I blame the Alt-Right and “Third Positionists” for ideologically crippling the Right-Wing. I wasn’t going to write about this shit anymore, but the recent Critical Race Theory business made me realize just how destructive their bullshit was.
Before 2017, the Right-Wing — especially the anon “far-right” — made great progress in exposing the Left’s cultural subversion, their Long March Through the Institutions, and the Marxist lineage of their subversive ideological tools (critical race theory, postcolonialism, sexual revolution, intersectionality, etc.).
These tools are broadly categorized as “cultural studies” and form the theoretical underpinning of the Left’s relentless attack on White people, which they frame as a never-ending “critique” of White culture.
Look up “Cultural Marxism” on YouTube and you’ll find a lot of Leftist content, produced from 2015 to 2017, whining about the Right-Wing exposing their culture war,* its ideological lineage, and fundamental goals (which can be summarized as ‘the total destruction of the West’).
* I don’t use the term disparagingly, they literally declared war on our culture.
To this day, Leftists furiously whine about Jordan Peterson’s (correct) analysis that modern Leftist ideology is, essentially, a fusion of Marxism and Postmodernism. The fact that Peterson has successfully linked these ideologies to genocidal socialist regimes around the world, highlighting their natural endpoint, makes Leftists seethe all the more.
Almost all modern Leftist ideology is rooted in Western Marxism, which was pioneered by:
- Antonio Gramsci, leader of the Italian Communist Party
- Georgy Lukács, Commissar for Culture of the Hungarian Soviet Republic
- The Frankfurt School, a Marxist think tank based in Columbia University and Goethe University, Frankfurt
If you aren’t familiar with the Frankfurt School (also known as The Institute for Social Research), check out their most famous works: The Authoritarian Personality (1950), Eros and Civilization (1966), and Repressive Tolerance (1965). The links to modern Leftist ideology should be pretty obvious.
If you aren’t familiar with Postmodernism (begins 1960s-70s), it can be summarized as follows: “Everything is a social construct, universal truth does not exist, facts are unimportant, ideas are true only if they benefit the oppressed, categorization causes marginalization (and thus oppression).” Many leading Postmodernists (Foucault, Baudrillard, Lyotard, etc.) began their academic careers as Western Marxists, before eventually “rejecting” Western Marxism.
Postmodernist ideas were eventually re-absorbed into Western Marxism, forming the modern Leftist ideology we are familiar with today. This is because Leftist ideology evolves through a process commonly known as “Hegelian Dialectics,” though Hegel himself did not use the term.
Here’s how Karl Marx used this theory:
The central theory of Western Marxism (known colloquially as “Cultural” Marxism) is that the Left cannot achieve victory in the West through violent revolution, because White culture is (or was) too nationalistic and socially conservative. To secure victory, they must first (in the words Lukács) “destroy society” by eroding all existing social values: Family, religion, racialism, nationalism, traditional culture, and so on.
To achieve this, Western Marxists invented a bunch of theories (now called “cultural studies”) that were explicitly designed to disrupt, destabilize, and undermine White society. They weaponized women, minorities, LGBT, etc. against the ever-oppressive “straight White male,” in the same way that Orthodox Marxists attempted to weaponize the working-class against their “bourgeois oppressors.” (Again, the Orthodox Marxist strategy failed because the White working-class were nationalistic conservative bigots).
In 1937, the Frankfurt School invented a methodology known as Critical Theory (theories that are designed to critique and change society), which diverged significantly from “Traditional Theory” (theories that merely explain society).
After the re-infusion of Postmodernism into Western Marxism, their method of societal critique became known as “problematization,” which is basically the process of undermining the social status quo by looking for “problems” within it. By “problems” they mean ways in which it may oppress some “marginalized” group. If they can’t find any “problems,” they invent some. This is why Leftists call everything “problematic.”
These Western Marxist theories gained hegemonic dominance in the West via the infiltration of academia and the indoctrination of each new generation of ruling elites. These elites graduate and take up positions within the upper echelons of society (e.g. within media, corporations, law, etc.), further disseminating these subversive ideas. The chain reaction snowballed, until it became normal for burger stores to tell your son to cut his dick off. This was the Long March Through the Institutions of Power, a strategy originally concocted by Antonio Gramsci in the 1930s.
The ideas central to Western Marxism (anti-family, anti-nationalism, anti-racism, etc., currently labeled “wokeness”) have been present and influential on the Left-Wing since the dawn of Leftism: Charles Fourier, a founder of Socialism, invented the term ‘feminism’; Lenin legalized homosexuality, transgenderism, abortion, divorce, etc.; Weimar Germany, a socialist republic, was a degenerate shit hole; Trotsky invented the term “racism,” pathologizing natural in-group preference; the USSR and PRC commanded, armed, and trained the Communist rebel forces that destroyed South Africa and Rhodesia; Leftists have been at the forefront of every sexual revolution in history; and so on.
