Professor fired for stating facts
A professor was recently fired for publishing a groundbreaking study proving that IQ is correlated with genetic ancestry: https://www.chronicle.com/article/racial-pseudoscience-on-the-faculty
Higher IQ is correlated with European ancestry in mixed-raced people
Study: In White+Black mixed-race Americans, higher European ancestry correlates with higher IQ. The peer-reviewed study was published in Psych Journal. You can read it here: https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/34/htm
It’s findings were replicated in a study called Genetic Ancestry and General Cognitive Ability in a Sample of American Youths published in Mankind Quarterly:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354766492_Genetic_Ancestry_and_General_Cognitive_Ability_in_a_Sample_of_American_Youths
“Consistent with predictions from the genetic hypothesis, African and Amerindian ancestry were both found to be negatively associated with [IQ / general intelligence]. The association was robust to controls for multiple cultural, socioeconomic, and phenotypic factors.”
Chinese average IQ overestimated due to biased testing
Study: Rural Chinese score 88.95 on the Raven’s non-verbal IQ test, over one standard deviation lower than the commonly cited Chinese IQ of 105. Study also finds that IQ was a better predictor of math achievement than all environmental and demographic variables. So, my theory that Chinese average IQ is overinflated due to biased sampling turned out to be true.
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S10
Ashkenazi average IQ also overestimated
A short video summarizing the theory that Ashkenazi Jewish IQ (often claimed to be as high as 115) is artificially inflated: https://youtu.be/stLCurXu0fc
I’m not familiar with the channel but it seems pretty good. The guy is a very eloquent presenter. I liked his video on subverting language: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twhN4YPBQtM
Figures from aforementioned studies on mixed-race IQ:
Thuletide 
I’m not surprised that Chinese IQ was also inflated, since Ashkenazi elites and their favored goy seem determined to promote China as the model society of the future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Friend of mine made a lazy website a while back with a lot (and I mean a lot) of resources and stuff. IDK I think you may find it interesting: https://rightwingdata.cf/
LikeLike
Yo.,. Can you see my last comment on the last post and tell me what you think. It was about justice and fairness.
LikeLike
“Fairness” is an idea/concept that varies from group to group, ethnicity to ethnicity. It was developed on the basis of how a group can perform and survive best (by facilitating in-group cohesion, or “teamwork”). There will always be some within the group who would slip through the cracks bc they are not as “agreeable” or adaptive accdg. to what the group determines to be the best course for their survival.
But outside the groups, it would sometimes (if not always, depending on whether it is beneficial for all groups), be the “strong” (adaptive) dominating to eat (conquer, take resources from etc.) the “weak” (maladaptive).
When it comes to non-whites (foreigners) in a white (native) country, the “laws”, “customs” and “ideals” of the land (territory of the hosts) do not concern themselves with aliens. But times are quite different today.
LikeLike
Regarding Chinese IQ, I have these sources showing low Chinese IQ, might be useful for you Thule. Agree with Jimmy above, Jews have actively promoted China for decades now, no idea why Xi “Globalism Defender of Davos” Xinping has become some icon of right-wingers online, might as well simp for Zionism like BAP if we really want to become enamoured with hostile non-European groups exploiting us.
https://pastebin.com/P5hEHjgv
LikeLike
How accurate is IQ at determining intelligence? I’m sure it reasonably correlates, but does it really capture the whole picture? The IQ test if I’m not mistaken is where you are asked a bunch of multiple choice questions and you answer them as fast as you can. So therefore wouldn’t results be skewed towards people who have taken a lot multiple choice tests?
Also can IQ capture the “deep thinking” that is most associated with real intelligence. Such as being able to contemplate for hours over complex problems, or creatively paint a work of art?
I’m not attacking the results of the the study, if anything cultural achievements are the best indicator of intelligence in my estimation.
LikeLike
IQ best represents analytical thinking, and it is possible to train yourself to become better at analytical thinking to maximize your IQ potential, but you’re still limited by biology. And you can also practice IQ tests a lot to become good at IQ tests. It’s not a perfect measure but it’s still useful.
LikeLike
You can thank (not me, but Professor Dutton) later. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOqGXhn7YBA
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Calculus of Decay .
LikeLike
What do you about the thesis that East Asians are less creative than European Whites? Do you think there is any genetic basis for it?
LikeLike
It’s true and yes there must be at least some genetic influence because they don’t become more creative when they’re in the West.
LikeLike
I’m late to comment but wanted to ask how then do you explain Jewish over representation in Nobel and Field Medal prizes?
LikeLike
High IQ + high ethnocentrism, the same things that explain their overrepresentation in all other fields.
LikeLike