Too many Right-Wingers have adopted Marija Gimbutas’ crazy feminist lies about Neolithic Europe, so here are some studies that debunk them. I’ll update this article as I find more studies.
“Compiling data from various sources, it becomes apparent that violence was endemic in Neolithic [northwestern] Europe, sometimes reaching levels of intergroup hostilities that ended in the utter destruction of entire communities. […] Increasing competition and inequality are key factors that fostered the emergence of larger-scale human conflict and warfare.”
— Source: Conflict, violence, and warfare among early farmers in Northwestern Europe (2023)
“The new evidence presented here for unequivocal lethal violence on a large scale is put into perspective for the Early Neolithic of Central Europe and, in conjunction with previous results, indicates that massacres of entire communities were not isolated occurrences but rather were frequent features of the last phases of the LBK. […] A new violence-related pattern was identified here: the intentional and systematic breaking of lower limbs. The abundance of the identified perimortem fractures clearly indicates torture and/or mutilation of the victims.”
— Source: The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in Early Neolithic Central Europe (2015)
“The scale and sophistication of megalithic architecture along the Atlantic seaboard, culminating in the great passage tomb complexes, is particularly impressive. […] the human expenditure required to erect the largest monuments has led some researchers to emphasize hierarchy, of which the most extreme case is a small elite marshalling the labour of the masses. Here we present evidence that a social stratum of this type was established during the Neolithic period in Ireland […] patrilineal royal families that are headed by god-kings”
— Source: A dynastic elite in monumental Neolithic society (2020)
“Here we report ancient DNA, strontium isotope and contextual data from more than 100 individuals […] dated to the western European Neolithic around 4850–4500 bc. We find that this burial community was genetically connected by two main pedigrees, spanning seven generations, that were patrilocal and patrilineal, with evidence for female exogamy. […] The differences between younger and older-age sex ratios suggest that older daughters, from around the age of 15, left to join new groups, again consistent with a female exogamic residential system.”
— Source: Extensive pedigrees reveal the social organization of a Neolithic community (2023)
Thuletide 
Important post. While it may seem like a minor thing, the idea of the “longhouse” needs to be combatted. Not only because it is historically inaccurate, but because it is very subversive.
Supposedly, it is meant to describe our feminized society, but half of the time it’s used to create a false dichotomy between White in-group preference/nationalism and elitism/individual excellence.
BAP will retweet TND memes and Nazi edits, but then say race blind “true” meritocracy without ethnic nepotism -an impossibility- would see Whites rise to the top and somehow solve America’s problems. If you say Whites shouldn’t have to compete with tribalistic Asians and jews for positions of power in their own societies, you get called a wignat.
The esoteric 4chan case for why White in-group preference is bad, not because it’s racist, but because it is “longhoused” or “ethnonarcissistic”. The rw anon case for why talking about The Great Replacement and the globalist elite is bad, not because it’s a right-wing conspiracy theory, but because it’s “demoralizing” and it’s more “nuanced” than that and the elite is actually “decentrilized”. The eugenicist case against socially enforcing traditional morality, not because that’d make you a square and a bigot, but because once the biological decay sets in, morality cannot be reestablished.
BAPsphere is the shitposter grandson of neoconservatism; a very roundabout right-wing case for passively accepting the dismantling of our society.
LikeLike
Yeah BAP has consistently posted subversive trash over the years. Takes a little while to notice it because, as you say, he always retweets the most extremist content available on Twitter, spends his time boosting smaller accounts (good way to gain a loyal following), and so on.
LikeLike
No surprise that he was doxxed as being a jew…
LikeLike
“esoteric 4chan” I never though I’d hear such a phrase,for 4chan of all places.But yeah that site is a fed hive,a grooming fertile ground for mass shooters.
LikeLike
hello friend.
It’s the first time I comment on the blog, but I’ve been following it for some time, in addition to being a serious source of information, it doesn’t get carried away by propagandist political and moral studies. keeps
Anyway, I would like to know what your analysis of Minoan Crete is.
something extremely controversial when it comes to the social and gender part….
and unfortunately when we researched this, I don’t say all, but a large number of articles treat them as a matriarchal civilization. the arguments are several, from a supposed female pantheon, queens in the main position, women as the social center…. (even literally a parallel I saw with “menstrual blood” LOL)
Anyway, I would like to know your analysis on this. and if you want I can cite some sources where some things. Hugs and sorry for the English… I’m from Italy lol
LikeLike
I haven’t conducted any research on this topic, but I think any civilization that allows their women to walk around dressed like whores is probably not a patriarchy. At the same time, I doubt that a matriarchy could maintain civilization for thousands of years. Maybe they became matriarchal at some point?
LikeLike
I thought exactly the same thing as you!
honestly, a “matriarchy” does not allow for human development, and the concept of family is extremely dead, degeneracy and infidelity being the norm… the father does not take care of the children… lol.
But I have the same doubts as yours.
why would a society let its women walk around like whores? who knows; Were they already in decline when such trends emerged? like our modern world? anyway thanks for replying and if you think to do some research and do your analysis that would be interesting. God bless you and your family
LikeLike
What do you think of Ian McClain’s (Fortress of Lugh) new video about Europe’s origins?
LikeLike
Seems pretty good. I only noticed one or two minor inaccuracies when I watched it, but I already forgot what they were.
LikeLike
Hey SP, did u just get sh*ahed a few hours ago?
LikeLike
oops nevermind, sorry for pestering you here.
LikeLike
The Minoans were definitely not “matriarchal” in the traditional sense of the word but it may be that women had more political and social power then in contemporary Bronze Age societies. All serious scholars of Minoan history recognize distinct gender roles within Minoan society with men doing more traditionally masculine tasks like farming, hunting, fishing, and trading while women did more traditionally feminine tasks like taking care of children, preparing food, and taking care of the household. Women also likely played a large role in religious life with certain young women becoming priestesses. While no one knows exactly what their political system was like, it seems a small number of aristocratic families controlled the body politic of Crete. This was in stark contrast to the monarchies of the near East and may have even resembled a sort of proto democracy. As far as Minoan artwork, it’s likely that Minoan women didn’t actually dress with their breasts showing. This was probably artistic license that was meant to express the beauty and fertility of women. Ultimately, until Linear A is deciphered, we will continue to have to relay on guess work. But the most that can be said based on current evidence of Minoan civilization is that Minoan women enjoyed more social and political equality then did women in near eastern societies. There is no evidence that the Minoans were literally “matriarchal“ and such notions have been dismissed by historians since the 1970s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
TY, I don’t know much about Minoan civilization.
LikeLike
well, i honestly never believed that vehemently.
however, if the issue of women having more social and political equality, and political power is real….
well, many ancient Greeks and Romans were against such an idea, and in our modern world, what happened when women had such powers? so it is.
anyway, is this really something factual? well-established that they had more power and “equality” compared to other societies?
and on questions about clothing, I assume I had never read such an explanation. well, but honestly it’s hard for me to believe a little, because certain representations are like “day to day”… but I don’t doubt it….
and finally, do you know of any neutral sources on the “matrilineal” issue? the 3rd source I read, and even my college history professor, said they were matrilineal…. well, we know what a familiar mess it is when such “models” are put into practice. lol.
LikeLike