800 words
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Genetics
3. Phenotype
4. Etymology
5. History
1. Introduction
I’m frequently asked this question, so here’s your definitive answer:
No. Ashkenazi Jews are not White/European.
Ashkenazi Jews are not genetically European, nor are they culturally European. In their own Jewish-orientated mainstream media, which is generally not intended for non-Jewish audiences, they adamantly state that Jews are not White/European.
The only time that Ashkenazim ever claim to be European is when they are attacking European religion, art, history, culture, philosophy, etc. “Hello, Fellow Whites…” At all other times, they claim to be a non-White minority group (which they are) and the poor, oppressed victims of nasty European “White Supremacism” (which they are not).
2. Genetics
Today, there are three major Jewish sub-races:
- Ashkenazim, Jews who live in European countries and Isreal.
- Mizrahim, who live in various regions of the Middle East.
- Sephardim, who mostly live in North Africa (Jews who were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula).
Each sub-race has a unique genetic makeup, as they interbred with the various natives of the regions they inhabit. We’re only concerned with Ashkenazim because there is no debate whether Mizrahim and Sephardim are European/White or not (they aren’t).
Recent genetic studies have found that Ashkenazim are a mix of Bronze Age Levantines and Southern Europeans, with some minor Northern European admixture. A 2017 study estimated that modern Ashkenazim were around 50% Middle Eastern, 34% Southern European, and 16% Northern European, varying between East and West. Similarly, a 2020 study found that modern Ashkenazim were over 50% Bronze Age Levantine and 41% European.
Ashkenazim are NOT Khazars. They have no Turkic or Central Asian ancestry.
In principal component analysis studies, Ashkenazim form a unique genetic cluster between the Middle Eastern and European races, with some minor overlap between the two. For reference, Mizrahim and Sephardim cluster with their fellow Middle East and North African peoples.
Here’s the same PCA with the Jewish populations edited out. As you can see, Ashkenazim form a genetic bridge between the Middle East and Europe.
Earlier DNA studies found that most European DNA in the Ashkenazi gene pool dates back to their original expansion into Europe, and is predominantly derived from Italian women. This admixture event was coupled with some sort of genetic bottleneck event.
European admixture among Ashkenazim somewhat increased after the 1800s, when Jewish Emancipation enabled them to interbreed with non-Jews in Europe. Before this point, Ashkenazim were a highly insular, ghettoized population that interbred almost exclusively with other Ashkenazim (more on this in the History section). However, even after emancipation, they still remained largely insular and did not intermix with Europeans.
Ashkenazi Y-DNA haplogroups (male lineages) are predominantly found in the Middle East; J1, J2, E1, G. If you don’t know what a haplogroup is, read this article.
3. Phenotype
Some Ashkenazim (particularly those in Hollywood) look considerably more European than others. However, the overwhelming majority have distinctly non-European phenotypes that are obviously Middle Eastern in origin. The image below is a compilation of Ashkenazi phenotypes.
4. Etymology
The name ‘Ashkenazi’ is derived from the Biblical kingdom of Ashkenaz, which was first associated with the Scythians, then with the Slavic regions, and later with Germany and northern Europe. So, ‘Ashkenaz’ basically means “blonde-haired White people land” and ‘Askenazi’ means “Jew who lives in blonde-haired White people land.”
This does not mean that Ashkenazi Jews are literally Scythians, Slavs, or Germans, and it also doesn’t mean that Scythians, Slavs, and Germans are the “real Biblical Israelites.”
5. History
- Note: I’m currently writing a longer article chronicling Jewish history, so this is an incredibly brief summary.
Ashkenazi Jews are a genetically and culturally Middle Eastern people, who only began to “integrate” into European society after the rise of Liberalism in the 18th Century, around two thousand years after they first arrived on the continent. Their history in Europe is one of being continually massacred, excluded, and expelled from every single European country that they have ever inhabited.
Don’t take my word for it, check these Wikipedia articles:
– https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsions_and_exoduses_of_Jews
– https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_antisemitism
Although Jews have lived in Europe since the days of the Roman Empire, they have always dwelled in self-segregated, insular communities as an isolated, alien population. This was the case even before Europeans forcibly segregated them by law (which began around the start of the Second Millennium).
