Karl Marx is arguably the world’s most famous Jew and it would be near-impossible to find somebody who has a more Jewish genealogy than him. So, it’s quite perplexing that he’s continually accused of being an “anti-Semite.” What’s even more perplexing is his reputation as a penniless middle-class rogue who was at war with the “bourgeois” elite of society. We often hear tales of Marx living in squalor, surviving on scraps and handouts from his industrial capitalist friend, Friedrich Engels.
Even the most rudimentary investigation into Marx’s ancestry and personal political connections is enough to refute this flimsy narrative. It may sound unbelievable at first but Karl Marx, the anti-Capitalist hobo, was descended from an elite Jewish lineage and comfortably in bed with both the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy — figuratively and literally.
This article provides a brief rundown of Marx’s genealogy, featuring a few of his most prominent paternal and maternal ancestors. Although an entire book could be dedicated to the subject, the following evidence should be sufficient in demonstrating that Marx was not a scruffy rebel against “the bourgeois system” but fully immersed within it.
The first of Marx’s many suspicious connections is his highly unconventional marriage to Jenny von Westphalen, a member of the Prussian nobility. It was frowned upon for women to marry younger men in 1800s Prussia and almost unheard of for a noblewoman to marry below her social class — let alone for a Prussian noblewoman to marry into a lower-class family of full-blooded Jews via a younger man. At this point in history, Anti-Semitism was extremely widespread, not just in Prussia but throughout the entirety of Europe.
The von Westphalen family was deeply embedded in the international European aristocracy. Jenny’s paternal grandmother was a Scottish noblewoman who descended paternally from King James I of the House of Stuart and maternally from the Dukes of Argyll, who were Scotland’s most powerful family for centuries. Jenny’s father, Ludwig von Westphalen, was the son of the chief of staff of the Prince of Brunswick, a renowned Prussian field marshal and Master Mason who was asked by the British to lead their forces during the American War of Independence.
So, why did Prussian Jenny the aristocrat marry Karl “Penniless Jewish Hobo” Marx? For starters, Marx’s family was by no means impoverished. His father, Hirschel Levi, was a wealthy lawyer who owned numerous Moselle vineyards, while his mother, Henriette Pressburg, was the daughter of a wealthy and influential Jewish merchant family from Holland. They were both descended from long lineages of world-leading rabbis, merchants, and international financiers.
Karl Marx’s maternal grandfather, Isaac Heijmans Pressburg, was a wealthy financier, merchant, and rabbi, whose great-grandfather was the leader of the Jewish community in Hungary. Isaac’s wife, Nanette, came from the wealthy and powerful Barent-Cohen family, many of whom were rabbis, international financiers, and merchants. Her uncle was the influential banker and rabbi, Levy Barent-Cohen, a leading merchant of the City of London. According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, “nearly all the leading Jewish families in England are connected with him [via] distinguished marriages which his children contracted.” This included Karl Marx’s cousin, Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the wealthiest man on earth and richest of the Rothschilds. Nathan’s great-great-grandson, Lionel Rothschild, led the campaign to establish the new state of Israel via the Balfour Declaration.
Marx’s maternal aunt, Sophia, married into the Philips family, who were powerful Jewish industrialists and merchants, renowned today for founding the Philips electronics company. Her husband, Lion, a rich tobacco merchant, financially supported Marx and Jenny throughout their lives. Lion’s merchant banker son, Frederik Philips, also funded Marx via “loans” (handouts), while his daughter, Antoinette, was involved with the Communist First International. Jenny’s brother, Edgar von Westphalen, co-founded Marx’s Communist League.
Marx’s paternal ancestry consists of an unbroken chain of leading rabbis, dating back at least eight centuries. His paternal great-great-grandfather, rabbi Joshue Heschel Lwow, was so influential that “no important decision was taken in the Jewish world without his having first been consulted” [See: Karl Marx: His Life and Thought by David McLellan]. Marx’s great-(x9)-grandfather, Judah ben Eliezer ha-Levi Minz, was the leading rabbi of Italy and the author of multiple ‘takanot’ (major modifications to Jewish religious laws). Most importantly, Marx’s paternal great-(x8)-grandfather, rabbi Meir ben Isaac Katzenellenbogen, was the direct ancestor of Europe’s leading rabbis, Talmudists, and heads of rabbinic courts, and a direct descendant of the House of David [See: The Unbroken Chain by Neil Rosenstein and this article]. Thus, Marx himself was paternally descended from the House of David, which is very significant in Jewish culture, as they believe that their messiah will be a direct patrilineal descendant of the Davidic line.
So, in brief: Marx married into well-connected Prussian aristocracy that was descended from European kings, he was personally descended from a huge lineage of incredibly influential bankers and rabbis, was a cousin of the Rothschilds, and a descendant of the House of David. There was no hyperbole in this article’s opening claim that it would be near-impossible to find somebody who has a more Jewish genealogy than Marx.
Unfortunately, this genealogical investigation leaves us with more questions than answers: Why was Marx, the “arch-nemesis of capitalism,” bankrolled by leading industrialists and big capitalists, and why did they allow their children to join Marx’s Communist organizations? Moreover, all of this information is out in the open and relatively easy to find. So, why does the mainstream media, academics, historians, etc., always paint Marx out to be a starving plebian hobo who was “rebelling against the bourgeois system,” when he was a direct product of said system and entirely dependent upon it?