However, these ideas were generally not the main focus of the Left. It was not until the failure of the World Revolution (1917-23), which signified the failure of Orthodox Marxism, that Western Leftist shifted their aim to focus exclusively on culture war and cultural revolution. They began their attack on White civilization as soon as the Second World War ended.
I’ve written about all of this in the past, several times. So, sorry if you’re getting déjà vu. My point is that all of this information was once common knowledge on the Right-Wing. This is no longer the case, and for that I blame the Alt-Right.
From 2017 onward, people like…
- Richard Spencer (Holodomor denier, weird links to Russia’s CIA equivalent, GRU)
- Eric Striker (self-identified NazBol, fired from the Dailywire.name for “being a Communist”)
- Keith Woods (self-identified socialist, rose to prominence via Richard Spencer)
- Arktos Media (translated all of GRU spook Aleksandr Dugin’s works for Western consumption)
began promoting the idea that the Left’s total ideological domination of the West was not due to the last 75 years of Leftists infiltrating our institutions (which they have openly admitted to doing), but due to Neo-Liberalism, a set of economic policies that were implemented in the 1980s by people like Thatcher (who was racist and pro-family) and Reagan. Unlike Western Marxism, which consists near-exclusively of theories on how to dismantle the all-oppressing force that is White civilization, Neo-Liberalism contains nothing of the sort.
What Neo-Liberalism was responsible for, is accelerating globalization and enabling corporate monopolization at the hands of international financial elites. These international financial elites have, of course, greatly contributed to the nightmare world that we find ourselves in today. However, they form a specific cabal with specific aims: Rockefeller, Warburg, Rothschild, the Bilderberg Group — you know the gang.
These moneymen openly collaborate with Leftist intellectuals; they provide the cash, Leftists provide the brains, and they both work hand-in-hand towards the same horrendous new world order. For example, Rockefeller financed the Frankfurt School after they were exiled from Europe and harbored in New York in 1934. Students taught by these Leftist intellectuals regularly find their way into elite globalist organizations, like the United Nations or Council on Foreign Relations.
Ascribing the concerted efforts of this criminal cabal to the economic policies of Neo-Liberalism (or worse still, to the mystical abstract force of “Capitalism”) is just as subversive as the Leftists themselves. Yet, that is precisely what the post-2017 Alt-Right did. They simultaneously claimed that Marxism dindu nuffin and attempted to redeem Communism and Socialism, sending huge swathes of the (online) Right-Wing on a ludicrous ideological wild goose chase, culminating in the insanity of 2020, which can be summarized by the following image:
The problem with Liberalism (both the British and French varieties – I’ll write an article on the distinction soon) is that it defangs a country, preventing it from resisting internal political subversion. The same scenario played out during the interwar period with the Left’s attempted World Revolution: The Liberal states were completely inept at dealing with the Leftist onslaught, which caused the rise of nationalist authoritarianism throughout the continent, as the masses looked for someone to take action and fix the problem.
To summarize: Leftism destroys society, Liberalism obstructs resistance to this destruction.
Furthermore, the end-goal of the globalist project is not Liberalism nor “Neo-Liberalism” but the total technocratic enslavement and micromanagement of humanity, which is far closer to Communism — actual Communism, i.e. Communism in practice, not the Communist myth of the stateless utopian paradise — than any other ideological system.
Reminder: Arktos translated all of GRU agent Dugin’s works into English. Fourth Political Theory (4PT) is Dugin’s insane ideology. His book on 4PT contains a chapter explaining why transgenderism is actually “trad.” This article explains more.
Thanks to the lunacy of the Alt-Right and “Third Positionists,” the basic history of Western Marxism (and thus western Leftism as a whole) is all but forgotten. Again, all of the above information was common knowledge on the Right-Wing barely 5 years ago.
The Right is currently so ideologically and intellectually crippled that a race-blind Liberal (James Lindsay) is leading the fight against anti-White hatred in academia and the Leftist long march through the institutions of power.
These days, Right-Wingers seem to be preoccupied with concocting hair-brained LARPs to redeem Socialism and forge unreciprocated “red-brown alliances” with Leftists who openly hate us. Either that, or they’re busy acting as armchair geopolitics generals and attempting to “forge alliances” with “based” brown people and Muslims (who also openly hate us), which culminates in posting “Zionism bad, Islam good, free Palestine” on the internet. Many Right-Wingers even claim that the Right-Wing literally doesn’t exist. Have you ever seen a Leftist call politics a “false dichotomy”? No, you haven’t. The Left may be a degenerate horde of clinically insane freaks, but at least they understand the friend-enemy distinction.