Harsh anti-Jewish attitudes have been extremely prevalent throughout Europe from the BC era until the Liberal revolutions of the 18th and 19th Centuries began the process of Jewish emancipation. [Note: Read more about racism in ancient Greco-Roman society in this article]. Even after Jewish emancipation took place, many Europeans remained overtly hostile to the Jewish population.
It should also be noted that Jews (both Sephardi and Ashkenazi) have continually assisted foreign races in their attempts to colonize Europe, such as the Seljuk Turks who invaded Anatolia, the Ottomans who invaded Eastern Europe, and the Moors who invaded Iberia (Portugal and Spain).
The relationship between Europeans and Jews can only be described as venomous and hostile, on both sides. They are two distinct peoples who have, essentially, been in conflict with one another for thousands of years. No honest man, who is even vaguely familiar with the history of Jews in Europe, could conclude otherwise. To claim that Europeans and Jews are “one people” is even more delusional than claiming that Israelis and Palestinians are one people.
I have seen people asserting that today’s Jews have almost no genetic connection with what real Hebrew Jews had. Is it true?
LikeLike
100% false. They are directly descended from the ancient Israelites.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How do you know?
Wern’t people from that part of the world darker than europeans?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Genetics combined with historical accounts of migration patterns and so on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could ‘Jews’ in modern day age be related to Edomites, Caananites and Khazars? I ask because there was a rabinate living in the Ashkenaz area of Russia who came to Edom and Judea, with his army in 127 AD, forcefulyl converted a large population to rabinism.
LikeLike
They’re just Israelites who migrated out of Israel/Judea and mixed with Europeans. They half half European DNA and half Israelite DNA.
LikeLike
Have you read these, the Non-Jewish origins of teh Ashkenazi Jews and the non-Jewish origins of the Sephardi by Paul Wexler?
LikeLike
Nope and I’m not gonna waste my time reading them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And this evidence if from DNA studies?
Other lingustic studies show that Yiddish and Ashkenazic folk culture and religion provide a wealth of varied evidence that support a primarily Slavic ethnic origin for the Ashkenazic Jews. But reading your blog, the DNA evidence, in regards to the study you listed, shows that Jews are not of Turkic-Asiatic origin.
My gripe, or, rather, my confusion, is with those Jews who reject this theory, claiming that Ashkenazi Jews are of non-Semitic origin.
>>>”We conclude that the genome of European Jews is a tapestry of ancient populations including Judaised Khazars, Greco-Roman Jews, Mesopotamian Jews and Judeans,” says Elhaik.
>>”Their population structure was formed in the Caucasus and the banks of the Volga, with roots stretching to Canaan and the banks of the Jordan.”
Many things are unknown about the Khazars, whose tribal confederation gathered Slavs, Scythians, Hunnic-Bulgars, Iranians, Alans and Turks.
But, argues Elhaik, the tale sketched in the genes is backed by archaeological findings, by Jewish literature that describes the Khazars’ conversion to Judaism, and by language, too.
>>>”Yiddish, the language of Central and Eastern European Jews, began as a Slavic language” before being reclassified as High German, he notes.
Another pointer is that European Jews and their ancestral groups in the Caucasus and Middle East share a relatively high risk of diseases such as cystic fibrosis.
>>>DNA only has 3% ancient ancestry which links them with the Eastern Mediterranean (also known as the Middle East) – namely Israel, Lebanon, parts of Syria, and western Jordan.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2017.00087/full
>>>Remarkably, AJs exhibit a dominant Iranian (88%) and residual Levantine (3%) ancestries, as opposed to Bedouins (14% and 68%, respectively) and Palestinians (18% and 58%, respectively). [Palestinians are Semitic; Ashkenazis are not – ed.] …
______
While I make no conclusions, I think it would be insightful if you could explain why and how Elhaik is wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
100% correct. Ashkenazi Jews are 86% Slavic and dna proves it. Though the propaganda tries to deny it. Mizrahi are 88% Arab.
LikeLike
copious DNA evidence is listed in this article you retard, Ashkenazi jews are not slavic
LikeLike
Are you retarded?
LikeLike
Could you please make a post about Greeks and Spaniards?
LikeLiked by 2 people
You mean like an ethnogenesis article, like my Italy article?
