1984 is often mistakenly believed to be a diatribe against Fascism. It’s a reasonable assumption, since the book was published in 1949, immediately after the conclusive defeat of Fascism during the Second World War. In reality, 1984 was a scathing attack on the arch nemeses of Fascism: The Globalist victors of WW2.
Orwell was by no means sympathetic to Fascism, of course. He was an ardent Democratic Socialist who believed that the Allies (UK, USA, USSR) were led by megalomaniacs, and that their victory would lead to the creation of a totalitarian world government that was Socialist and Democratic in name, but oligarchical and tyrannous in nature. And he was 100% correct: The Allies, who had collectively been known as the ‘United Nations’ since the Arcadia Conference in 1942, formalized their UN alliance as the UN world government in 1945, immediately after the Second World War ended.
However, the conspiracy to establish global governance long predates the Second World War and the United Nations. The same gang of Globalists founded the League of Nations in 1919, as part of the Treaty of Versailles, which was signed immediately after the First World War (what a coincidence).
Their first attempt at world governance was completely ineffectual and disrespected internationally. The League of Nations had no real political nor economic power — a problem that the UN was designed to resolve. The UN’s first political act (outside of warmongering) was to establish a one-world global banking system, which was achieved before the end of the Second World War at the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference. They founded the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), alongside organizations like the GATT (World Trade Organization).
In 1946, all of the League of Nations’ assets, including its major sub-organizations, were transferred directly to the UN. This transition was, essentially, one large rebranding operation. Today, 190 of 195 countries are members of the IMF, and 193 are UN Member States, bound to the United Nations’ laws and regulations.
The setting of 1984 — a world divided between three giant empires competing for world domination — was inspired by the 1943 Tehran Conference, held between the “Big Three” of the United Nations (the UK, USA, and USSR). Orwell describes each empire’s ideology as a form of ‘Oligarchical Collectivism,’ a centralized, collectivist state that explicitly benefits the ruling oligarchy at the expense of the masses. The term was derived from “Bureaucratic Collectivism,” a Trotskyite critique of Stalinist Marxist-Leninism: A form of Communism in which all profit is distributed among The Party’s elite bureaucracy, rather than the proletariat. 1984’s empire of Eurasia practiced ‘Neo-Bolshevism,’ Eastasia ‘Death Worship’ (or ‘Obliteration of Self’), and Oceania ‘INGSOC’ (or ‘English Socialism’).
INGSOC was modeled on the ideals of the British Fabian Society, a gradualist Marxist/Socialist political organization founded in 1884. Orwell’s 1984 describes what he envisioned to be the consequences of a century of Fabian Socialist world domination. He was well acquainted with many leading Fabians, including ‘Brave New World’ author Aldous Huxley, who tutored him at Eton College.
The Fabian Society was founded as the political arm of the Fellowship of the New Life, an occult, socialist think tank founded in 1883. The Fellowship was home to many influential figures, including the UK’s first Labour Party Prime Minister and Karl Marx’s daughter, Eleanor. The Fabian Society has been dominant in both British and global politics for over a century. It founded numerous influential organizations, such as the London School of Economics (1895) and the British Labour Party (1900). Fabians were instrumental in the creation of the United Nations and the entire postwar world order itself. Aldous Huxley’s brother Julian, for example, was the first director of UNESCO. He also coined the term “transhumanism” in his book ‘New Bottles for New Wine’ (1950).
The Fabians’ political aim is — or was, since their objectives have already been achieved to a large degree — the creation of a one-world Socialist government, ruled by a technocratic elite that micromanages every aspect of our lives, including our biology (via transhumanism). However, their ultimate goal is the total alchemical reconfiguration of humanity: They aim to break down the unwashed masses of the world and remold them into an entirely new breed of man — a new species of human, even. Unfortunately, the metaphysical underpinnings of this ideology are beyond the scope of this introductory article.
The fundamental worldview of Fabian Socialists is near-identical to that of Marxist Communists, though their political strategy is radically different. While Marxists generally advocate(d) a violent world revolution, Fabians favor an incredibly gradual, almost undetectable transition towards a totalitarian world-state. Nevertheless, many leading Fabians, such as Sidney and Beatrice Webb, sang high praises of the USSR, even into the Stalinist period, describing it as an ideal vision of the civilizations of the future. The UN’s Julian Huxley called Karl Marx the “the true John the Baptist of Modern Social Science” and referred to the USSR as “a scientific experiment and the only one ever yet carried out in such a field and on such a scale” after visiting it in 1931.
The Fabian Society derives its name from the Roman general Quintus Fabius, known as “the Delayer.” Its logo and emblem are a wolf in sheep’s clothing and a tortoise, and its first pamphlet read: “For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain, and fruitless.” If you think that’s on the nose, flip through some of the “fiction” novels and other literary works published by leading Fabians…
H. G. Well’s ‘A Modern Utopia’ (1905) describes a world ruled by a “World State” (global government) that “owns” the entirety of the planet. An order of “voluntary nobility” known as the Samurai rule the world to resolve the “problem of combining progress with political stability.” Humanity is vegan, all genders are equal, human races are no longer recognized, automation renders physical labor near-obsolete, and currency is based on units of “energy.”
In his work ‘The New World Order’ (1940), Wells puts forward a political framework to guide global leaders towards achieving “world peace.” In brief, it entails the abolition of nation-states and the creation of a centralized, socialist, technocratic, scientifically planned World State. The United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ (1948) was based on the The New World Order.
Well’s ‘The Shape of Things to Come’ (1933) speculates on future events up to the year 2106. He envisions a world left in ruins by a catastrophic global conflict, in which a self-appointed elite takes the reins to rebuild society — and humanity itself — via massive worldwide social engineering. They establish a World State that abolishes all religions, the need for physical labor, and social classes, reducing the entirety of humanity to “middle-class intellectuals.” Eventually, the World State “withers away,” Marxist-style.
Aldous Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’ (1932) describes a World State [noticing any patterns here?] in which citizens are socially, biologically, and environmentally engineered. (Trans-)Humans are produced in artificial wombs on an assembly line and genetically designed to fit into a rigid, intelligence-based caste system. Unlike 1984, which describes an oppressive totalitarian state that restricts all aspects of humanity outside of labor, the masses of Brave New World are oppressed by an overabundance of “luxuries” — consumerism, promiscuity, drugs, and so on — becoming slaves to their own carnal desires. History, religion, and literature are all banned. Brave New World was pitched as a “dystopian fiction” novel, of course, but its “predictions” have been among the most accurate.
Does any of this sound familiar? It should, because it’s exactly what modern Globalists are doing to you at this very moment. This nightmare world didn’t come about by chance, it is a meticulous creation. Since the end of the Second World War, there has been a steady march towards the Fabians’ idealized vision, which appears to be culminating in The Great Reset agenda. This is not to say that all Globalists are literally Fabians, but that the ideas laid out by Fabian Socialists appear to be the most accurate description of where Globalists aim to take their world empire.
An interesting, related fact: Aldous Huxley wrote the foreword for a renowned book published by the United Nations’ “Ashley Montagu” (Israel Ehrenberg), who co-authored UNESCO’s seminal race-denialist document ‘The Race Question’ (1950). Ehrenberg was a student of Franz Boas and studied at Columbia University, which housed the Marxist think tank Institute for Social Research (or ‘Frankfurt School’), after they were expelled from Europe. The Frankfurt School, together with the Rockefeller-funded New School for Social Research, are almost solely responsible for subverting the entirety of the West’s education systems. Their students can be found in all major influential globalist organizations throughout the world.