What a fucking mess.
Ah. Maybe man, but I think you’re probably just focusing too much on a small, very loud group of extremely online “influencer” types. If the “right” is intellectually crippled (which it is), I don’t think those guys are responsible for it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The amount of damage done to these circles by Spencer and co. is hard to describe. Turned a bunch of people starting to properly weaponize the net to express a civil pro-white position into edgelord losers simping for Palestine and hellhole dictatorships.
What *wonders* a well-positioned “intel community” operative can do…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pretty good article, coming from a frequent listener/reader of TRS network stuff.
The trends in the grassroots right are indeed becoming too much in favor of socialism. It may be time to push back a bit.
As a pragmatic approach to politics, if winning necessitates going along with certain degrees of ‘redistributionism/socialism’, while pushing our agenda in every single other aspect, then supporting such a “nazi-like” path to victory is rational. Again on pragmatic grounds. In certain countries this seems to be the actual viable path to victory, just as the nazis ‘cucked’ the bolsheviks from their victory by appealing to the “economically leftist” voter base.
An unlikely Palestine victory would be preferable to an Israeli one from a pro-western perspective. Palestines impact on the west was, is and would be nil while Israel was and is a negative effect on the west on many criteria. Just like a ‘brown or red-brown’ alliance, a “hooknose allegiance” is equally delusional as long as they dominate our elite while culturally opposing and often seemingly hating us.
Also on what grounds are we losing the crt debate, or are right wingers without good criticism of it? I wouldn’t know where to look to pulse how the right is doing in this debate.
It is a good observation that we should reclaim the term liberalism and not make it synonymous with corruption, corpocracy or cronyism (like the left dishonestly does, and the nazbol-wignats now constantly do). Otherwise we are indeed complicit and/or victims in the lefts language-defilement strategy.
Also some dumb trends from certain right wing pundits. To name names: Keith Woods’ pushing of ‘philosophical idealism’ (as opposed to materialism) is leftist-tier fart-sniffing, along with Evola, Schopenhauer etc etc.. TRS’ promotion of Modern Monetary Theory (mmt). Most of what Richard Spencer ever said and did..
LikeLiked by 2 people
It also shouldn’t come to the surprise of anyone that Hyperborean and Billy Cornpop who were some of the prime people pulling this bull shit aren’t even white! With the former being an admitted Armenian and the latter later revealing that he was actually a wetback all along!
Don’t even get me started on the “5%” gay op and the lunacy that that spawned.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Cornpop Billy was a nasty, horrid individual. He actually served a valuable purpose in my own evolution. I followed him on Twitter cause at the time I thought that Matt Parrott & co were decent guys. After a week I unfollowed Cornpop cause he went admittedly anti Christian & I began to scratch my head thinking “Why would ppl like Enoch, Parrot, ect associate with & follow freaks like these?” Then I realized… They have the same energy. Many such cases… Once Parrott changed his name to “Masks Work” on Twitter I said, “Okay you’re fuckin libtard who needs to stay far away from nationalists.”
LikeLike
I don’t see the issue with legit Third Positionism (ie. not what is presented by subversive Duginists), “left” and “right” are inflicted by a subverted media and/or government on a nation to cause division of the WHOLE.
Calling them “the left” in the first place implies they have an equal moral or ideological postion to “the right” when you should really just be calling leftists “invaders and brainwashed or bought-off traitors” and dealing with them accordingly, because within that framework there is no argument for anything coming out of their mouths to be credible, much less their continued survival.
Of course, the reason we don’t is because the entirety of “the right” within media reach of the average person ARE the bought-off traitors, thereby proving the false dichotomy from another angle if you didn’t like the first one.
P.S. You are aware Jewden Peterstien is married to a Jewess and has a giant portrait of Lenin in his home that he likes to pose in front of while bragging about deradicalizing white kids and talking about the Jewish think tank he’s involved with, yes?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know what you mean by “Third Positionists”, maybe Duginists/nazbols? Afaik the Third Position is the economic approach of Fascism and National Socialism, which was so effective and succesful that literally caused worldwide jewry to ally from USA to USSR and plunge Europe in WW2 to destroy it and make sure no one ever dares to try it again to escape the eternal debt slavery of the international banking cartel. About left/right dichotomy, it is supposed to be true in a normal environment, but it sure isn’t in current West where the ZOG owns both the sides of the spectrum. And this is exactly why there is no political solution (I know you disagree on this, but I am afraid you’ll find yourself changing your mind sooner or later with how fast our destruction is approaching).