LikeLike
That would be a good idea. I have seen people calling Iberia non white middle eastern Europeans and so on. But it’s far from the truth if you go to Portugal the people the would look Celtic with medium brown hair. Their is that time occusnaily were one of them looks non white and could easily pass as a middle easterners or a north African am saying this off of personal experience.
LikeLike
https://twitter.com/razibkhan/status/1346279970600079362
https://twitter.com/Surashatruhan/status/1345402738692091906
Have you considered posting about the “debate” between Aryan Invasion in India and its opposition?
LikeLike
I wrote an article about that before but it was too long and rambling and poor quality so deleted. The topic isn’t really worth addressing since Indo-European expansion is now fully accepted in the West.
LikeLike
Hello,
could you make a post about the relation between human phenotype and genotype? How precisely could the race be predicted by the phenotypic traits?
Thank you.
LikeLike
Phenotype is 100% defined by genotype, explained here: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/02/race-101-genetics-glossary/
Race can be predicted with 100% accuracy just from phenotype even for 99% of mixed race people. Morphology is how scientists have historically defined race.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That isn’t what the word phenotype means. Phenotype refers to observable characteristics, i.e., the combination of genes (including the additive component, but also dominance effects, epistatic effects, and so on) and environment.
LikeLike
yea I should maybe edit that to include environmental factors but phenotype is still 100% defined by genes
LikeLike
If genotype = phenotype, are those Jews that have particularly European phenotypes, genotypically European?
LikeLike
Genotype =/= phenotype. Read the linked article.
LikeLike
yes i agree 100 percent. Genetics are a manifestation of ones soul which will be seen in ones outward appearence. One will always look like what they are genetically.
LikeLike
And also how much the genetic racial groups overlaps with the traditional racial groups of physical anthropology like nordid, med, alpinid, baltid etc.?
LikeLike
Those are phenotype descriptions but they overlap strongly with genetics because phenotype is defined by DNA.
LikeLike
Hey, what happened to page “Are Iranian white?” It’s missing.
LikeLike
Just editing it. Will be back soon.
LikeLike
If they are partially non-white then why does ashkenazi DNA come up under European on 23&me and ancestry DNA? Just wondering.
LikeLike
Probably because 23andMe is a Jewish-owned company and Ashkenazi Jews like to pretend that they’re native Europeans and not a Middle Eastern population that migrated into Europe. Unless they’re talking about Israel, then they magically become Middle Eastern again.
LikeLike
Good point there. I for some reason didn’t think of that.
LikeLike
I could be wrong but that’s usually how they do things.
Maybe it’s because the modern Ashkenazi population was formed in Europe, but even then it would still make more sense to classify them with other Levantine people, considering most of their ancestry is from Israel.
This is what the 23andMe site says (https://customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/articles/212169298-23andMe-Reference-Populations-Regions#h_99a0673a-8d08-4445-907e-03e298eb0c5c) :
“Ashkenazi Jewish people settled in Central and Eastern Europe in the late Middle Ages, but their modern descendants remain genetically more similar to other Jewish populations than to their European neighbors, reflecting shared western Asian origins. In the twentieth century, many Ashkenazi Jewish people immigrated to Israel or to the Americas in search of greater cultural and religious acceptance. Today, over five million ethnic Ashkenazi Jewish people live in the U.S.”
“Although not a country or region, they have their own reference population in Ancestry Composition because Ashkenazi Jews are so genetically distinct.”
By other Jewish populations they mean North African and Middle Eastern Jews.
LikeLike
Because ashkenazim have recent admixture from Southern Europeans, that’s why really. As well as cultural developments there.
LikeLike
What would you make of the Jews own claim that they aren’t Israelites:
“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew. -1980 Jewish Almanac p. 3”
Many have speculated that the Khazars became the ancestors of Ashkenazi Jews.
… In 2012, Israeli researcher Eran Elhaik published a study claiming to prove that Khazar ancestry is the single largest element in the Ashkenazi gene pool. Sand declared himself vindicated, and progressive organs such as Haaretz and The Forward trumpeted the results.
Israel seems finally to have thrown in the towel. A blue-ribbon team of scholars from leading research institutions and museums has just issued a secret report to the government, acknowledging that European Jews are in fact Khazars.