Was Communism a scam from the start? After all, “Real Communism” (the stateless society) is an unimplementable utopian fantasy. Every “Communist” society in human history has devolved into a soulless, totalitarian, and genocidal oligarchy.
” So, why does the mainstream media, academics, historians, etc., always paint Marx out to be a starving hobo who was “rebelling against the bourgeois system,” when he was completely intertwined with it and his entire life depended upon it?”
Nobody paints Marx as a “starving hobo.” This is a figment of your imagination, or perhaps Miles Mathis, from whom you plagiarized the information in this article from. As for Marx being “intertwined” with the bourgeoisie, again, this is common knowledge: just because one belongs to or descends from a certain social class, it doesn’t follow that one must be loyal to that class.
lol whatever libtard
and I plagiarized it from my buddy Apollonian Germ and the book sources listed in the article
Miles Mathis has cultivated his ego to such a degree he can no-longer see the forest for the trees. He has been dead wrong numerous times, yet lacks the integrity to admit it.
///Why was Marx, the “arch-nemesis of capitalism,” bankrolled by leading industrialists and big capitalists, and why did they allow their children to join Marx’s Communist organizations?///
Let my try to answer this question.
This answer is based on explanations of iconic Russian general Konstantin Pavlovich Petrov. Here some vids: https://www.youtube.com/user/mertvayavoda/featured
I know some fragments were translated into English.
Karl Marx was a Kabbalist practitioner.
Marxism is an ugly Jewish materialism. Marx diagnosis: in capitalism power belongs to groups that control the means of production – is obviously false. Apollonian Germ once recalled an interesting article dealing with the realities of capitalism in the 19th century: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xna6atmkV0
I did read letters between the young Marx and Engels (mid 19th century) where Marx was lying about the obvious truth that under capitalism the supreme power was held by the groups controlling the money creation and the exchange of money. Marx knew his explanation was false and was criticized for it from the beginning.
Marx was a Kabbalist. His goal was to cause and justify a world war-revolution in which Jewish revolutionists would stand up for the rights of over-exploited proletariat. But the goal was a war-revolution. That was a Messianic agenda, tikkun-olam.
Exodus 15:3 The LORD is a man of war: the LORD is his name.
Marx wanted to use the exploited proletariat to cause a world revolution, then cultural Marxists used feminists, various LGBT fricks, Blacks, etc. They wanted another cause for the same war.
Lenin understood the idea of Marx and continued it. Lenin died and Trotsky was to take over power after him. Trotsky, however, fell ill and Joseph Stalin took advantage of it. Stalin was not a Marxist. As early as 1924, he proposed that instead of a world revolution, one should focus on building socialism in one country (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_one_country). In 1927 there was a failed Trotskyist coup d’état, Trotsky was expelled from the USSR, and in 1929 great industrialization began, a Soviet economic miracle.
Stalin was not a Marxist, he betrayed the cause of the world revolution and therefore the Jews hate him ardently. He was successfully murdered in 1953. Stalin built a world power with the help of the Jews on the ruins of Marxism.
Today, the followers of Marx’s ideas are eg. Neoconservatives who proclaim world war-revolution.
Exodus 15:3 The LORD is a man of war: the LORD is his name.
LikeLiked by 1 person
stalin support the world revolution
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Why was Marx, the ‘arch-nemesis of capitalism,’ bankrolled by leading industrialists and big capitalists, and why did they allow their children to join Marx’s Communist organizations?”
Because — from the very beginning — Marxism has been a tool of the international corporate elite, created and controlled by the corporate elite to increase its power and wealth.
No one at the top believes the slogans, only the dopes at the bottom — the college students and other useful idiots desperate to feel part of something bigger than themselves and look “cool” and “progressive” to their useful idiot friends.
The “Marxist Theorists”, “leftist” politicians, and “progressive” academics and news celebrities are non-ideological servants of the international corporate elite, just doing what they are paid to do — they are the willing servants of the very persons they pretend to oppose.
When a useful idiot says, “I am a Marxist!” he is really saying, “I have no confidence in myself, no grounding in family or religion, and am desperate to belong to something that will give me a sense of purpose and make me look sophisticated and cutting-edge” or — perhaps more sadly — “I am a moron and really believe this stuff.”
When a “Marxist Theorist”, “leftist” politician, etc., says, “I am a Marxist!” he is really saying, “I am working to enrich the international corporate elite at your expense; I am well-paid for my work; and if the lock-down tyranny I am working to create comes into being during my lifetime, I expect to be one of the upper-echelon leaders telling the rest of you what to do.”
Not really “corporate elite”, really, just Jews. Obviously not all Jews, but a lot of the politically-engaged Jews.
marx him self was a anti-semite, he has 2 books named on the jewish question and world with out jews.
actually he was the based red-pilled guy you makes reject modernity edit who has a lot of children, sayed the n word
and that most of non-whites are not capable of revolution.
he wasn’t an anti-semite or based he was a degenerate libtard
Reblogged this on Calculus of Decay .