LikeLike
The Right-Wing isn’t even within the Overton window in postwar society, it’s just Marxism and Marxism-infused Liberalism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What do you think about National-socialism et Fascisme? Neither liberal, neither leftist.
Do you identify with the liberal “right-wing”?
LikeLike
Liberals aren’t Right-Wing and no I think they’re completely useless and that they have been infected with Western Marxist values.
LikeLike
Another home run SP. After my evolution from conservatism, I followed & respected many of these ppl. It always hurt a little on the inside to see nazbols (who lead da moobment) shit on our own culture while showing affinity to the third world. Once I saw their subversion for what it was, I knew that my instincts were right.
2020 gave us the perfect opportunity to see them all for what they were (as if Spencer’s 2018 tweet admonishing AOC wasn’t enough).
LikeLike
I’m sometimes surprised that these people still have a following after 2020 shitshow. Unfortunately, a lot of guys just don’t know all that much about politics and these Alt-Right people are their only exposure to the Right-Wing. Mainstream politics is so insane that Alt-Right insanity seems normal in comparison.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember the days on TRS when people used to sneer at Eric Striker for being the resident ‘Soviet apologist’, but for some reason he’s become one of the main fountainheads from which a lot of this ideological poison is flowing from.
He’s been described as a ‘former Maoist’ by some on TRS but that’s absolute bullshit. Striker still parrots the same anti-West, Third Worldism nonsense that every other shitty tankie does, but people think that he’s some kind of based nationalist purely because he talks about the JQ.
TRS started off as ‘we’re the edgy new neo Nazis’ but now you have people in the comments of their podcasts openly claiming to be communists, pro-Islam, Duginist and a whole other host of libshit ists and isms which I think is in no small part due to Strikers influence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pretty amazing how one or two suspicious characters with insane ideas can pollute a whole movement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Plenty of people in non-mainstream right-wing circles are also habitual contrarians and novelty seekers looking for the newest, hottest take they can adopt.
You could see this nearly decade(!) back during the Obama admin when Glenn Beck was talking about George Soros and Cultural Marxism and a bunch of people promptly decided that talking about these things was something for low status Breitbart reading boomercons.
Same people then proceeded to argue that AKSCHUHUALLY Foucault, Marcuse and Adorno were based and thinking these people were bad meant you are a low IQ peasant.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
LikeLiked by 1 person
IMO there’s much more immutable, biological reasons for the dissident-right to be the way they are, and the left-right distinction is better measured by feminine v. masculine mindsets, declared ideologies nonwithstanding. Men can be feminine-minded too, and put on a masculine act. The core functional difference is empathizing v. systemizing, or feels (intuition) v. reals (strict construction).
The feminine can feel better served by any ideology or construciton, it needn’t ‘make sense’, their support can easily be conter-productive and it can be irreciprocated (they get more easily baited and are happier-losers). And cry more for nothing, and etc. You know, just like women. That’s the difference, it’s personal, it’s feelings, free-association and schizoidism, and very confusing to the masculine, autistic, systemizing.
Technology and capital success of the west increased genetic load and variety of expressions possible for people to explore and possibly speciate to, and so they do, and you have a bunch of fringe with retarded ideas. Nominally right or left but mostly feminine-oriented.
Couple designed misinformation and undermining (which you succicntly point out), with emergent of this kind, and yeah you got an interesting playing field here. I do prefer emergence to design always and contrary to what you may say I think it applies well still.
You never needed to tell these people to go off on crazy shit, they want to do it. Not so much stupidity but, feminine bias. P. much.
LikeLike
Perceptive and well said. I was just thinking about how much of this behavior is novelty-seeking, a usually left/feminine trait.
You familiar at all with Doolittle’s work on European Natural Law, etc?
LikeLike
Yes, I’ve learned from him.
LikeLike
I hope you are not going to promise this article against Anglo-saxon liberalism, which is the only final bastion of warfare, and not deliver. Freedom is not a theory, it kept fact modified by Divine law. People kept question
LikeLike
I think Saxon liberalism was just a natural expression of Anglos viking spirit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good stuff overall. I remember years ago, everyone knew this was non sense pushed by communists. That included TRS and Spencer. I noticed ever since Eric Striker came on the seen, he started promoting so called “3rd worldist” causes. I began to call him out on this as did others like Martinez perspective. He never would answer because I said all these countries are hardcore anti white. Iran leader even said they support BLM and antifa over white nationalist.