The Jewish author Arthur Koestler made this same argument in his 1976 book, The Thirteenth Tribe, where he claimed:
“[The] large majority of surviving Jews in the world is of Eastern European, and thus perhaps mainly of Khazar origin. If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob [Israelites].”
The Jewish historian and anti-Zionist quoted above, Benjamin Freedman, also argued that Jews are in fact Khazars – not Israelites:
“The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom are certainly incontestable historical facts. These incontestable historic facts also establish beyond any question of doubt the origin and history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe. The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar kingdom and their relationship to the origin and early history of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” in eastern Europe was one of history’s best kept secrets until wide publicity was given in recent years to my research on this subject.”
Finally, the Jewish author Shlomo Sand in his book The Invention of the Jewish People also wrote that today’s Jews are in fact Khazars.
LikeLike
Khazars were an ethnically East Asian Turkic people and Ashkenazi Jews are not East Asiatic in the slightest. Whatever they claim about being Khazars is wrong, the genetic evidence doesn’t lie. They are half Israelite, half European.
LikeLike
There is nothing to suggest that they have any affinity with the ancient Israelites they are a mix of many different groups, a bastardized people giving the illusion that they are Israelites. They themselves admit this, recent genetic studies not just Elan Elhaik’s have found that they not only have traces of Khazar populations but that they have significant Canaanite ancestry as well, for years writers have discussed that the Jews are a Edomite-Canaanite people and recent genetic studies confirm this.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/history/article/dna-from-biblical-canaanites-lives-modern-arabs-jews
https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/report-finds-ashkinazi-jews-descended-from-turks/
https://christiansfortruth.com/new-dna-study-confirms-jews-and-arabs-share-up-to-50-canaanite-genetic-ancestry/
LikeLike
What you’re saying makes no sense, Israelites were a subgroup of Canaanites. If they were descended from Turks, they would look like Turks, but they don’t. They look like Levantine people mixed with European people, which is what they are.
LikeLike
Basically, some Jews are probably from Israelite blood but they have no right to pillage and plunder Palestinian land nor do they have a right to confiscate it and murder and rape them off of it.
LikeLike
god damn stop filling my comment section with crap I’m deleting the rest of your posts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems like propaganda and cherry-picked data.
Your data is cherry picked to meet a preconceived narrative that you obviously have; your blog is biased and total devoid of any scientific impartially.
You have a political agenda and it shows.
Ashkenazim are squarely in the Southern Euro Autosomal cluster, and look very much like modern Greco-Roman Europeans in the Balkan/Italian Peninsula when you compare their autosomal DNA results.
Greco-Roman Europeans and Albanians for that matter all have a large Middle Eastern component that goes to hybrid levels as you go to south Italy/Sicily and the Greek islands/Peloponneses.
Ashkenazi Jews also have high genetic affinity with Slavs in Macedonia and to a lesser extent with Bulgarian Slavs.
Ashkenazi Jews have high genetic affinity with Gagauz people in southern Moldova and southwestern Ukraine.
Ashkenazi Jews also have high genetic affinity with French Corsicans.
Garbage blog, more propaganda than anything else.
I’m used to nonsense like this from political propagandists and clowns.
LikeLike
The data I used is from the 2 most recent and highest quality autosomal genetic studies. Ashkenazim are half Middle Eastern and half European, and they cluster on principal component analysis between Europeans and Middle Easterners, forming a unique population that fits into neither group.
And Europeans don’t have a “large Middle Eastern component” we have ~half ancestry from ancient Anatolian Farmers, who were not Middle Eastern but near-identical to modern Sardinians. If anything people of the northern Middle East have a large European component since they have a lot of Anatolian Farmer ancestry.
Stay mad
LikeLike
The article is right. Most of the comments here are based on pure guesswork.
For example, there are historians who say that there is no evidence that all Khazars converted to Judaism but that they were only successful among the elite. And furthermore in Eastern Europe, Middle East, etc., what defines their ethnicity is their paternal heritage, in the case of Jewish Rabbinist Jews, it is their maternal heritage. But what I mean is that even though some modern hrebs have minority Hebrew blood in their veins , they have ethnic identity , which is what counts in the definition and membership of a particular people , and so do Copts who have less blood . egyptian per se , than egyptian muslims , but they have the ethnic identity that others do not have .
