouldn’t necessarily call myself a Christian however I see things in the way William Pierce saw things if such policies or beliefs help make our people better it is a good policy if it doesn’t it must be rooted out and destroyed. I try to study both European paganism and Christianity and use what I believe will help our people. I personally believe the Christian vs pagan debate must be held off until we can safely secure the existence of our people first. For survival is everything and it doesn’t matter if one brother worships Odin and another worships Christ all that matters is that we exist and continue to exist to achieve our racial destiny of the Faustian spirit.
LikeLike
Wrong but I’m not going to point out where or why because I don’t want to read any more rambling textwalls. Don’t post any more of them, they will be deleted.
LikeLike
Your wrong Thule. If there is a secular explanation for monotheism in ancient Israel it is that the Israelites picked it up from the Egyptian worship of Aton.
LikeLike
Tha seems like a pretty far-fetched theory. The Jews weren’t even in Egypt and they became monotheistic from the 700 BCs onward, so the timescale doesn’t even add up.
LikeLike
To Thule. I don’t know how you have come to the conclusion the Israelites were not monotheistic until 700, they were not even in Egypt, and the timelines don’t add up.
The cult of Aton coincides with the timeline of the exodus story. The Hyksos are of a similar timeline to the Joseph story. Hyksos may even be an Egyptian word for Hebrew. The Jericho archeological digs support the exodus story as well.
LikeLike
The exodus story is a complete fabrication, like many other Biblical tales.
LikeLike
Op-ed by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz
“new centers of power are emerging in a multipolar world, and we aim to establish and expand partnerships with all of them”
Multipolarity next stage of globalism
https://www.politico.eu/article/olaf-scholz-we-dont-want-to-decouple-from-china-but-cant-be-overreliant/
LikeLike
Was my comment deleted?
LikeLike
Too long and rambling. It was all over the place and I got bored of reading it to make sure it didn’t contain any weird stuff so I just unpublished it.
LikeLike
It was hardly not much longer than other comments here and it was on topic, elaborating on the subjects in the article with the secular versions of Judaism during the latest centuries. Oh, well.
LikeLike
The post was public for a few minutes, and I happened to catch it. Your whole “right and left are the same, and created in recent history” position has already been thoroughly refuted by “Hunnenschlächter” in the comment section where you posted that garbage before:
This is an ancient White understanding that precedes jewish corruption of our language and culture. The one thing that can be said in support of your post is that jews are the only group operating within White civilization who have come out and explicitly said “yeah, we’re on the side of evil” and won victory.
LikeLike
Nothing has been refuted, it’s your feelings talking.
Link to my answer:
LikeLike
Hal, you are belligerently stupid.
LikeLike
thuletide, do you have any idea why putin invaded ukraine? And why did the western elites got so angry at him?
LikeLike
Simply because he wants to recreate the USSR.
The justifications that Russians (and Russophiles) give that Russia was “threatened by NATO” being on their border makes no sense because Ukraine wasn’t in NATO, there are already NATO countries on Russia’s border, and invading/conquering Ukraine would bring Russia even closer to NATO countries.
So I can only conclude that it was a war of aggression, and this is in line with Russia’s state ideology of Neo-Eurasianist imperialism.
LikeLike
thanks for the reply,
I also think it’s the most plausible option, but I still can’t wrap my head around it because it seems so absurd to think that the elites in Russia would want something like that.
It doesn’t feel like something that they truly need, at least for my point of view, and it’s worse for their power to have started this war than to not have started it at all.
At the same time people take risks and have weird goals.
LikeLike
Now thuletide go full mode in supporting jewlensky propaganda of rusia imperialism. Isn’t you thuletide the one who said that we need to stop using leftist points and messages? Now you are full leftist with the idea that muuh bad putin will conquer the world. We need to be more nationalist. Not dying for Ukraine but also not for rusia. In the end ukraine have stolen land from Poland Romania Hungary
LikeLike
crackhead
LikeLike
Read perestroika deception and new lies for old it basically goes over how the USSR faked its collapse so that the west would drop its guard and be destroyed by cultural Marxism. While the west sinks into decay the sino soviet axis will invade and proclaim themselves as “liberators”. Russia is not this nationalist conservative paradise that many on the right in the west think it is. It’s just a decaying commie hellhole suffering from immigration Jewish totalitarianism as much as the west is. Just the fact that Putin pushed for vaccines and lockdowns should tell all you need to know who’s side he’s on. Not to mention blaming the west for “white supremacy” and spewing muh raycism leftist talking points in his most recent speeches. Plus he’s enlisting nonwhite troops such as chechens, tartars, mongols, Arabs, and Congolese mercenaries on the frontlines in Ukraine because they will show no mercy to Ukrainians unlike the Russian troops who still see them as their Slavic kinsman despite kremlin propaganda. Make no mistake the western governments are in no high ground whatsoever in this situation but are just trying to save their own asses plus they’re still following the script of the dog and pony show of political theater.
LikeLiked by 2 people
thanks,
I have that book on my reading list, but it’s not like I’m a fast reader. Maybe I should give this book priority.