The other pushing this bullshit was Matt heimbach and TWP. Now Heimbach is a tankie loon. Along with that Gulliermo (billy corn pop) yet another anti white anti Christian type. Keep calling them out!
LikeLike
I think there’s too many people on “the right” that are still buckbroken by Leftist morality and are still stuck in the stage of attacking the Left for being hypocrites, and not for being their enemy. This is exactly what orthodox Marxist types do as well, which is why so many of these “RW” people getting sucked into repeating their talking points.
This also explains why the “allying with brown muslim against evil USA empire” is so common, it’s a the online RW schizo equivalent of the_donald Boomers seeking out their Token brown/gay supporter to prove their beliefs are justified within the liberal moral compass cuckshed.
Oh and the delusional “the West has degenerated and we *deserve* to lose, I can’t wait for China/Russia to kick our ass :)” type-stuff, just deep internalizations of Leftist guilt complex and “USA evil neolib-capitalist bad :(” programming coming to the surface.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think a lot of this bullshit was originally peddled by feds/spooks, but the fact that a lot of the right is still cucked by leftism definitely makes them more receptive to it
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s also a lot pf people on the right or adjacent to it that turn their noses up at anti-authoritarianism/”conspiracy theories” (ie any that distrusts whatever is being pushed by globohomo in the current year).
LikeLike
Thank you for making me more coherent; I love your blog, you should allow for donations, I reccommend monero, its more private
LikeLike
Interesting article. Somehow, I felt you described a part of my internet life, it was so accurate and reminded me of having gone through most of what you mentioned.
I had been feeling something was off with right-wing politics for a while, but I couldn’t tell what it was. And then, I found myself reading this article and connecting a lot of dots, I was so impressed to see things have been this way for almost 5 years, I still feel mindblown!
Regarding the aberration the fourth position (nazbol) is, I agree that that’s one of the main reasons the alt-right became retarded post-2016 –besides the involvement of feds, nazbols really have retarded (and pro marxist) takes and I’m impressed there’s still people that take them seriously despite last year’s mask-off shitshow –it’s beyond my understanding. Got to mention that the fanboys of zionist govts such as Poland or Hungary are no better.
Also, I got to add that here in the third world we’re having our own battle as, in addition to the globalist propaganda that has popped up inorganically in the whole world, we have pretty polarized societies: there’s a half of the population that is as corrupt as/sold to our political class that believe in the globalist bs and push for the legalization of abortion and gay marriage, unironically think the term “whitexican” isn’t a racist slur (a term made a slur (its original meaning was another) by Manuel Ibarra, a resentful obese and brown journalist), among other stuff, and there’s us, the half that really wants to improve our quality of life and our environment, get rid of our politicians and see white genocide as something nefarious and sad for the human biodiversity of the world.
Last, but not least, I genuinely believe that you and your friend Pax (even though I don’t like him as much as I like you) are doing a great job in getting the right back on track.
LikeLike
Was thinking about the CRT fake opposition situation today. 4 main points I can quickly distinguish. First: libs opposing it often use expressions like “transcending things such as race” according to their wayward notion of absolute individual/mental freedom (including to define oneself before reality). So they’re not really advocating from neutrality – they’re raising the pro-miscegenation flag openly. Second: from the social engineering machine’s POV, “absolute freedom” and “no freedom at all” effectively mean the same. If one detaches himself from objective reality due to “absolute freedom of conscience” one is an immediate slave of social engineering (since “man is a social animal” and religion is out of the game to a large extent), not too different from Eastern Bloc ppl during the Cold War. Third: a solid, healthy ethno-racial identity, coupled with other factors, is the best defense against tyrants (who LOVE multi-kulti) and the scientific tyranny alike. Finally, the game here is being played by cynical actors who basically represent the same thing: while the Left dismantles/relativizes everything it doesn’t like (things associated with white/western culture/civilization, masculinity, etc.) it preserves the “reality” (“verisimilarity”, if you will) of things it weaponizes (black suffering at some point in history, plight of lower classes, stigmatization of jews/LGBT/etc. all blown out of proportion according the adopted strategy of the day). This controlled Right on the other hand wants to affirm the “non-reality” of all things, following its economics-centered interpretation of the world (everything is subject to one’s conscience – just don’t complain too much about megacorps or Jews like a dirty nativist okay?).
TL, DR: Solution literally worse than the problem.
LikeLike
Did you read the Frankfurt school
LikeLike
they wrote a lot of stuff, you’re gonna have to be more specific
LikeLiked by 1 person