LikeLike
Ashkenazim are or a very similar genetic make to to Sicilians/south Italians and Peloponnese and Greek Islanders.
Meaning Greco-Roman European like genetically.
End of lesson.
LikeLike
no, they’re 50% middle eastern, 30% south european, and 20% north european, so nothing at all like greco-roman european ancestry
LikeLike
PCAs are good for showing genetic relatedness. For example, Northern Italians are related to the Spanish and to Tuscan Italians. But PCA’s can be fooled by recent admixture. A half English, half Korean person would cluster on a PCA with Central Asian ethnic groups, yet the person isn’t Central Asian, but a half breed of NW European and an East Asian. Ashkenazi Jews are a recent admixed group, from the Common Era probably around the breakup of the Roman Empire into a decaying West and blooming East. So, Ashkenazi Jews have different origins to Southern Europeans you mentioned who have an older pedigree and from Europe.
LikeLike
Hello, I am searching for some articles about Prehistoric Humans somewhere between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago.
Also, earlier history of the humans, like around early bronze age, if you can recommend books or good fair studies on this topic.
Also, early jewish history, I’ve read a lot of books, but can’t find direct examples of mention of jews and phoenicians in early historical period, for example 1600 BC and before. Earlier timelines are great too, though.
LikeLike
The Wikipedia summaries of the Upper Paleolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic are actually pretty good. You’ll find a lot of references to read there. The articles generally cite the most up-to-date genetic studies, and the people who edit them are mostly anthropology autists rather than LGBT Communists.
As for Jewish history, the Wikipedia page “Jewish history” is also surprisingly reliable and honest. For example, it debunks the nonsensical claim that they originated as slaves in Egypt. There isn’t any specific information on Israelites before 1500 BC and Phoenicians before 3000 BC. There is archaeological and genetic evidence of various cultures in the Levant thought. Again, check the Wiki pages “Prehistory of the Levant” and “History of the ancient Levant” and you’ll find some sources.
Here’s an admixture analysis of West Eurasia from Paleolithic to modern day:
LikeLike
Whites in Europe originally lived in the Middle East/Central Asia/Southwest Asia and only after the Ice Age broke about 12,000 years ago did these populations mass migrate into the now hospitable and habitable European territory.
Jews are a remnant White population that stayed behind longer and mixed/hybridized with population groups of non-White populations that surged into the Middle East/Central Asia/Southwest Asia areas from the South during this past climatic shift. And these groups continue to ‘follow the current’ and are, now, mass migrating into the Northern Hemisphere – to civilization.
Jews are not White in this sense of having mixed with non-Whites and their general phenotype changing accordingly; hence why they were taught the religious truths they were in an attempt to arrest their being subsumed fully into the non-White populations that they were starting to interbreed with.
The hostility between ‘Whites’ and ‘Jews’ flows directly from these past dynamics.
Ironically, it is the Jews who are, today, leading the re-colonization of these past regions that, in the course of time, Whites will migrate to and re-settle in as the Northern Hemisphere, once again, becomes largely uninhabitable as we move into the next Age.
As the Wheel turns…
LikeLike
Some of modern Europeans have lived in Europe since 38,000 BC and relations between Whites and Jews are unrelated to Stone Age history. I recommend you read some studies on human origins, e.g. https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/138662/2/hdl_138662.pdf, or even the Genetic History of Europe Wikipedia page, which is well-cited with mostly up-to-date studies.
The ancestors of Europeans and Middle Easterners diverged 45,000 to 25,000 years ago from a genetically homogeneous ‘West Eurasian’ or Caucasoid population, but this population was not White/European as we use the term today.
Stone Age Middle Easterners did mix with a ghost population named Basal Eurasian, which probably lived in the Saudi Penninsula, but we have no information on their appearance. It was probably Caucasoid-like, judging by their descendants. Saudis have most Basal Eurasian ancestry today.
Some European ancestors, the Ancient North Eurasians, lived in northern Siberia during the Ice Age and migrated west into Eastern Europe as the Holocene approached: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_North_Eurasian. They were Caucasoid with some East Asian-related ancestry and carried genes for blond hair.
Some European ancestors, the Early European Farmers, lived in Western Anatolia during the Ice Age and migrated north into Europed during the Holocene: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_European_Farmers. They were also Caucasoid and had light skin pigmentation.
LikeLike