Thing is that this conspiracy would be more than 30 years old.
I can see a conspiracy like the one with the vax/covid/qrcodes which requires a few years taking place, but I can’t see people committing to a multi-generational conspiracy.
Of course I should read the book before judging, but I won’t hide that I have strong skepticism on this (at least as far as I’ve udnerstood it).
LikeLike
You can run a multi generational conspiracy as long as you manage to enlist new people to keep running it along the way. If you’re a clique of rich and powerful people, attracting scum willing to join is gonna be fairly easy as there’s plenty to gain for them if only in influence even if you don’t have succeeded yet (or do at all).
Then you just have to cement it so they don’t try to leave leave and/or backstab you. Hence why the pseudo-cults and other Epstein diddlery blackmail networks.
The hard part is launching it, as it’s hard to have enough foresight to be willing to start plotting something you may not see the results of. (((Religion))) is one way, but i’ll point out that in globalist documentation, they pretty much always believed they’d succeed within a few decades, within their lifetimes. Thule has the docs where they mention it being done before the 80s, and even the 18 and 19 century secret societies that made up proto-globalism probably didn’t expect not to succeed within 20 years either.
LikeLike
I think it’s worth noting that before the invasion of Ukraine, Klaus Shwab, the man who said “we need to do communism because of cold viruses,” “we need to communism because of cyberattacks,” and “we need to do communism because the ice caps are going to melt a third time,” also said “we need to do communism because of international conflicts and breakdowns in international trade,” then all of sudden Putin did a war and America did sanctions.
Here’s a video of Putin talking about his total support for the WEF: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIwSkPL0USw
Note that “unipolarity” is a communist word, and like all communist words, it is an inversion. “Fascism” is when non-communists are allowed to own anything, and “unipolarity” is when there is any refuge from otherwise global domination. Putin does not object to America forcing jewish rules upon the rest of the world, what he objects to is that America is the one major country where the Whites are allowed to be armed and allowed to disagree with jews.
LikeLike
Have you read this study:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23241444/
I’ve only read the abstract but it says genetic testing supports the khazarian hypothesis
LikeLike
yeah it’s BS, genetic testing does not support the khazarian hypothesis at all. Khazars were of East Asian origin, so if Ashknazis descended from Khazars, they’d have obvious East Asian influenced DNA and phenotypes, like Tatars or other Turkic people.
LikeLike
“The ‘Rhineland hypothesis’ depicts Eastern European Jews as a ‘population isolate’ that emerged from a small group of German Jews who migrated eastward and expanded rapidly. Alternatively, the ‘Khazarian hypothesis’ suggests that Eastern European Jews descended from the Khazars . . . Recent sequencing of modern Caucasus populations prompted us to revisit the Khazarian hypothesis and *compare it with the Rhineland hypothesis.* We applied a wide range of population genetic analyses to compare *these two hypotheses.* Our findings support the Khazarian hypothesis and *portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Near Eastern-Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries*”
I’m not sure if I’m interpreting this correctly, but it reads to me like the author is saying that the ashkenazi genome looks like it did not come from a single isolated branch that inhabited Germany for many generations, but rather looks looks more like the ashkenazi came from a broader semitic population that spread throughout Europe not from Germany, but simply from the area you would expect the jews to migrate through at some point in their diaspora journey before they got to Germany.
If the findings I quoted here are accurate, it seems to me that this is actually debunking “the askenazi are just White people” nonsense, and the (blatantly motivated) author is just assuming as a matter of definition that the only choices are “ashkenazi be White fake jews” and “ashkenazi be Khazar fake jews.”
LikeLike
I saw a meme that used a headline about a demographic study on how Jews are already a minority in Israel if you account for all people within the territory and not just citizens. Assuming this is true, there is probably a discussion to be had on :
– The future of Israel in these conditions, which i believe to be Lebanon given how hostile the non Jew “immigrants” are and the presence of 2 clearly defined sides each with weapon suppliers and funding. (vs western countries which lack this and would struggle to have a proper civil war happen)
– The failure of nationalistic policies there despite there being a real political will, which is not a good sign for us if we wanna use similar methods for our own goals. They may have poisoned themselves with leftism (and wanting cheap foreign labor, let’s not forget what we call the “liberal right” in my country) but we already have to deal with those elements too.
– The consequences this would have :
– On us (a wave of refugees including both more Palestinians and subversive elements ?)
– On western policy (even more money flowing to the war from our pockets ?)
– On Jewish activity (They’d get fucked hard which would induce change of some sort by reaction, at least in methodology even if the endgoal stays the same.)
– On the NWO plan as a whole (possibly getting disrupted enough for them to have to improvise a bit, which could lead to fuckups that may or may not benefit us).
I get forwarded your telegram posts by insiders so you could have a debate there too maybe. As the topic would stop being beating around the bush about being pro or against Israel and move to “this is gonna go to shit no matter what we do, how should we react to if not benefit, at least minimize trouble for us.”
LikeLike